Distillation

Date: Sep 8, 2026

• 🔴 (23:02) User stated the prior source-review result was empty and required resuming the same assigned scope of frozen records 10–18 only, without reviewing other records or modifying files.
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (23:02) User required inspecting every frozen source component for each assigned record before opening direct frozen coder outputs.
• 🟡 (23:02) User requested one complete JSON fragment containing exactly schema_version, design_status, reviewers, and records, matching cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-a2.json.
• 🔴 (23:02) User required every accept decision to exactly equal its named valid frozen response.
• 🔴 (23:02) User stated records opentofu-github-pr-2830 and opentofu-github-pr-2953 have bounded patch selections; later recovered diffs and user-described supplements are outside the versioned frozen evidence envelope and cannot be used as source evidence. Explicit evidence limitations and abstention are required whenever frozen components cannot support defensible complete coding.
• 🔴 (23:02) User stated: “Never infer power from implementation ownership, copyright notices, or responsibility wording.”
• 🔴 (23:02) User stated: “Never call this human adjudication; record LLM provenance.”
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (23:02) User required validating the complete fragment with validate_adjudication_fragment; only source IDs present in frozen documents may be used, and exact quotes must pass validation.
• 🔴 (23:02) User required inclusion of exact frozen file SHA-256 values and required the response to end with EVIDENCE-COMPLETE or BLOCKED.
• 🔴 (23:02) User stated: “Never return empty”; if blocked, the response must identify the exact file, tool, and error.