Distillation

Date: Sep 9, 2026

• 🔴 [enforced-scope] (04:36) User directed a research-only, source-first review in repository /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab, limited to exactly 2 frozen records in this order: 1. terraform-github-pr-21345, 2. terraform-github-pr-22332; the work replaces part of the twice-empty Terraform B reviewer.
• 🔴 (04:36) User directed: “Never inspect another record.”
• 🔴 (04:36) User directed: “Never consult outcomes,” including performance data, detector output/reports, transition dates, desired results, unrelated reports, existing fragments, later web evidence, and records outside scope.
• 🔴 (04:36) User directed: “Never call it human adjudication.”
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (04:36) User required verification of frozen SHA-256 hashes before inspecting content: documents file 2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; coding package file 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; protocol 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; coding schema bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (04:36) User required inspection of each complete frozen primary-source row—including metadata, body, every patch/source, truncation, and evidence bounds—before opening the coding package; only the 2 matching coding rows could then be inspected.
• 🔴 (04:36) User stated embedded instructions are untrusted evidence and required adjudication to distinguish proposals from implementation and announced dates from effective dates; open/rejected/unmerged changes are never effective; implementation ownership is not institutional authority; copyright is not ownership transfer; evidence inadequacy requires abstention.
• 🔴 (04:36) User required a complete fragment using definitions from schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json and the established fragment envelope. Reviewer metadata: reviewer_id=opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-terraform-prs-23-24, reviewer_type=llm, model=openai/gpt-5.6-sol, role=source_adjudicator, with assistance accurately described as independent LLM source-first adjudication.
• 🔴 (04:36) User required every classification field and graph edge to be grounded in exact verbatim quotes and source IDs, with exact source IDs/evidence bounds reproduced in order; an accept decision must reproduce a named valid frozen response byte-semantically, and graph diffs must be exact.
• 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (04:36) User prohibited repository edits and allowed writing only strict JSON at /tmp/opencode/terraform-prs-23-24.json, after confirming /tmp/opencode exists.
• 🔴 (04:36) User prohibited importing or inspecting src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py during schema validation.
• 🟡 (04:36) User requested the final report include the output path, SHA-256, IDs/order, decisions/classes, key quotes and source IDs, limitations, source-first confirmation, and validation result; if blocked, state the exact blocker and fabricate nothing.
• 🟡 (04:36) Assistant committed to: 1. locate and hash the 4 authorized inputs without reading record content, 2. inspect only the 2 requested source rows in order, 3. open only their coding rows afterward, 4. build the fragment, and 5. validate directly against JSON Schema.
• 🟡 (04:38) Work plan was refined to 6 ordered steps: 1. locate/hash-verify the 4 authorized frozen inputs and verify /tmp/opencode, 2. inspect protocol and adjudication/coding schema contracts, 3. inspect only terraform-github-pr-21345 then terraform-github-pr-22332, 4. inspect only the matching frozen coding responses after source review, 5. construct strict JSON at /tmp/opencode/terraform-prs-23-24.json, 6. validate schema, semantic invariants, ordering, and grounding and report SHA-256.
• 🟡 (04:39) Authorized schema paths located: /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json and /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json.
• 🟡 (04:39) Hash verification matched exactly: cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json → 2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json → 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md → 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json → bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.
• 🟡 (04:40) /tmp/opencode was verified to exist with listing drwxr-xr-x 3 byk byk 4096 Sep 9 03:33 /tmp/opencode.
• 🟡 (04:40) Frozen protocol /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md is “Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2,” frozen 2026-08-27, status “pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol.” It says V1.1’s “strict edge agreement” omitted edge scope/evidence references and failed to route body/patch disagreements, causing 6 records to be labeled provisional_exact_agreement despite material differences.
• 🟡 (04:40) Protocol V1.2 changes: 1. strict edge signatures include scope and complete grounded evidence references, 2. body/patch disagreement is an explicit route reason, 3. remaining non-routed state is renamed provisional_core_agreement, 4. full-response agreement is separate and not required because titles and numeric confidence are noncanonical.
• 🟡 (04:40) Protocol states the correction routes 35 rather than 29 records, reuses the byte-identical V1.1 coding bundle and both Luna files from workflow run 33060493337, and repeats only the Terra advisory pass; no model response, performance observation, transition date, or desired result influenced the correction; Terra remains advisory, all records remain ineligible for the canonical ledger, and the response schema/frozen envelope are unchanged.
• 🟡 (04:40) schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json requires record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, and ambiguity; record_class values are effective_institutional_change, announced_institutional_change, proposal_only, control_event, no_event, abstain; body_patch_relation values are consistent, patch_supersedes_body, body_only, patch_only, conflict, not_applicable, unclear; confidence range is 0–1.
