Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Distillation
497650b7-e90e-4ffa-874d-7b402b6b2c38["lore_tm_v1_acjApOmO-WZBX9yreBsDCJUbusLcKrnFnIYWKOwyOAs","lore_tm_v1_VMAW0sytgWMn3ZegGBJr4bH9hbkimL6DuUoq2cGS54c","lore_tm_v1_C72DX8eUcbVeQsDTcBOik_X9VUZ3EYpsAa6OtKInaCI","lore_tm_v1_Iq-BduBm_Boydtxj7hytrgHm09hbFezEfYzs-4G0ovk","lore_tm_v1_b0qXnKtQQIyXAMVNVUByp2IHGEVu5S7eUATeaUq4wqY"]
Date: September 8, 2026
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md states V1.1 used the frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders, but 6 records were incorrectly labeled provisional_exact_agreement because the evaluator omitted edge scope and evidence references and did not route body/patch-relationship disagreements.provisional_core_agreement; full-response agreement is reported separately but not required because titles and numeric confidence are not canonical research fields.33060493337, and repeats only the Terra advisory pass over the corrected route to isolate evaluator changes from model sampling variance.jq: error (at /tmp/opencode/institutional-transition-adjudication-9642983578/documents.json:1714): Cannot iterate over null (null)./tmp/opencode/institutional-transition-adjudication-9642983578/documents.json has a top-level object with keys coding_id, coding_schema_sha256, design_status, documents, model_input_fields, outcome_data_used, schema_version, and transition_dates_excluded; document entries expose entity_id, evidence_bounds, published_on, publisher, record_id, source_type, source_url, and sources.valkey-github-issue-3289, published March 2, 2026, proposes a Valkey Improvement Proposal (VIP) process for major Core, Modules, Clients, and Tooling changes; anyone intending to drive or contribute to implementation could initiate a VIP.[DISCUSS] VIP-{number} {heading} thread in Valkey Contributors Slack and iterate publicly; 4. Call a [VOTE] after finalization; 5. Update the VIP page/index with Accepted or Rejected status and report the result in the voting thread.+1 votes and no binding vetoes; Lazy Majority = 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than -1; Lazy Approval = implicitly allowed unless a -1 triggers lazy majority or lazy consensus; 2/3 Majority = at least two-thirds of binding vote holders, active committers or TSC members, voting +1, reserved for foundational changes. The lifecycle text describes voting as open for a minimum of 72/96 hours.valkey-io/valkey-skills repository.valkey-skills proposal reports 15 skills, 281 files, and 37K lines of source-verified material. Benchmarks reported: valkey Sonnet 4.6 improved from 6/14 to 10/14 and Opus 4.6 from 5/14 to 10/14; valkey-dev Sonnet 4.6 improved from 8/12 to 11/12; valkey-ops Opus 4.6 Helm performance improved from 16/19 at $2.50 to 18/19 at $1.57, 37% cheaper, while Sonnet 4.6 config performance improved from 16/22 to 17/22.valkey-skills candidates were removed after showing no benchmark improvement: valkey-module-dev because the Rust crate was already in training data; valkey-json-dev because C++ was navigable without guidance; and the query syntax skill because its syntax was identical to RediSearch.valkey-skills governance and maintenance: use the standard valkey-io model with its own MAINTAINERS.md and PR workflow; the proposal author would be initial maintainer and handle skill architecture, routing, and formatting; server maintainers would validate server skills and GLIDE maintainers would validate GLIDE skills.valkey-skills update and quality controls: CI-based version tracking; release PRs automatically open issues containing release notes; commit-based versioning allows users to pin Valkey versions; tags and immutable releases provide anchors; agnix reports 0 errors and 0 warnings; source verification uses repo-intel and consumer plugins; additions must demonstrate value through reproducible benchmarks.valkey-skills repository-structure alternatives, in order: A. Cross-link only—no new governed repo, but unofficial and less discoverable; B. Single valkey-io/valkey-skills repository—recommended for unified discovery, quality tooling, and centralized specialist architecture, despite requiring a new governed repo; C. Distribute skills among valkey, valkey-glide, and other repositories—puts skills beside code but risks fragmentation, inconsistency, and no natural home for cross-cutting migration material; D. Phased adoption—start with valkey, GLIDE, valkey-dev, and ops, but risks delaying already benchmarked material. Recommendation: B, with D as a stepping stone if gradual adoption is preferred.valkey-skills next steps, in order: 1. Distill key knowledge and prewritten diagnostics into an official marketplace skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot; 2. Build extensions for VS Code, Neovim, JetBrains, and Zed; 3. Synchronize skill updates with Valkey, GLIDE, and module releases.valkey-github-issue-4276 is explicitly marked source_text_truncated=true; the visible text proposes valkey-io/valkey-samples as an official, governed repository for cookbooks, demos, and sample apps, with self-contained directories and mandatory CI validation.valkey-samples acceptance criteria require: 1. Clean-clone builds with public, pinned dependencies; 2. Compatibility with the current stable Valkey release and no unreleased branches, unstable Docker tags, or non-GA flags; 3. Focus on Valkey features and patterns; 4. Current stable client libraries with documented rationale; 5. Vendor-neutral defaults, with vendor-specific variants covering at least 2 providers equally or linking to provider docs; 6. A README covering purpose, versioned prerequisites, run steps, expected output, and Valkey documentation links; 7. CI validation on every PR for dependency installation, compilation/linting, and successful execution against Valkey.valkey-samples structure includes top-level README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, LICENSE, and MAINTAINERS.md; content directories cookbooks/, demos/, and samples/; and .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/new-sample.md, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.md, .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, .github/workflows/validate-samples.yml, .github/workflows/lint-markdown.yml, and .github/workflows/label-sync.yml.valkey-samples structural decisions: each sample directory is independently runnable; content is categorized as cookbooks/, demos/, or samples/; there are no nested language directories, with language instead included in names such as cache-aside-python/ and cache-aside-java/.valkey-github-issue-4508: proposed @langchain/valkey capabilities include KNN and range vector search, TAG/TEXT/NUMERIC metadata filtering, custom index schemas, batch pipeline writes, escaped TAG values against query injection, configurable index prefixes, and COSINE/IP/L2 distance metrics. Existing code in daric93/langchainjs branch feature/valkey-vector-store, directory libs/providers/langchain-valkey/, would need standalone CI, governance documents, and a release pipeline.valkey-github-issue-4509: proposed n8n-nodes-valkey operations are Insert, Load, Get, and Retrieve as Tool; architecture delegates vector operations to prerequisite package @langchain/valkey, while the n8n node handles UI configuration, credentials, and workflow integration.n8n-nodes-valkey target capabilities: KNN and range vector search through n8n’s visual builder; TAG/TEXT/NUMERIC metadata filtering; automatic embedding through n8n Embeddings sub-nodes; retrieval as an Agent Tool for RAG; and support for self-hosted Valkey plus managed offerings including AWS ElastiCache, GCP Memorystore, and Aiven.n8n-nodes-valkey alternatives considered: fixing n8n’s existing Redis node—rejected by the n8n team; using the LangChain Code Node workaround—rejected because it requires JavaScript, is self-hosted-only, and lacks visual integration; hosting under a personal GitHub organization—rejected because it reduces discoverability, trust, official endorsement, and the long-term-maintenance signal relevant to n8n verification.