Distillation

["97692af3a9ed7ba9725c63f42ab5134b","f84ac0cd2445e99f7d334e1a959e8a2e"]

<observations> Date: Jul 5, 2026 * 🟡 (12:14) [tool:result] GitHub page loaded for kunchenguid/no-mistakes repo: "git push no-mistakes" — a local git proxy tool, 5.3k stars, 312 forks, 10 watchers, MIT license, latest release v1.31.2 (Jun 27, 2026), 78 total releases, written in Go (99.8%) * 🟡 (12:14) Tool description: acts as local git proxy in front of real remote; pushing to "no-mistakes" remote spins up disposable worktree, runs AI validation pipeline (review → test → docs → lint → push → PR → CI), auto-applies "safe" fixes, escalates "ask-user" findings, forwards branch to configured push target and opens PR only when all checks pass * 🟡 (12:14) Tool is agent-agnostic, supports claude, codex, rovodev, opencode, pi, copilot, or acp:<target> via acpx with ordered fallbacks * 🟡 (12:14) Three trigger methods: `git push no-mistakes` (explicit git path), `no-mistakes` TUI (wizard for branch/commit/push), `/no-mistakes` (agent skill command) * 🔴 (12:14) User referred to as "BYK" works at Sentry * 🔴 (12:14) User uses opencode as coding agent * 🔴 (12:14) User enforces rigorous multi-pass code reviews using Biome for linting (not ESLint) * 🔴 (12:14) User runs full typechecks and vitest before any commits * 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (12:14) User follows disciplined PR workflow: push branches, create PRs, monitor CI results * 🔴 (12:14) User has strict rule: `.lore.md` must always be committed, is updated by a background process, but must be excluded from PR commits * 🔴 (12:14) User has standing directive: never trust a fix without seeing the test fail first (red-green/TDD discipline) * 🔴 (12:14) User has standing directive: always assert root cause before applying a fix * 🔴 (12:14) User has standing directive: always ask why a bug wasn't caught by tests * 🔴 (12:14) User runs adversarial subagent code review with severity categorization as part of workflow * 🔴 (12:14) Some of user's repos use jj (Jujutsu) instead of git as version control * 🟡 (12:14) Assistant referenced a project named "loreai" as one of user's repos (lore-managed repo) * 🟡 (12:14) Assistant's verdict: not a clear adopt for user's workflow — overlaps with discipline already enforced manually, and "AI auto-fixes safe things" premise conflicts with user's red-green/root-cause-first rules * 🟡 (12:14) Assistant identified 5 risk points: (1) philosophical conflict with test discipline, (2