Distillation

🔴 (09:36) Updated cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/adjudication.json by appending the adjudication for valkey-github-pr-1788; the patch applied successfully. 🔴 (09:36) valkey-github-pr-1788 was revised by reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-valkey-b; source audit inspected body, pr_metadata, and patch:0 through patch:19, with complete file listing, truncated patch selection, zero unavailable patches, and untruncated source text. 🔴 (09:36) valkey-github-pr-1788 standardized Valkey copyright and SPDX notices and placed license notices “always explicitly first,” even above file documentation. Copyright attribution did not prove ownership or authority transfer, and the retained changes did not establish a licensing-right edge. 🔴 (09:36) valkey-github-pr-1788 metadata reports 31 changed files, but the frozen envelope retains 20 patches; the omitted 11 file patches could not be assessed, so coding was limited to license-header standardization in retained patches rather than a repository-wide claim. 🔴 (09:36) valkey-github-pr-1788 final coding is record_class: "control_event", event_kind: "license", title "Standardized Valkey file license headers", announced_on: "2025-02-27", effective_on: "2025-02-27", affected_scope: "license headers in the retained Valkey file patches", body_patch_relation: "consistent", empty power_changes, confidence: 0.86, and ambiguity that only 20 patches from a 31-file PR are retained and no organizational-rights change is established. 🔴 (09:36) valkey-github-pr-1788 graph revision uses basis: "luna_a" with no additions or removals. 🔴 (09:38) Updated cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/adjudication.json by appending the adjudication for valkey-github-pr-2927; the patch applied successfully. 🔴 (09:38) valkey-github-pr-2927 was revised by reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-valkey-b; source audit inspected body, pr_metadata, and patch:0, with complete file listing, no patch-selection or source-text truncation, and zero unavailable patches. 🔴 (09:38) valkey-github-pr-2927’s merged governance patch modifies TSC membership composition, technical-major-decision approval, governance-major-decision approval, involuntary member removal, and delegation procedure. The patch supersedes the body’s simple-majority description for non-technical decisions by classifying governance matters and requiring a two-thirds vote. 🔴 (09:38) valkey-github-pr-2927 final coding is record_class: "effective_institutional_change", event_kind: "board_or_steering", title "Valkey TSC membership and major-decision rules revised", announced_on: "2025-12-11", effective_on: "2025-12-12", affected_scope: "Valkey Technical Steering Committee membership and major-decision procedures", body_patch_relation: "patch_supersedes_body", confidence: 0.98, and ambiguity that the merged patch’s 2/3 requirement for Governance Major Decisions controls over the body’s simple-majority description. 🔴 (09:38) valkey-github-pr-2927 final power_changes, in order, are: 1. effective modified approve relation for actor TSC, target technical major decisions, scope Valkey technical major decisions, using simple majority whenever obtainable; 2. effective added approve relation for TSC, target technical major decisions, scope technical major decisions lacking a simple majority after two weeks and receiving no negative TSC vote, allowing explicit +2 support from at least two TSC members; 3. effective modified approve relation for TSC, target governance major decisions, scope Valkey governance major decisions, requiring a 2/3 affirmative vote of the entire TSC; 4. effective modified set_membership relation for TSC, target TSC membership composition, scope TSC organization-affiliation composition, limiting one organization or affiliated organizations to no more than 1/3 of members; 5. effective modified remove relation for TSC, target TSC members, scope Involuntary removal of TSC members, using the Governance Major Decision process; 6. effective modified delegate relation for TSC, target decision making for other projects within the Valkey organization, scope other projects within the Valkey organization, subject to Governance Major Decision approval. 🔴 (09:38) valkey-github-pr-2927 graph revision uses basis: "luna_a"; it adds the no-opposition +2 technical-major-decision approval path and the modified delegation relation, and removes Luna A’s modified approve relation for actor TSC, target delegation of decision making for projects, scope Projects within the Valkey organization. 🔴 (09:39) Supplied a patch to append the adjudication for valkey-github-pr-345 to cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/adjudication.json; the update succeeded at 09:41. 🔴 (09:39) valkey-github-pr-345 was revised by reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-valkey-b; source audit inspected body, pr_metadata, and patch:0 through patch:2, with complete file listing, no patch-selection or source-text truncation, and zero unavailable patches. 🔴 (09:39) valkey-github-pr-345’s merged PR creates the Valkey Technical Steering Committee and expressly gives it authority over technical, project, approval, and policy matters; membership; chair appointment; governance amendments; delegation; and overriding subproject decisions. 🔴 (09:39) valkey-github-pr-345 final coding is record_class: "effective_institutional_change", event_kind: "board_or_steering", title "Valkey governance establishes Technical Steering Committee", announced_on: "2024-04-21", effective_on: "2024-04-30", affected_scope: "Valkey project and all current and future repositories under the Valkey-io organization", body_patch_relation: "consistent", confidence: 0.99, and ambiguity: null. 🔴 (09:39) valkey-github-pr-345 final power_changes, in order, are six effective added relations for actor Technical Steering Committee: 1. set_policy over target technical, project, approval, and policy matters, scope Valkey project; 2. set_membership over target TSC members, scope Valkey project, with additions or removals requiring at least a 2/3 affirmative vote of the current TSC; 3. appoint over target Chair, scope Valkey project; 4. set_policy over target governance document, scope Valkey project governance, with amendments requiring at least a 2/3 affirmative vote; 5. delegate over target decision making for other projects, scope Other projects within the Valkey organization; 6. override over target decisions made by other projects, scope Other projects within the Valkey organization. 🔴 (09:39) valkey-github-pr-345 graph revision uses basis: "luna_b" and adds the effective set_policy relation for the Technical Steering Committee over technical, project, approval, and policy matters across the Valkey project; no edge is removed. 🟡 (09:41) Assistant stated that the adjudication envelope contained all fragment records in frozen order and initiated a standalone JSON-only proof covering exact object equality and preservation of top-level values. 🔴 (09:41) Final standalone verification reported structural_check=PASS, top_level_preserved=true, fragment_count_12=true, fragment_records_40_distinct=true, fragment_ids_equal_frozen_ids=true, canonical_records_40_distinct=true, canonical_order_equals_frozen_order=true, canonical_reviewers_distinct=true, canonical_reviewer_ids_equal_fragments=true, canonical_reviewers_equal_fragment_originals=true, canonical_records_equal_fragment_originals=true, exact_abstentions=true, and canonical_objects_equal_fragment_originals=true. 🔴 (09:41) Final file SHA-256 was 94d88707ac3ed58a499f20610d6b6579fcf2810f16902dde13a1269e4328efd0; totals were record_count=40, reviewer_count=12, and decision_counts={"abstain":4,"accept":25,"reject":3,"revise":8}. 🔴 (09:41) Exact abstention IDs were opentofu-github-pr-2830, opentofu-github-pr-2953, opentofu-github-pr-2959, and valkey-github-issue-4276. 🟡 (09:41) Assistant’s final report stated that only cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/adjudication.json was updated; the standalone structural check passed with 12 fragments, 40 distinct records, 12 distinct reviewers, exact frozen record set and order, exactly preserved top-level canonical fields, reviewer and record objects equal to fragment originals, and decision totals of accept 25, revise 8, reject 3, and abstain 4. 🟡 (09:41) Assistant stated that the final check used standalone JSON and hashing code without reading or importing the validator and that no semantic adjudication was performed by that check.