Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Distillation
139f8f54-4639-4e87-ac78-65926814e81b["lore_tm_v1_xOdihHicuprDYrAmwfKmpHcBtBaJrv_3C8BEKqAIfDs","lore_tm_v1_-65PPBwehkg-tth4dkq7iUq56af8A1_GAztprhdAlNA","lore_tm_v1_2RU9hHN-Qgqn2MV2ZGttglY4C3a6OerUFdx4UTmJpEs","lore_tm_v1_sa3aoH0OK2bhvLWePVmD202cmX6dsHZSSPi7fIwKIkA","lore_tm_v1_TIbpqIyz6KPbK6DZoSdc6Ti2sqyrLcq_LfNu0CXVYZA"]
/usr/bin/bash: line 1: python: command not found.ok.[].schema_version: 1, design_status: "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication", and one reviewer: reviewer_id: "opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b", reviewer_type: "llm", model: "openai/gpt-5.6-sol", role: "source_adjudicator", assistance "Independent source-first adjudication of OpenTofu records 10-18".opentofu-github-pr-2830 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/2830): decision abstain, accepted_from: null, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited sources before codings: body, pr_metadata, patch:0, patch:1, patch:2; bounds: files listing complete, patch selection truncated, unavailable patches 0, source text not truncated. Rationale: visible merged Charter/Governance patches describe TSC authority, but Charter shows initial adoption September 15, 2023 and amendment May 20, 2025 while body says initial TSC members served before the current charter; truncated 43-file patch selection cannot show which powers were added, modified, or restated or a complete edge set, so none of three frozen responses was defensible. Limitation: prior charter baseline and remaining patches omitted; no later/reconstructed diff used. Unresolved: no complete before/after institutional-rights delta or defensible edge direction. Evidence refs: record_class/body—“We have iterated back and forth to define a governance structure that suits the OpenTofu project and best enables and protects the project.”; record_class/patch:0—“| Initial Adoption | September 15, 2023 |”; record_class/patch:0—“| Amendment | May 20, 2025 |”; event_kind/patch:0—“The Technical Steering Committee (the “TSC”) will be responsible for all technical oversight of the open source Project.”; title/body—“OpenTofu Charter and Governance”; affected_scope/patch:1—“The TSC has ultimate authority over all projects in the OpenTofu organization.”; body_patch_relation/body—“The initial TSC Members are those who have been serving the role prior to the current charter”. final_coding: null; graph_edge_revision: null.opentofu-github-pr-2953 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/2953): decision abstain, accepted_from: null, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited sources: body, pr_metadata, and patch:0 through patch:12; bounds: files listing complete, patch selection truncated, unavailable patches 0, source text not truncated. Rationale: body/patches show governance references and TSC notes moving from opentofu/opentofu to opentofu/org, but not an organizational-rights change; only part of a 43-file PR is visible and destination repository contents are absent, preventing complete coding or exclusion of omitted material changes. Limitation: remaining patches and opentofu/org destination absent; no later/reconstructed diff used. Unresolved: cannot determine whether this was merely document relocation or also changed institutional rights. Evidence refs: record_class/body—“Updated references and moved governance stuff to a new repo opentofu/org”; record_class/pr_metadata—"changed_files": 43; title/body—same relocation quote; affected_scope/patch:0—[opentofu/org/CHARTER.md](https://github.com/opentofu/org/blob/main/CHARTER.md); affected_scope/patch:2—“Agendas and meeting notes can be found in the opentofu/org/TSC folder.”; body_patch_relation/patch:1—[opentofu/org/GOVERNANCE.md](https://github.com/opentofu/org/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md). final_coding: null; graph_edge_revision: null.opentofu-github-pr-2959 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/2959): decision abstain, accepted_from: null, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body and pr_metadata; bounds: files listing complete, patch selection not truncated, unavailable patches 0, source text not truncated. Rationale: body requests a CODEOWNERS update for newly named opentofu-maintainers, and metadata says the one-file PR merged, but no patch reveals owner pattern, displaced team, paths, or whether only review requests rather than merge/write authority changed; implementation responsibility alone does not support a power edge. Limitation: metadata reports one changed file but no github_pr_patch component exists. Unresolved: actual control configuration, actor, target, direction, and scope cannot be verified. Evidence refs: record_class/body—“CODEOWNERS is not working at the moment since we have a new governance chart and the new team is named opentofu-maintainers”; event_kind and title/body—“update CODEOWNERS to match the new governance chart”; affected_scope/body—“the new team is named