Distillation

🔴 (23:13) User provided source evidence stating: “The TSC never posted on GitHub summary since February.”
🔴 (23:13) User provided the announced governance directive: “From now on, whomever takes notes during the TSC meeting will also open the PR posting the public notes,” assigning TSC note-takers an added public-note posting duty.
🟡 (23:12) schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json requires a complete adjudication object to contain exactly 40 records (minItems: 40, maxItems: 40), at least 1 reviewer, schema_version=1, design_status="performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication", transition_dates_excluded=true, and outcome_data_used=false.
🟡 (23:12) The adjudication schema’s inputs object requires positive integer workflow_run_id and artifact_id plus 64-character lowercase SHA-256 values for artifact_sha256, documents_sha256, documents_file_sha256, coding_package_file_sha256, protocol_sha256, coding_schema_sha256, and adjudication_schema_sha256.
🟡 (23:12) Existing OpenTofu adjudication fragments were enumerated as /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-pr-1650.json, /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-a1.json, and /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-a2.json.
🟡 (23:13) cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-pr-1650.json contains one source-first adjudication for opentofu-github-pr-1650 (https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1650) by reviewer opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-opentofu-a, model openai/gpt-5.6-sol, reviewer type llm, role source_adjudicator.
🟡 (23:13) The opentofu-github-pr-1650 source audit says body, pr_metadata, and patch:0 were inspected before codings; evidence bounds are files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, patch_unavailable_count=0, and source_text_truncated=false.
🟡 (23:13) The opentofu-github-pr-1650 adjudication decision is accept from terra_advisory. Final coding is announced_institutional_change, event kind board_or_steering, title TSC announced regular posting of meeting notes, announced_on="2024-05-15", effective_on=null, affected scope TSC meeting summaries, and body/patch relation consistent. (meaning May 15, 2024)
🟡 (23:13) The accepted power edge for opentofu-github-pr-1650 is actor TSC members who take notes → right kind inform → target public notes, direction added, status announced, scope TSC meetings. Its exact evidence is body quote “TSC members who take notes will now post these regularly” and patch:0 quote “From now on, whomever takes notes during the TSC meeting will also open the PR posting the public notes.”
🟡 (23:13) The opentofu-github-pr-1650 coding has confidence 0.75; its ambiguity states that the merged patch records an announced future note-posting practice but does not demonstrate implementation or compliance. graph_edge_revision uses baseline terra_advisory with no added or removed edges.
🟡 (23:13) The fragment’s rationale distinguishes announcement from effectiveness: the body and merged meeting-summary patch consistently announce a recurring public-note practice, but no later compliance evidence supports an effective date. Its evidence limitation says the frozen envelope covers the sole changed file with no unavailable or truncated patch, yet contains no later meeting record showing the practice was followed.
🟡 (23:13) Potential provenance inconsistency in opentofu-pr-1650.json: the announced_on claim cites source_id="record_metadata" with quote "published_on":"2024-05-15", while source_audit.source_ids lists only body, pr_metadata, and patch:0; this requires validation against the frozen source-ID contract.

Distillation

Observations