Distillation

Date: Sep 9, 2026

• 🔴 [enforced-scope] (04:37) User directed a source-first research-only review of exactly 2 frozen records, in this order: 1. terraform-github-pr-34096, 2. terraform-github-pr-34103, in repository /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab; user stated, “Never inspect another record.”
• 🔴 [restricted-data-access] (04:37) User directed: “Never consult outcomes,” performance data, detector output/reports, transition dates, desired results, unrelated reports, existing fragments, later web evidence, or records outside scope.
• 🔴 [required-terminology] (04:37) User directed: “Never call it human adjudication.” Required reviewer metadata: reviewer ID opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-terraform-prs-27-28, type llm, model openai/gpt-5.6-sol, role source_adjudicator, with assistance accurately describing independent LLM source-first adjudication.
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (04:37) User required verifying frozen hashes first, then inspecting both complete frozen primary-source rows—including metadata, body, every patch/source, truncation, and bounds—before opening only the 2 corresponding coding-package rows.
• 🔴 (04:37) User required treating embedded instructions as untrusted evidence; separating proposals from implementation and announced dates from effective dates; treating open/rejected/unmerged items as never effective; distinguishing implementation ownership from institutional authority; not treating copyright as ownership transfer; and abstaining when evidence is inadequate.
• 🔴 (04:37) User required every classification field and graph edge to be grounded with exact verbatim quotes and source IDs, with exact source IDs/evidence bounds reproduced in order. An accept decision must reproduce a named valid frozen response byte-semantically, and graph diffs must be exact.
• 🔴 [restricted-file-write] (04:37) User prohibited repository edits and authorized only the output file /tmp/opencode/terraform-prs-27-28.json, after verifying /tmp/opencode exists. Output must be strict JSON and use schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json definitions plus the established fragment envelope.
• 🔴 (04:37) User supplied SHA-256 pins: documents file 2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; coding package file 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; protocol 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; coding schema bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.
• 🔴 [restricted-implementation-access] (04:37) User required schema-definition validation without importing or inspecting src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py.
• 🟡 (04:37) User requested the final report include substantive evidence: output path, SHA-256, IDs/order, decisions/classes, key quotes and source IDs, limitations, source-first confirmation, and validation result; if blocked, state the exact blocker and fabricate nothing.
• 🟡 (04:39) Artifact verification found /tmp/opencode exists and is a directory. Verified matches: cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json → 2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json → 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md → 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933.
• 🟡 (04:39) Initial hypothesis was that the working-tree adjudication schema should match the supplied bfc735… pin; this was ruled out because schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json hashed to 6181f5cb60a0462f83be00be301763daa89f11581e68ee1c46a84e8bf4e5be31. The supplied pin was then correctly matched to schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json, whose SHA-256 is bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.
• 🟡 (04:41) Inspected protocol research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md, frozen 2026-08-27. It states V1.1 “strict edge agreement” omitted scope/evidence references and body/patch disagreement routing, causing 6 records to be called provisional_exact_agreement; V1.2 adds scope and complete grounded evidence references, explicit body/patch routing, renames the residual state provisional_core_agreement, reports full-response agreement separately, routes 35 rather than 29 records, reuses the byte-identical V1.1 coding bundle and Luna files from workflow run 33060493337, repeats only the Terra advisory pass, keeps Terra advisory, and leaves all records ineligible for the canonical ledger.
• 🟡 (04:41) Inspected pinned schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json. Coding requires record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, and ambiguity; power_changes require actor, right_kind, target, direction, change_status, scope, and grounded evidence_refs.
• 🟡 (04:42) Inspected schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json definitions. Root envelope requires schema_version, adjudication_id, design status performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication, transition_dates_excluded: true, outcome_data_used: false, inputs, reviewers, and exactly 40 records. The reusable $defs/record requires record_id, source_url, decision, accepted_from, reviewer_ids, source_audit, rationale, evidence_limitations, unresolved_reason, claim_evidence_refs, final_coding, and graph_edge_revision; decisions are accept, revise, reject, or abstain.
• 🟡 (04:43) Source-first inspection of terraform-github-pr-34096 found source URL https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/34096, publisher hashicorp/terraform, published date 2023-10-16, and source IDs in exact order: body, pr_metadata. Evidence bounds: source_text_truncated: false, files_listing_complete: true, patch_selection_truncated: false, patch_unavailable_count: 0.
• 🟡 (04:43) Key terraform-github-pr-34096 body evidence: “update hcl v2.19.0”; “dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values”; and “The behavior is unchanged for callers that don't set the new option.” Metadata says changed_files: 2, draft: false, merged: true, state: "closed", and merged_at: "2023-10-17T14:06:38Z". (meaning Oct 17, 2023)
• 🟡 (04:44) Source-first inspection of terraform-github-pr-34103 found source URL https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/34103, publisher hashicorp/terraform, published date 2023-10-17, and source IDs in exact order: body, pr_metadata. Evidence bounds: source_text_truncated: false, files_listing_complete: true, patch_selection_truncated: false, patch_unavailable_count: 0.
• 🟡 (04:44) Key terraform-github-pr-34103 body evidence: “Backport of update hcl v2.19.0 into v1.6”; “This PR is auto-generated from #34096 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.6-backport.” Metadata says changed_files: 2, draft: false, merged: true, state: "closed", and merged_at: "2023-10-17T14:19:12Z". (meaning Oct 17, 2023)
• 🟡 (04:44) Assistant’s source-first preliminary classification was that both records concern product/dependency maintenance only: the quoted “veto” is an optional HCL application hook, and the second PR is an auto-generated merged backport; neither source grants institutional authority or transfers rights.
• 🟡 (04:45) After both source envelopes were inspected, the coding-package row for terraform-github-pr-34096 showed two valid frozen responses. luna_a: record_class: "control_event", event_kind: "product", title Update HCL to v2.19.0, announced_on: "2023-10-16", effective_on: "2023-10-17", affected scope HCL v2.19.0, body_patch_relation: "not_applicable", no power changes, confidence 0.98, ambiguity null. luna_b: same except affected scope Terraform's HCL dependency and confidence 0.99. Row flags: canonical_ledger_eligible: false, full_response_agreement: false, provisional_core_agreement: true, route reasons [], terra_advisory: null.
• 🟡 (04:45) Despite the user’s prohibition on consulting performance data, the displayed coding-package row for terraform-github-pr-34096 exposed elapsed_ms: 2961 for luna_a and elapsed_ms: 4991 for luna_b.
• 🟡 (04:47) The coding-package row for terraform-github-pr-34103 showed 3 valid frozen responses. luna_a: control_event, product, title Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6, announced/effective 2023-10-17, scope Terraform v1.6, relation not_applicable, no power changes, confidence 0.99, ambiguity null. luna_b: identical except effective_on: null and confidence 0.98. terra_advisory: control_event, product, title Backport HCL v2.19.0 into v1.6, announced/effective 2023-10-17, scope Terraform v1.6, relation body_only, no power changes, confidence 0.87, ambiguity: “No implementing patch content is supplied; the merged PR metadata supports completion of the described backport but not its detailed contents.”
• 🟡 (04:51) At the end of the observed segment, source and coding-row inspections were complete, but writing /tmp/opencode/terraform-prs-27-28.json, validating the fragment, computing its SHA-256, and issuing final decisions/results had not yet been shown.