Distillation

Date: Aug 29, 2026

• 🟡 (12:21) Diff review showed .github/workflows/publish.yml removes the target-repository checkout-branch exceptions and instead checks out getsentry/${{ fromJSON(steps.inputs.outputs.result).repo }} at ${{ steps.release-revision.outputs.revision }} with fetch-depth: 0; it performs conditional workspace discovery, supplies CRAFT_WORKSPACE_NAMES, sets CRAFT_PUBLISH_WORKSPACE: ${{ fromJSON(steps.location.outputs.result).workspace || '' }}, and publishes through craft publish <version> --rev ${{ steps.release-revision.outputs.revision }}.
• 🔴 (12:21) User stated new Craft requests always include the checkout repository identity.
• 🔴 (12:21) User stated Craft never normalizes workspace names; it preserves exact spelling.
• 🟡 (12:21) Diff review showed docs/publish-issue-format.md documents root workspace releases as a trailing one-segment workspace suffix; rejects workspaces with non-root checkout paths; requires new workspace names to match ^[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+$; resolves suffixes only after checking out the exact CI-approved View check runs revision and listing workspace keys from root .craft.yml; treats absent .craft.yml as checkout-path behavior; fails releases on discovery errors with root configuration; retains JSON-qualified legacy titles only for compatibility; requires legacy ] @ spacing and no space before @ in unqualified titles; permits optional getsentry/ when parsing existing issues; and forbids .. path segments.
• 🟡 (12:21) Assistant identified a documentation gap: the canonical grammar syntactically permits a legacy path, but semantic validation rejects a legacy workspace with that path. It planned to document this boundary explicitly, rerun full checks, then request a fresh read-only adversarial review.
• 🟡 (12:25) ../publish-workspace-acceptance/docs/publish-issue-format.md was updated to document the legacy-path semantic-validation boundary.
• 🟡 (12:26) Assistant stated the contract documentation was consistent and planned complete controller verification followed by new adversarial review before any commit or PR update.
• 🟡 (12:29) Full controller verification passed in /home/byk/Code/getsentry/publish-workspace-acceptance: yarn check:generated && vitest run passed with 8 test files and 45 tests under Vitest 4.1.0; ESLint passed via eslint src .github --ignore-pattern '!.github'; Prettier reported All matched files use Prettier code style!.
• 🟡 (12:30) Assistant reported full Publish verification green: 45 tests, ESLint, generated-parser freshness, formatting, and git diff --check; it requested a fresh read-only adversarial review before committing either branch.
• 🟡 (12:32) An independent background review task ses_fb280c221ffeC3FzWkFnJrtcF3 started and remained running; task instructions prohibited polling, status requests, or duplicating its work.
• 🟡 (12:33) Assistant stated the independent review covers both uncommitted worktrees and will assess the revised latest contract, CI-revision binding, legacy compatibility, state parity, parser freshness, and commit hygiene; it will act on findings before any commit or PR update.