Distillation

Date: Sep 9, 2026

• 🟡 (02:15) Created /tmp/opencode/valkey-36-40.json.
• 🟡 (02:15) Inspected validate_adjudication_fragment() in /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py lines 659–754. The fragment schema requires schema_version=1, design_status="performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication", at least 1 reviewer, and at least 1 record; validation also enforces unique reviewer IDs, coding-package IDs matching frozen-document IDs exactly once and in order, unique fragment IDs forming a known subset in frozen-document order, and summary.documents_sha256 == canonical_sha256(documents).
• 🟡 (02:16) Validation of the five-record fragment passed all sources, quotes, coding fields, and rows except valkey-github-pr-2927, which produced 2 errors: graph_edge_revision.added is not derived and graph_edge_revision.removed is not derived.
• 🟡 (02:16) Debugging hypothesis: the PR 2927 failure arose from exact graph-edge identity and ordering rather than the substantive adjudication; planned fix was to replace hand-derived lists with the validator’s canonical diff and rerun the full check.
• 🟡 (02:16) Five-task adjudication status: 1. inspect protocol, schemas, and complete frozen source envelopes for the five assigned records in order — completed, high priority; 2. inspect and compare only direct Luna A, Luna B, and Terra responses — completed, high priority; 3. derive source-grounded final codings and graph-edge revisions — completed, high priority; 4. validate the five-record fragment against frozen inputs and schema — in progress, high priority; 5. return one substantive response with reviewer provenance and all five decisions — pending, high priority.
• 🟡 (02:16) Validator-derived canonical graph_edge_revision.added for valkey-github-pr-2927 contained 4 TSC edges, in order: 1. direction="added", right_kind="approve", target technical major decisions, scope technical major decisions lacking a simple majority after two weeks and receiving no negative TSC vote, evidenced by the two-week voting-period “+2” rule and its prohibition after any negative vote; 2. direction="modified", right_kind="remove", target TSC members, scope involuntary removal of TSC members, evidenced by involuntary removal through the Governance Major Decision process; 3. direction="modified", right_kind="set_membership", target TSC membership composition, scope TSC organization-affiliation composition, evidenced by the one-third affiliation cap and duty to restore compliance; 4. direction="modified", right_kind="delegate", target decision making for other projects within the Valkey organization, scope other projects within the Valkey organization, subject to Governance Major Decision approval, evidenced by delegation to project maintainers and classification of delegation as a Governance Major Decision. All 4 had change_status="effective" and source_id="patch:0".
• 🟡 (02:16) Validator-derived canonical graph_edge_revision.removed for valkey-github-pr-2927 contained 3 TSC edges, in order: 1. modified remove edge targeting TSC members, scope Involuntary removal of TSC members with capitalized “Involuntary”; 2. modified set_membership edge targeting TSC membership composition, scope TSC organization-affiliation composition; 3. modified approve edge targeting delegation of decision making for projects, scope Projects within the Valkey organization with capitalized “Projects”. All 3 had change_status="effective" and source_id="patch:0".
• 🟡 (02:17) Updated /tmp/opencode/valkey-36-40.json with a revised PR 2927 graph diff, but validation still failed with record valkey-github-pr-2927: graph_edge_revision.added is not derived; the .removed error was resolved.
• 🟡 (02:17) The edited PR 2927 record used graph_edge_revision.basis="luna_a". Its added list had only 3 edges—technical-major-decision approve, project-decision delegate, and TSC-composition set_membership—while its removed list had 3 edges—TSC-member remove, TSC-composition set_membership, and project-delegation approve.
• 🟡 (02:17) PR 2927 final-coding context in /tmp/opencode/valkey-36-40.json had confidence=0.98 and ambiguity: “The PR body describes simple-majority voting for non-technical decisions, while the merged patch requires a 2/3 vote for Governance Major Decisions; the merged patch controls.”
• 🟡 (02:17) The next record, valkey-github-pr-345 (https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/pull/345), was coded decision="revise", accepted_from=null, with reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-valkey-b. Its rationale states that the merged PR creates the Valkey TSC and grants authority over project policy, membership, chair appointment, delegation, and override of subproject decisions; Luna B’s complete edge set was retained, but the body/patch relationship was revised to patch_supersedes_body.
• 🟡 (02:18) A further update to /tmp/opencode/valkey-36-40.json still produced record valkey-github-pr-2927: graph_edge_revision.added is not derived.
• 🟡 (02:18) Direct comparison showed the validator-derived PR 2927 added list had exactly 4 edges while the file’s declared added list had exactly 3, and equality was False. The missing declared edge was the modified TSC remove edge for involuntary removal of TSC members; the file also ordered its remaining modified edges as delegate then set_membership, whereas the canonical order was remove, set_membership, then delegate.