Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Distillation
Distillation
ID: 2047c41c-0459-4443-a2a6-1ee2de86aaf5
Generation: 0
Tokens: 281
R_compression: 16.616
C_norm: 0.000
Archived: No
Created: 2026-09-09 13:13:05
Source IDs:
["lore_tm_v1_MdCnreXMqcs46x_2hFteMgTTML9RGFrYxaDDKB50pqA","lore_tm_v1_x2wFpAu_X1HJpgHl0UeQ90m94kNziOsKK2sr6l264HE","lore_tm_v1_1qP37xt0AlKMpivxu7DuCGsyH0r-EGnUbUL6yUY9HJY","lore_tm_v1_H7mU3G6LkD-Zzn4qaibGDivCs6HoxqlQyCt0f524zdA"]
Observations
Date: Sep 9, 2026
- 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (13:11) User directed work to continue on issue #4 only from completed notifications: use a substantive ZIP-hardening retry result, but if it returned empty twice, “replace only that reviewer with smaller disjoint design scopes.”
- 🔴 [requested-tests] (13:11) User required deterministic fail-first regressions for all completed JSON/pin, descriptor, ZIP, and CLI-publication findings before applying production fixes.
- 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (13:11) User required no polling, duplication, or overlap of active work; after fixes, run targeted and full verification plus fresh independent correctness and security reviews against the exact final tree; retain exactly one follow-up while relevant work remains active.
- 🟡 (13:11) Assistant reported that neither disjoint replacement ZIP review had completed, preserved both review boundaries without polling, and did not begin overlapping work.
- 🟡 (13:11) Follow-up
ukvy8ld7 was scheduled for 15 minutes as the single pending continuation. Its continuation instructions were to consume substantive results from both disjoint replacement ZIP reviews, retry each reviewer once if its first result is empty, replace only a twice-empty reviewer, then perform the required regressions, fixes, verification, and independent final-tree reviews.