Distillation

🔴 (17:15) User directive/preference: Never return empty output. 🔴 (17:15) [requested-review] User requested a READ-ONLY independent audit of /home/byk/Code/getsentry/publish, comparing the exact current worktree against origin/main. 🔴 (17:15) User prohibited editing, formatting, generating, staging, or otherwise mutating files during the audit. 🟡 (17:15) User requested a non-empty evidence report limited to exactly five critical questions, with current file:line citations and each answer labeled PASS, CONCERN, or MUST-FIX: 1. Whether any newer unlabeled, malformed, renamed, request-mutated, or re-approved state can still pass approval/ci-ready validation; 2. Whether check-suite or branch-head API failure, revision movement, or a failed ci-ready add can incorrectly advance or strand a release; 3. Whether arbitrary-ref workflow_dispatch or attacker-controlled issue/event data can execute untrusted code with secrets or inject shell commands; 4. Whether the final pre-Craft fence binds the exact approved request/revision and whether actions/Craft are immutable; 5. Whether success, failure, cancellation, and setup failure always deauthorize and reconcile independently of dependencies, comments, and telemetry. 🔴 (17:15) User required that if any tool blocks review, the report begin with BLOCKED and quote the tool’s exact error. 🔴 (17:15) User required the audit report to end exactly with either MERGE or DO-NOT-MERGE. 🟡 (17:15) Assistant stated the audit plan: fingerprint the current tree; enumerate every tracked and untracked delta from origin/main; then trace the five security and lifecycle paths through workflows, source, and tests. 🟡 (17:15) Assistant reported that the required repo-setup skill was unavailable in the session and planned to apply checked-in repository instructions and inspect setup files directly; the assistant stated this did not block the read-only audit.