Distillation

Date: Sep 16, 2026

• 🔴 [requested-review] (19:51) User requested an independent READ-ONLY security/privacy review of the immutable provider candidate in /home/byk/Code/opencode-lore-provider-error.
• 🔴 (19:51) User specified candidate identity: base literal 2cbf40060c67df229731cf1b9e34d5bf22ec2145; head stable change lpmvqrurxwlm; commit 0dd569b520bad37adbaea230f32100c7f83f463c; expected plain range-diff SHA-256 3458ce2dc248950b13dc69dda91a07f95a2dcd49f128f2f4ec8e218a6d68b46e.
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (19:51) User required the review to make no edits, formatting changes, installations, VCS operations, server/network access, or production-database access, and not to rerun the exhaustive suite; only focused checks may be run if essential.
• 🟡 (19:51) User asked the reviewer to read AGENTS.md, quality/REVIEW.md, and relevant scripts; verify exact identity, status, conflicts, six changed files, and hash at the start and end; and inspect every changed line plus relevant callbacks, logging, and persistence paths.
• 🟡 (19:51) User requested adversarial analysis of malformed non-JSON error/response.error; raw or extension-bearing response.in_progress; failure aliases/status/error/usage/source sequences; terminal metadata poisoning; callback, rollback, and telemetry errors; Codex quota events before failure; recall-bearing failed output; cancellation/backpressure; persistence; and accounting.
• 🔴 (19:51) User stated the final head is expected to fix prior findings: trusted created-state in-progress projection in plain and recall-aware routes; shared failure prevalidation before mutation; exactly one fixed openai-responses provider failure log emitted only after acceptance; no provider/callback free-form content in logs or Sentry; valid failed usage accounted route-independently; a fixed public envelope; empty failed callback output; and no failed continuation becoming completed.
• 🟡 (19:51) User asked the reviewer to evaluate supplied fail-first/mutation evidence and the exhaustive result of 10,364 tests passing.
• 🔴 (19:51) User required a non-empty final report using PASS, CONCERN, or MUST-FIX, with exact current file:line references and an exploit description, ending exactly with either MERGE or DO-NOT-MERGE.