opentofu-maintainers”; body_patch_relation/pr_metadata—"changed_files": 1. final_coding: null; graph_edge_revision: null.opentofu-github-pr-3473 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/3473): decision reject, accepted_from: null, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body, pr_metadata, patch:0; all evidence bounds complete/untruncated with unavailable patches 0. Rationale: open, unmerged RFC for a Databricks state backend; “governance” refers to Unity Catalog access control/auditing, not OpenTofu organizational authority; an unimplemented product proposal is not an institutional/control event, so both Luna control-event codings were rejected. No evidence limitations or unresolved reason. Evidence refs: record_class/body—“This submits a RFC for adding the Databricks backend with locking to OpenTofu.”; record_class/pr_metadata—"merged": false, "merged_at": null, "state": "open"; title/body—“RFC: databricks backend”; affected_scope/patch:0—“This RFC proposes adding Databricks as a new state backend for OpenTofu”; body_patch_relation/body—submission quote; body_patch_relation/patch:0—“# Databricks Backend with Locking for OpenTofu”. Final coding: record_class: "no_event", event_kind: null, title "Databricks backend RFC", announced_on: null, effective_on: null, affected scope "proposed OpenTofu Databricks state backend", body_patch_relation: "consistent", power_changes: [], confidence 0.99, ambiguity "The pull request is open and unmerged; its governance language concerns Unity Catalog data controls, not OpenTofu institutional authority." Graph revision basis luna_b, with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-3559 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/3559): decision accept, accepted from terra_advisory, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body, pr_metadata; bounds complete/untruncated, unavailable patches 0. Rationale: body records a TSC-linked support-policy product control event; absent patch/policy terms prevent an effective date or organizational-rights edge, matching Terra’s limits. Limitation: metadata reports one changed file but no patch, so policy terms and implementation cannot be inspected. Evidence refs: record_class/body—“Update support policy in RELEASE.md per TSC-09-12-25”; event_kind/body—“support policy in RELEASE.md”; title/body—“Update support policy in RELEASE.md”; announced_on/record_metadata—"published_on":"2025-12-09"; affected_scope/body—“support policy in RELEASE.md”; body_patch_relation/body—“As discussed in the @opentofu/technical-steering-committee meeting on 09-12-25”. Final coding: affected scope "support policy in RELEASE.md", ambiguity "No implementing patch or policy terms are supplied, so no organizational rights change or effective policy revision can be established.", announced 2025-12-09, relation body_only, confidence 0.68, effective date null, event kind product, no power changes, class control_event, title "Update support policy in RELEASE.md". Graph revision basis terra_advisory, no added/removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-4018 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/4018): decision accept, accepted from luna_b, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body, pr_metadata, patch:0, patch:1; bounds complete/untruncated, unavailable patches 0. Rationale: merged visible patches implement an official-build marker/detector, a product control event; they do not establish the proposed end of 32-bit support or an organizational release-right change, so Luna B correctly adds no edge. Limitation: metadata reports seven changed files but frozen sources only include release-workflow and official-build detector patches; no 32-bit warning implementation is shown. Evidence refs: record_class/body—“This PR therefore implements a compromise:”; record_class/pr_metadata—"merged": true, "merged_at": "2026-08-11T20:53:09Z"; event_kind/body—Introduces a new concept of "official builds"; title/patch:1—“IsOfficialBuild returns true if the current executable was built with”; announced_on/record_metadata—"published_on":"2026-04-09"; effective_on/pr_metadata—"merged_at": "2026-08-11T20:53:09Z"; affected_scope/patch:0—“running one of our official release builds.”; affected_scope/body—“third-parties like Linux distribution maintainers produce their own builds for these CPU architectures”; body_patch_relation/body—official-build concept quote; body_patch_relation/patch:0—BUILD_OPENTOFU_OFFICIAL: '1'. Final coding: affected scope "OpenTofu official release builds and third-party builds", ambiguity "The supplied patch shows official-build detection but not the described 32-bit warning implementation.", announced 2026-04-09, relation consistent, confidence 0.84, effective 2026-08-11, kind product, no power changes, class control_event, title "Add official-build detection for release builds". Graph basis luna_b, no added/removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-727 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/727): decision