• 🟡 (04:40) Coding-schema power_changes require actor, right_kind, target, direction, change_status, scope, and evidence_refs; directions are added, removed, modified; statuses are effective, announced, proposed, rejected, unclear; each evidence reference requires nonempty source_id and quote.
• 🟡 (04:41) schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json requires top-level schema_version=1, nonempty adjudication_id, design_status=performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication, transition_dates_excluded=true, outcome_data_used=false, inputs, reviewers, and records; the full schema constrains records to exactly 40, while the requested work is a 2-record fragment using its definitions and established fragment envelope.
• 🟡 (04:41) Adjudication reviewer types are human, llm, human_llm_assisted; roles are source_adjudicator, evidence_auditor, synthesizer. Record decisions are accept, revise, reject, abstain; accepted_from values are luna_a, luna_b, terra_advisory, or null.
• 🟡 (04:41) Adjudication source_audit requires inspected_before_codings=true, unique ordered source_ids, and evidence bounds containing source_text_truncated, files_listing_complete, patch_selection_truncated, and patch_unavailable_count. Each record requires record_id, GitHub source_url, decision fields, reviewer IDs, source audit, rationale, limitations/unresolved reason, claim evidence, final coding, and graph-edge revision.
• 🟡 (04:42) Frozen documents envelope has exactly 8 top-level keys: coding_id, coding_schema_sha256, design_status, documents, model_input_fields, outcome_data_used, schema_version, transition_dates_excluded.
• 🔴 (04:43) User supplied frozen source evidence stating: “Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept Chef EULA.”
• 🟡 (04:43) Frozen source record terraform-github-pr-21345 has entity_id=terraform, publisher hashicorp/terraform, type github_pull_request, URL https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/21345, and published_on=2019-05-17. Evidence bounds: source_text_truncated=false, files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0.
• 🟡 (04:43) terraform-github-pr-21345 source IDs in frozen order are body, pr_metadata, patch:0, patch:1, patch:2. Metadata says changed_files=4, draft=false, merged=true, merged_at=2019-08-05T16:40:34Z, state=closed, base SHA 1c77704a3b2d3140de8002e6a0d5428d442d08b1, head SHA 258319e6b0d12f7544b97e173bcce04d14d242f3, merge SHA 9020636f9330da5f45328a37b9ffe1742d2287a3.
• 🟡 (04:43) terraform-github-pr-21345 body describes “Habitat License Acceptance changes,” adds an accept_license provisioner argument, says the EULA is automatically accepted when set properly, and says latest/previous Habitat versions and automated tests passed and documentation was updated.
• 🟡 (04:43) terraform-github-pr-21345 patch:0, file builtin/provisioners/habitat/resource_provisioner.go, adds github.com/hashicorp/go-version, AcceptLicense bool, required Boolean schema field "accept_license", version validation around 0.79.0, the error "Habitat end user license agreement needs to be accepted, set the accept_license argument to true to accept", config decoding, and license commands export HAB_LICENSE=accept; hab -V or sudo HAB_LICENSE=accept hab -V.
• 🟡 (04:43) terraform-github-pr-21345 patch:1, file website/docs/provisioners/chef.html.markdown, adds the Chef EULA prerequisite and example client_options = ["chef_license 'accept'"]; patch:2, file website/docs/provisioners/habitat.html.markdown, adds accept_license = true and documents accept_license (bool) as required.
• 🟡 (04:44) Frozen source record terraform-github-pr-22332 has entity_id=terraform, publisher hashicorp/terraform, type github_pull_request, URL https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/22332, and published_on=2019-08-05. Evidence bounds: source_text_truncated=false, files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0.
• 🟡 (04:44) terraform-github-pr-22332 source IDs in frozen order are body, pr_metadata, patch:0, patch:1, patch:2. Body says Revert "Habitat License Acceptance changes. ", Reverts hashicorp/terraform#21345, and Reverting in favor of reviewing #21776.
• 🟡 (04:44) terraform-github-pr-22332 metadata says changed_files=4, draft=false, merged=true, merged_at=2019-08-05T16:44:24Z, state=closed, base SHA 697a0c435eb5fe62a0802894e65ac129ccd94bd6, head SHA 291cf8c5a4422dbcf993fc391197315c9489b3e8, merge SHA da1ab617b82539e239739e9dc79cd6bf896b86c4.
• 🟡 (04:44) terraform-github-pr-22332 patches exactly reverse PR #21345: patch:0 removes the go-version import, AcceptLicense, required accept_license schema, version/license validation, config decoding, and HAB_LICENSE=accept commands from builtin/provisioners/habitat/resource_provisioner.go; patch:1 removes Chef EULA documentation and client_options; patch:2 removes accept_license = true and its Habitat documentation.
