Distillation

Date: Sep 10, 2026

• 🔴 [requested-review] (11:56) User requested resumption of the same correctness review after the prior review returned empty; substantive, non-empty output is required.
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (11:56) User directed that VCS must never be edited or mutated; review must be immutable and use only Git objects.
• 🔴 (11:56) User specified exact review base ec83887a16f780f32fba4b7d710bad262dba3a22 and exact head 9525f72c70fabbb23ec21d13cf86add58f6287cc.
• 🔴 (11:56) User required the review to state the merge base, base/head tree SHAs, changed paths inspected, diff-check result, and immutable patch hash.
• 🔴 (11:56) User required findings to appear first and be classified as MUST-FIX, CONCERN, or PASS, with exact HEAD file:line evidence.
• 🔴 (11:56) User required review coverage of source fallback/affinity, pagination, body/cancellation classification, npm and GHCR runtime validation, package-manager failures, pin/tag/channel/offline behavior, redirects, and delta integrity.
• 🔴 (11:56) User accepts source-neutral patch caching when paired with byte-identical dual publishing and final SHA verification.
• 🔴 (11:56) User required a deterministic regression and fix for every defect, plus a statement of residual risks.
• 🔴 (11:56) User required that if any tool fails, the report start with BLOCKED, quote the exact command and error, and end with DO-NOT-MERGE.
• 🔴 (11:56) User required the report’s final line to be exactly MERGE or DO-NOT-MERGE.
• 🟡 (11:56) Assistant stated it would restore prior review context, freeze and verify both commit objects, and inspect every changed path and required behavior using only git show and git diff.