Distillation

🔴 [completed-task] (20:42) User-provided workflow status marked “Read protocol and coding schema and identify all decision/evidence requirements” as completed with high priority.
🔴 [completed-task] (20:42) User-provided workflow status marked “Inspect complete frozen source body, metadata, and patch for all 10 records without model summaries” as completed with high priority.
🔴 [completed-task] (20:42) User-provided workflow status marked “Inspect and validate frozen model codings against source and schema” as completed with high priority.
🔴 [task-in-progress] (20:42) User-provided workflow status marked “Produce complete final codings, rationales, and graph-edge revisions” as in progress with high priority.
🔴 [pending-task] (20:42) User-provided workflow status marked “Validate output completeness, exact quotes, source IDs, and protocol compliance” as pending with high priority.
🟡 (20:42) Assistant stated the source and model review was complete and that it was resolving disputed classifications and validating every final edge against exact frozen quotes before returning the complete 10-record array.
🔴 (20:42) User supplied /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md, titled Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2, frozen 2026-08-27, with status pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol. (meaning August 27, 2026)
🔴 (20:42) User supplied the V1.2 protocol correction: V1.1 used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders, but its evaluator field named “strict edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status while omitting edge scope and evidence references; it also failed to route separately coded body/patch-relationship disagreements, causing 6 records with material differences to be labeled provisional_exact_agreement.
🔴 (20:42) User supplied the corrected evaluator requirements: strict edge signatures include scope and complete grounded evidence references; body/patch-relationship disagreement is an explicit route reason; the remaining non-routed state is named provisional_core_agreement; and full-response agreement is reported separately but is not required because titles and numeric confidence are not canonical research fields.
🔴 (20:42) User supplied that V1.2 routes 35 records rather than 29, reuses the byte-identical V1.1 coding bundle and both Luna response files from workflow run 33060493337, and repeats only the Terra advisory pass over the corrected route to isolate evaluator changes from model sampling variance.
🔴 (20:42) User supplied that no model response, performance observation, transition date, or desired result influenced the V1.2 correction; Terra remains advisory, all records remain ineligible for the canonical ledger, and the response schema and frozen envelope are unchanged.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json, a JSON Schema Draft 2020-12 object with $id=https://github.com/BYK/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json, title Performance-blinded governance coding v1, and additionalProperties=false.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied the governance-coding schema’s required top-level fields in exact order: record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, ambiguity.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied record_class enum values: effective_institutional_change, announced_institutional_change, proposal_only, control_event, no_event, abstain.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied nullable event_kind values: leadership, board_or_steering, control_rights, reorganization, foundation_transfer, license, fork, reunification, strategy, product, external, or null.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied body_patch_relation enum values: consistent, patch_supersedes_body, body_only, patch_only, conflict, not_applicable, unclear.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied that each power_changes item disallows additional properties and requires actor, right_kind, target, direction, change_status, scope, and evidence_refs.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied right_kind enum values: appoint, remove, elect, vote, delegate, override, approve, merge, write, release, veto, own, license, steward, fund, set_budget, set_strategy, set_policy, set_membership, set_terms, inform.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied edge enum constraints: direction is added, removed, or modified; change_status is effective, announced, proposed, rejected, or unclear.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied that evidence_refs must contain at least 1 object requiring non-empty source_id and quote; confidence must be a number from 0 through 1.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied a tool result stating “No files found”; the displayed result did not identify the search path or pattern.
🔴 (20:43) User supplied a readable /tmp/opencode/institutional-transition-adjudication-9642983578/v1.2-adjudication-package.json; the tool reported 4,085 lines and displayed lines 1–20.
🔴 (20:44) User supplied competing codings for opentofu-github-issue-1353: Luna A classified it proposal_only/control_rights, with a proposed set_policy edge by OpenTofu targeting technical documentation and UI writing, citing “I'm proposing a framework for technical documentation and user interface writing.” and “getting all authors to set aside their pet styles and use the standard style for OpenTofu.”; Luna B and Terra advisory classified it no_event with no edges. Luna A used body_only, Luna B not_applicable, and Terra body_only.
🔴 (20:44) User supplied competing codings for opentofu-github-issue-2109: Luna A and Luna B classified it proposal_only/control_rights, citing “This would enable users to specify a GitHub repository as a provider source, allowing for more flexible and decentralized provider management.” Luna A coded users gaining proposed override of the centralized registry; Luna B coded users gaining proposed steward rights over provider management; Terra advisory classified it no_event with no edges.
🔴 (20:44) User supplied codings for opentofu-github-issue-2573: Luna A and Luna B both classified it no_event with no event kind, dates, scope, or power changes; their titles were respectively Correct year in TSC summaries and Use correct year in Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary; Terra advisory was null.
🔴 (20:44) User supplied codings for opentofu-github-issue-258: Luna A, Luna B, and Terra advisory all classified the Homebrew-like registry-design choice as control_event/product, with announced_on=2023-11-03, no effective date, and no power changes. Luna A and Terra used body_only; Luna B used not_applicable. (meaning November 3, 2023)
🔴 (20:44) User supplied competing codings for opentofu-github-issue-340: Luna A classified the proposal to enable GitHub Discussions as control_event/product, announced_on=2023-09-07, body_patch_relation=not_applicable, and no power changes; Luna B and Terra advisory classified it no_event with no power changes and body_patch_relation=body_only. Terra’s ambiguity stated that the issue proposes enabling GitHub Discussions and offers moderation but does not evidence an implemented organizational-rights change. (meaning September 7, 2023)
🔴 (20:45) User supplied a truncated tool result whose complete output was saved at /home/byk/.local/share/opencode/tool-output/tool_082c4317c001zJ22xj3BqiftCN.
🔴 (20:45) User supplied evidence stating: “Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept [Chef EULA]”.
🔴 (20:45) User supplied the linked form of the evidence: “Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept Chef EULA.”
🔴 (20:45) User supplied the plain-text form of the evidence: “Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept Chef EULA.”
🔴 (20:45) User supplied a model ambiguity stating that an unmerged, closed PR proposed AI-agent commit autonomy but did not establish implementation or actual adoption.
🔴 (20:45) User supplied a governance voting-rule quote: “| 2/3 Majority | At least 2/3 of binding vote holders (active committers or TSC members) must vote +1. Reserved for foundational changes to the project. |”

Distillation

Observations