Distillation

🔴 (09:16) User supplied /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/valkey-31-33.json, a 249-line fragment with schema_version: 1, design_status: "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication", one reviewer, and three records. 🔴 (09:16) In valkey-31-33.json, reviewer opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1 is an llm using openai/gpt-5.6-sol, role source_adjudicator, with assistance "Source-first review of three frozen Valkey issue records". 🔴 (09:16) Record valkey-github-issue-2961, source https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/2961, has decision revise, accepted_from: null, reviewer opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1, and unresolved_reason: null. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-2961 source audit inspected only body before codings; bounds are files_listing_complete: null, patch_selection_truncated: false, patch_unavailable_count: 0, and source_text_truncated: false. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-2961 rationale says the issue requests a kernel-level hot-key feature and offers to share an implementation later, but shows neither implementation nor an organizational-rights change; Terra’s classification is retained while body_patch_relation is revised because the frozen record has a body and no patch. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-2961 evidence limitation says the frozen envelope contains only the untruncated issue body and no issue-state, comment, decision, pull-request, or implementation evidence. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-2961 claim evidence references quote "If anyone is interested, I can share my implementation later." for record_class; "[NEW] Valkey kernel-level hot key detection function" for title; and "**Description of the feature**" for body_patch_relation. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-2961 final coding is record_class: "no_event", event_kind: null, title "Valkey kernel-level hot key detection function request", announced_on: null, effective_on: null, affected_scope: null, body_patch_relation: "body_only", empty power_changes, confidence: 0.99, and ambiguity: null; graph revision uses basis: "terra_advisory" with no additions or removals. 🔴 (09:16) Record valkey-github-issue-3289, source https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/3289, has decision accept, accepted_from: "terra_advisory", reviewer opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1, and unresolved_reason: null. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 source audit inspected only body before codings; bounds are files_listing_complete: null, patch_selection_truncated: false, patch_unavailable_count: 0, and source_text_truncated: false. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 rationale says the issue explicitly proposes a formal Valkey Improvement Proposal (VIP) lifecycle and binding voting rules, but supplies no evidence that Valkey adopted or implemented them, so the voting right remains proposed rather than effective. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 evidence limitation says the frozen envelope contains only the untruncated issue body and no issue-state, comment, vote result, merged policy, or implementation evidence. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 claim evidence references quote "Introduce a **Valkey Improvement Proposal (VIP)** process, a formalized framework for proposing, discussing, and voting on major changes to the Valkey project." for record_class; "The process would follow a defined lifecycle:" for event_kind; "Valkey Improvement Proposals (VIP)" for title; "\"published_on\":\"2026-03-02\"" from record_metadata for announced_on; "As Valkey continues to grow, the project lacks a formal, structured process for proposing, discussing, and approving major changes to its Core, Modules, Clients, and Tooling." for affected_scope; and "**Description of the feature**" for body_patch_relation. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 final coding is record_class: "proposal_only", event_kind: "control_rights", title "Valkey Improvement Proposals (VIP)", announced_on: "2026-03-02", effective_on: null, affected_scope: "Major changes to Valkey's Core, Modules, Clients, and Tooling", body_patch_relation: "body_only", confidence: 0.98, and ambiguity "The issue proposes the VIP process; no evidence shows it was adopted or implemented.". 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 proposes adding a vote right to "binding vote holders (active committers or TSC members)" for the "VIP approval process" targeting "foundational changes to the project"; evidence specifies that at least 2/3 of binding vote holders must vote +1, with this threshold reserved for foundational changes. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3289 graph-edge revision uses basis: "terra_advisory" with no additions or removals. 🔴 (09:16) Record valkey-github-issue-3441, source https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/3441, has decision revise, accepted_from: null, reviewer opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1, and unresolved_reason: null. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441 source audit inspected only body before codings; bounds are files_listing_complete: null, patch_selection_truncated: false, patch_unavailable_count: 0, and source_text_truncated: false. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441 rationale says the issue recommends placing a valkey-skills repository under valkey-io, but offers alternatives and leaves the choice to the TSC; it supports only a proposed repository-ownership right, not an effective transfer, foundation transfer, or broader organizational authority. Terra’s coding is revised only to add the frozen proposal publication date. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441 evidence limitation says the frozen envelope contains only the untruncated issue body and no issue-state, comment, TSC decision, repository transfer, repository creation, or implementation evidence. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441 claim evidence references quote "**Option B: Single repository under valkey-io (recommended)** - Transfer or recreate as \valkey-io/valkey-skills`."forrecord_class; "Maintenance model: Same as any valkey-io repo. Own `MAINTAINERS.md`, PR-based workflow."forevent_kind; "[NEW] AI Skills for the Valkey Ecosystem"fortitle; ""published_on":"2026-04-03""fromrecord_metadataforannounced_on; "This issue addresses three questions: governance, target users, and recommendations."foraffected_scope; and "Description of the feature"forbody_patch_relation. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441final coding isrecord_class: "proposal_only", event_kind: "control_rights", title "Proposal for valkey-io/valkey-skills repository", announced_on: "2026-04-03", effective_on: null, affected_scope: "Valkey skills repository governance", body_patch_relation: "body_only", confidence: 0.89, and ambiguity "The proposal permits either transfer or recreation, so no removal of ownership from the existing repository is established.". 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441proposes addingvalkey-io’s ownright over scope"repository ownership and governance"and target"valkey-io/valkey-skills", based on recommended Option B to transfer or recreate the repository under valkey-io. 🔴 (09:16) valkey-github-issue-3441graph-edge revision usesbasis: "terra_advisory"with no additions or removals. 🔴 (09:16) User stated that the frozen Terraform evidence proves Terraform-side EULA enforcement from the merge date but"never proves when Chef Software's underlying EULA policy became effective.". 🔴 (09:16) User supplied the source assertion "Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept Chef EULA.". 🔴 (09:16) For terraform-github-pr-34847, user supplied the rationale that source-address parsing, package movement, tests, and dependency pruning concern software responsibility and compatibility behavior, "never organizational authority."; accepted coding treats the merged scoped work as a technical product control event with no power-graph edge. 🔴 (09:16) User supplied the rationale for a closed, unmerged AI-agent-governance PR: the complete patch set proposes repository instructions allowing named AI coding tools to auto-commit after gates pass, so it is only a proposed delegation and "never an implemented or adopted policy."`.