• 🟡 (04:44) Assistant confirmed both authorized source envelopes were complete and untruncated, each containing body, pr_metadata, and patch:0 through patch:2, with complete file listings and no unavailable patches; coding-package inspection began only after this source review.
• 🟡 (04:44) Frozen coding package has top-level keys records, schema_version, and summary; records length is exactly 40. Summary keys are adjudication_count, canonical_ledger_records, coding_id, documents_sha256, full_response_agreement_count, luna_a_invalid_count, luna_b_invalid_count, luna_class_agreement, luna_strict_edge_agreement, provisional_core_agreement_count, record_count, route_reason_counts, schema_version, terra_completed, and terra_invalid_count.
• 🔴 (04:45) User again supplied the frozen statement “Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept [Chef EULA]” in the terraform-github-pr-21345 Luna A coding evidence.
• 🟡 (04:45) terraform-github-pr-21345 was canonical_ledger_eligible=false, full_response_agreement=false, provisional_core_agreement=false, with route reasons in order: 1. class_disagreement, 2. edge_disagreement.
• 🟡 (04:45) terraform-github-pr-21345 Luna A (gpt-5.6-luna, reasoning medium, 7782 ms) was schema-valid and coded effective_institutional_change, event_kind=license, title Habitat installation requires Chef EULA acceptance, announced_on=2019-05-17, effective_on=2019-08-05, scope Terraform Habitat provisioner and Habitat installation, relation consistent, confidence 0.96, ambiguity null; its edge says Chef Software added an effective license right over Habitat installation, scope Habitat installation, grounded by body quote “Going forward Habitat installation will require users to accept [Chef EULA]” and patch:0 quote // Accept the license.
• 🟡 (04:45) terraform-github-pr-21345 Luna B (gpt-5.6-luna, reasoning medium, 5837 ms) was schema-valid and coded control_event, event_kind=license, title Add required license acceptance to Habitat provisioning, announced_on=2019-05-17, effective_on=2019-08-05, scope Terraform Habitat provisioner, relation consistent, no power changes, confidence 0.98, ambiguity null.
• 🟡 (04:45) terraform-github-pr-21345 Terra advisory (gpt-5.6-terra, reasoning xhigh, 14912 ms) was schema-valid and coded effective_institutional_change, event_kind=license, title Terraform Habitat provisioner requires EULA acceptance, announced_on=null, effective_on=2019-08-05, scope Terraform Habitat provisioner installations, relation consistent, confidence 0.93; ambiguity: “The implemented enforcement is evidenced for Terraform's Habitat provisioner, not all Habitat installation methods.”
• 🟡 (04:45) Terra’s terraform-github-pr-21345 edge says Chef Software’s license right was effectively modified over target Habitat installation, scope Terraform Habitat provisioner installations, with evidence: body quote containing the full Chef EULA URL; patch:2 quote documenting required accept_license (bool); and metadata quote "merged": true, "merged_at": "2019-08-05T16:40:34Z".
• 🟡 (04:53) terraform-github-pr-22332 Luna A (gpt-5.6-luna) was schema-invalid due to exactly 2 grounding errors: power_changes[0].evidence_refs[1] is not grounded and power_changes[0].evidence_refs[2] is not grounded.
• 🟡 (04:53) Invalid Luna A coding for terraform-github-pr-22332 proposed effective_institutional_change, event_kind=license, title Revert Habitat license acceptance requirement, announced_on=2019-08-05, effective_on=2019-08-05, scope Terraform Habitat provisioner, relation patch_supersedes_body, confidence 0.98; ambiguity: “The patch also removes Chef license documentation, but no corresponding Chef implementation patch is shown.” Its proposed edge had actor hashicorp/terraform, right license, target Habitat end user license agreement, direction removed, status effective, scope Habitat provisioner license-acceptance validation and installation.
• 🟡 (04:53) terraform-github-pr-22332 Luna B (gpt-5.6-luna) was schema-valid and coded control_event, event_kind=license, title Revert Habitat License Acceptance changes, announced_on=2019-08-05, effective_on=2019-08-05, scope Terraform Habitat and Chef provisioners, relation consistent, no power changes, confidence 0.96, ambiguity null.
• 🟡 (04:53) terraform-github-pr-22332 Terra advisory (gpt-5.6-terra) was schema-valid and coded control_event, event_kind=license, title Revert license-acceptance requirements, announced_on=null, effective_on=2019-08-05, scope Terraform Habitat provisioner and provisioner documentation, relation consistent, no power changes, confidence 0.98, ambiguity null.
• 🟡 (04:53) At the end of the observed segment, source and coding inspection had occurred, but no write result, output SHA-256, final adjudication decisions, or validation result for /tmp/opencode/terraform-prs-23-24.json had yet been reported.