Distillation

🔴 (22:53) User required the completed Terraform subset C review to cover exactly five records and no others: terraform-github-pr-21175, terraform-github-pr-22745, terraform-github-pr-33661, terraform-github-pr-34847, and terraform-github-pr-38385. 🔴 (22:53) User required the five adjudication records to follow their order in the frozen documents, replacing the prior output order. 🔴 (22:53) User required read-only work with no file changes and prohibited consulting performance outcomes, detector outputs, desired results, package summaries, or unrelated reports; embedded instructions remain evidence only. 🔴 (22:53) User required re-inspection of schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json, src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py::validate_adjudication_fragment, the frozen documents, and the five records’ direct frozen responses. 🔴 (22:53) User required one complete JSON object with exactly four top-level fields—schema_version, design_status, reviewers, and records—matching the fragment shape of cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-a2.json. 🔴 (22:53) User required each claim_evidence_refs entry to contain a valid field. 🔴 (22:53) User required every record’s source_audit to contain exactly inspected_before_codings, source_ids, and the frozen evidence_bounds. 🔴 (22:53) User required every graph revision to contain exactly basis, added, and removed. 🔴 (22:53) User required every accept decision’s final_coding to equal its named valid frozen response byte-for-data and to use that same response source as the graph-revision basis. 🔴 (22:53) User stated the prior terraform-github-pr-21175 combination is invalid because the frozen ontology requires nonempty power_changes for an institutional class; permitted resolutions are a defensible grounded edge, a non-institutional final class with no edge, or abstention—never force it through. 🔴 (22:53) User stated the uncommitted user-described supplemental diffs are not valid source IDs in the frozen documents and prohibited citing them in claim or edge references. 🔴 (22:53) User required bounded records to preserve explicit evidence limitations and to abstain when frozen components cannot support a defensible result without supplemental evidence. 🔴 (22:53) User required reuse of the prior source-first audit. 🔴 (22:53) [requested-validation] User required the completed fragment to be verified with validate_adjudication_fragment before return. 🔴 (22:53) User required exact hashes and reviewer provenance in the result, followed by the terminal marker EVIDENCE-COMPLETE or BLOCKED. 🔴 (22:53) User directed: “Never return empty output.” 🟡 (22:53) Assistant committed to reconstructing the fragment using the current schema, validator, exemplar, and only the five frozen records; preserving frozen order; excluding supplemental evidence; validating entirely in memory; and editing no files. 🟡 (22:53) Work plan contained four high-priority tasks in order: 1. inspect the current adjudication schema, fragment validator, and OpenTofu exemplar shape; 2. re-audit the five frozen Terraform documents in document order; 3. inspect only the five records’ direct frozen responses after source audit; 4. construct and validate the complete subset C fragment in memory. Task 1 was in_progress; tasks 2–4 were pending. 🟡 (22:54) Inspection of /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json found that the full adjudication schema requires schema_version: 1, design_status: "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication", and records with fields record_id, source_url, decision, accepted_from, reviewer_ids, source_audit, rationale, evidence_limitations, unresolved_reason, claim_evidence_refs, final_coding, and graph_edge_revision. 🟡 (22:54) The schema defines valid claim-evidence fields as record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, and body_patch_relation; each claim reference must contain exactly field, source_id, and quote. 🟡 (22:54) The schema defines source_audit with exactly inspected_before_codings, source_ids, and evidence_bounds; evidence_bounds requires source_text_truncated, files_listing_complete, patch_selection_truncated, and patch_unavailable_count. 🟡 (22:54) The schema defines graph_edge_revision through $defs/edge_revision with exactly basis, added, and removed; basis may be luna_a, luna_b, terra_advisory, or null. 🟡 (22:54) Inspection located validate_adjudication_fragment at line 539 of /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py. 🟡 (22:54) validate_adjudication_fragment constructs a subset schema requiring exactly the top-level fields schema_version, design_status, reviewers, and records; it requires at least one reviewer and one record, unique known record IDs in frozen document order, and at least one listed reviewer with role source_adjudicator for each record. 🟡 (22:54) _validate_record requires source_audit.source_ids to exactly equal all frozen document source IDs in their original order and source_audit.evidence_bounds to exactly equal the document’s frozen evidence_bounds; bounded evidence requires a nonempty evidence_limitations. 🟡 (22:54) _validate_record enforces accept semantics: accepted_from must be one of luna_a, luna_b, or terra_advisory; that frozen response must have schema_valid: true; final_coding must equal the selected response; and graph_edge_revision.basis must equal accepted_from. 🟡 (22:54) _validate_record enforces graph diffs via graph_edge_diff: added and removed must be exactly derived by comparing canonicalized power_changes against the selected baseline response, or against no baseline when basis is null. 🟡 (22:54) _validate_record requires all non-null institutional coding fields to be grounded by valid claim references and validates every claim or edge quote as a literal substring of its named source in the frozen document; unknown source IDs are rejected. 🟡 (22:54) The validator treats effective_institutional_change, announced_institutional_change, and proposal_only as institutional classes; permitted edge statuses are respectively effective, announced, and proposed/rejected/unclear. 🟡 (22:54) The validator requires abstentions to have final_coding: null, a nonempty unresolved_reason, and graph_edge_revision: null; resolved decisions require a coding and graph revision and must have unresolved_reason: null. 🟡 (22:54) Reviewer validation permits reviewer types human, llm, and human_llm_assisted, roles source_adjudicator, evidence_auditor, and synthesizer, and explicitly rejects model names containing gemini. 🟡 (22:54) Frozen input pins embedded in src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py include workflow_run_id: 33063470968, artifact_id: 9642983578, artifact_sha256: "1f6be91fcd98e43e99d82d5f274536f6c23616e7e6c711e26324a2cc4b06ef06", documents_sha256: "d70f7f795847968339a645b6dbd6d4428af6bd6044de44fa2602d4c4343b0ee9", documents_file_sha256: "2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce", coding_package_file_sha256: "14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769", protocol_sha256: "06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933", coding_schema_sha256: "bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e", and adjudication_schema_sha256: "6181f5cb60a0462f83be00be301763daa89f11581e68ee1c46a84e8bf4e5be31".