Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Distillation
445befca-fb9d-4fd9-920a-6120b4688415["lore_tm_v1_HvXJQ5-kc6fXWE5eAJd_LLR6hBCOkNf4JppdHoG1GKQ"]
Date: Sep 8, 2026
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-a2.json. It is a fragment with schema_version=1, design_status="performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication", 1 reviewer, and 4 records in order: 1. opentofu-github-issue-340, 2. opentofu-github-pr-1010, 3. opentofu-github-pr-1107, 4. opentofu-github-pr-1152.reviewer_id="opencode-sol-opentofu-a2", reviewer_type="llm", model="openai/gpt-5.6-sol", role="source_adjudicator", with assistance "Source-first review of four frozen OpenTofu records".opentofu-github-issue-340 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340), accepts luna_b; reviewer is opencode-sol-opentofu-a2. Source audit inspected ["body"] before coding, with files_listing_complete=null, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0, and source_text_truncated=false.opentofu-github-issue-340 rationale: the issue proposes enabling a repository discussion feature but provides no implementation or organizational-rights change, so a product-feature proposal is not an institutional or control event. Limitation: only the issue body is frozen, without issue-state, comments, closing, or implementation evidence showing whether GitHub Discussions was later enabled.opentofu-github-issue-340 claim evidence: record_class → body quote "We could enable github discussions to have a sort of forum with minimal effort from the admin and great value to the community/maintainers."; title → "Open up github discussions on this repo"; affected_scope → "Enable github discussions for this repo."; body_patch_relation → "### Summary".opentofu-github-issue-340 final coding: record_class="no_event", event_kind=null, title "Proposal to enable GitHub Discussions", announced_on=null, effective_on=null, affected scope "opentofu/opentofu repository", body_patch_relation="body_only", no power changes, confidence=0.98, and ambiguity=null. Graph-edge revision uses basis="luna_b" with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-1010 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1010), accepts luna_b; reviewer is opencode-sol-opentofu-a2. Source audit inspected ["body","pr_metadata","patch:0"] before coding, with files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0, and source_text_truncated=false.opentofu-github-pr-1010 rationale: the merged meeting summary records TSC product decisions concerning the registry namespace and GA timing, but neither changes organizational rights nor proves the January GA release occurred; the body and sole changed-file patch consistently describe the summary. Limitation: the complete, available patch records meeting decisions only and provides no downstream release or product-implementation evidence.opentofu-github-pr-1010 claim evidence: record_class → patch:0 quote "**Vote:** Should we (a) Release GA on Dec 20th if ready as soft launch and launch marketing in Jan 10th (b) Release on Dec 20th (c) Release on Jan 10th [note on all options, we expect an RC at least a week prior to GA]"; event_kind → patch:0 quote "Launch date of GA"; title evidence → body quote "Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-11" plus patch:0 quotes "Changing default registry namespace to opentofu" and "Launch date of GA"; announced_on → pr_metadata quote "\"merged_at\": \"2023-12-14T10:19:23Z\""; affected-scope evidence → patch:0 quotes "Changing default registry namespace to opentofu" and "Launch date of GA"; body/patch relation → body quote "Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-11" and patch:0 quote "## 2023-12-11".opentofu-github-pr-1010 final coding: record_class="control_event", event_kind="product", title "TSC summary covering registry namespace and GA launch decisions", announced_on="2023-12-14", effective_on=null, affected scope "OpenTofu registry namespace and GA launch timing", body_patch_relation="consistent", no power changes, confidence=0.98, and ambiguity=null. Graph-edge revision uses basis="luna_b" with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-1107 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1107), accepts luna_a; reviewer is opencode-sol-opentofu-a2. Source audit inspected ["body","pr_metadata","patch:0"] before coding, with files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0, and source_text_truncated=false.opentofu-github-pr-1107 rationale: the body and selected patch consistently describe technical-preview product work on static evaluation; because the pull request is draft, closed, and unmerged, it proves neither effective implementation nor an institutional-rights change. Limitation: the envelope contains one selected patch for internal/command/apply.go despite metadata reporting 23 changed files; the selection is marked untruncated with no unavailable selected patch, but cannot support claims about all changed files, while closed/unmerged status is explicit.opentofu-github-pr-1107 claim evidence: record_class → body quote "Current state of this work: Technical Preview. Most components should be functional, but may have unexpected bugs or limitations." and pr_metadata quotes "\"draft\": true" and "\"merged\": false"; event_kind → body quote "This is the initial implementation of a static evaluation context that can be used to evaluate expression that do not rely on any state data (vars/locals only)."; title and affected_scope → body quote "Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends"; announced_on → record_metadata quote "\"published_on\":\"2024-01-11\""; body/patch relation → body quote "This is the initial implementation of a static evaluation context" and patch:0 quote "c.GatherVariables(args.Vars)".opentofu-github-pr-1107 final coding: record_class="control_event", event_kind="product", title "Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends", announced_on="2024-01-11", effective_on=null, affected scope "module sources and backends", body_patch_relation="consistent", no power changes, confidence=0.97, and ambiguity "The pull request is closed and unmerged, so implementation effectiveness is not shown." Graph-edge revision uses basis="luna_a" with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-1152 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1152), accepts luna_a; reviewer is opencode-sol-opentofu-a2. Source audit inspected ["body","pr_metadata","patch:0"] before coding, with files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0, and source_text_truncated=false.opentofu-github-pr-1152 rationale: the merged patch adds repository documentation of the TSC’s stated authority and current membership, but the body says the information was already referenced elsewhere; therefore it documents existing governance rather than creating or transferring an organizational right or demonstrating a membership change. Limitation: the complete, available sole changed-file patch does not establish when or how the documented TSC authority or membership originally took effect, so the merge cannot date that institutional change.opentofu-github-pr-1152 claim evidence: record_class → body quote "This information has been referenced in a few places, but it is good to have a clear description in the repo to help explain the issue flow and governance."; title → body quote "Add details on who/what/why the TSC is and list of current members"; affected_scope → patch:0 quote "The Technical Steering Committee is a group comprised of people from companies and projects backing OpenTofu."; body/patch relation → body quote "Add details on who/what/why the TSC is and list of current members" and patch:0 quote "The current members of the steering committee are:".opentofu-github-pr-1152 final coding: record_class="no_event", event_kind=null, title "TSC governance summary added", announced_on=null, effective_on=null, affected scope "OpenTofu Technical Steering Committee documentation", body_patch_relation="consistent", no power changes, confidence=0.93, and ambiguity "The merged patch documents the TSC's existing decision authority and membership but does not show that organizational rights changed." Graph-edge revision uses basis="luna_a" with no added or removed edges.