accept, accepted from terra_advisory, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body, pr_metadata, patch:0; complete/untruncated bounds, unavailable patches 0. Rationale: sole patch adds an SPDX identifier to one script; licensing metadata does not prove a new license grant, copyright transfer, or organizational licensing-power change, so Terra’s no-event coding is correct. No evidence limitations or unresolved reason. Evidence refs: record_class/patch:0—# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0; title/body—“Add the license to compare-release-versions.sh”; affected_scope/body—“compare-release-versions.sh”; body_patch_relation/body—“This change adds a license I missed when writing the compare-release-versions script for the release workflow version comparison.”; body_patch_relation/patch:0—SPDX line. Final coding: affected scope ".github/scripts/compare-release-versions.sh", ambiguity null, announced null, relation consistent, confidence 0.99, effective null, event kind null, no power changes, class no_event, title "Add MPL-2.0 license identifier to compare-release-versions script". Graph basis terra_advisory, no added/removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-823 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/823): decision accept, accepted from luna_a, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body, pr_metadata, patch:0; complete/untruncated bounds, unavailable patches 0. Rationale: merged TSC summary records unanimous registry-RFC selection, decision not to pursue a user-facing registry design yet, and founders’ staffing arrangement; these are strategy control events, not redistributed organizational rights, and Luna A adds no edge. Limitation: sole-file patch has decisions/next steps but no downstream registry implementation and reports staffing without defining funding/appointment rights. Evidence refs: record_class/patch:0—“There was a unanimous consensus the RFC for Homebrew-like artifact resolution registry component should be picked.”; event_kind and title/patch:0—“Selecting an RFC for a registry solution for resolving providers/modules”; announced_on/record_metadata—"published_on":"2023-11-05"; affected_scope/patch:0—“It was decided to not have the core team pursue a user facing registry design (i.e documentation part) just yet”; affected_scope/patch:0—“Following a founders meeting decision to hire core team members under various pledging companies their payroll and donate time, rather than under direct foundation payroll -”; body_patch_relation/body—“Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-11-02”; body_patch_relation/patch:0—“## 2023-11-02”. Final coding: affected scope "OpenTofu registry solution and core team staffing", ambiguity null, announced 2023-11-05, relation patch_only, confidence 0.94, effective null, kind strategy, no power changes, class control_event, title "TSC selects RFC for a registry solution". Graph basis luna_a, no added/removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-990 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/990): decision accept, accepted from terra_advisory, reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-b; audited body, pr_metadata, patch:0; complete/untruncated bounds, unavailable patches 0. Rationale: merged patch records a unanimous TSC product decision to change the default registry namespace, but does not implement it or alter TSC authority; Terra correctly uses a product control event with no effective date or power edge. Limitation: complete sole-file patch is only a TSC summary and contains no implementation/effectiveness evidence. Evidence refs: record_class/patch:0—“Decision: Quick unanimous yes”; event_kind and title/patch:0—“Decide if we are changing the default registry namespace to opentofu”; announced_on/record_metadata—"published_on":"2023-12-10"; affected_scope/patch:0—“default registry namespace to opentofu”; body_patch_relation/body—“Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-05”; body_patch_relation/patch:0—“## 2023-12-05”. Final coding: affected scope "OpenTofu default registry namespace", ambiguity "The merged patch records a TSC decision, but does not implement or otherwise show the registry namespace change taking effect.", announced 2023-12-10, relation consistent, confidence 0.91, effective null, kind product, no power changes, class control_event, title "TSC decision to change the default registry namespace to opentofu". Graph basis terra_advisory, no added/removed edges.2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json; 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769 cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json; 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md; bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json; 6181f5cb60a0462f83be00be301763daa89f11581e68ee1c46a84e8bf4e5be31 schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json.validate_adjudication_fragment: [] and marked the result EVIDENCE-COMPLETE.