Distillation

🔴 (16:16) User stated the prior review result was empty and could not satisfy the security merge gate. 🔴 (16:16) User stated the repository remains unchanged with base commit bd065083c3b82677747b97a6cc7f5cf57532d3bc, head commit fc5d50e2324e2b6bb2067976bf1515dab45224fb, triple-dot patch SHA-256 03c5772e78b393b3979c44754709d7f401bb37a71e5679b34c50a9cc8334c2d0, and a clean worktree. 🔴 (16:16) User directive/preference: Never return empty output. 🔴 [requested-review] (16:16) User requested resumption of the same read-only, substantive, evidence-based security review, covering every changed file and all relevant security boundaries from the original prompt. 🔴 [requested-verification] (16:16) User required re-verification before and after review of base bd065083c3b82677747b97a6cc7f5cf57532d3bc, head fc5d50e2324e2b6bb2067976bf1515dab45224fb, triple-dot patch SHA-256 03c5772e78b393b3979c44754709d7f401bb37a71e5679b34c50a9cc8334c2d0, and clean-worktree status. 🔴 [enforced-read-only] (16:16) User prohibited any repository modifications during the review. 🔴 (16:16) User required the report to return exactly one substantive outcome type: (1) findings classified PASS/FAIL/CONCERN/MUST-FIX, each with exact file:line evidence, attack path, fix, and deterministic regression; (2) explicit PASS statements with exact file:line evidence and residual risks when no defects are found; or (3) BLOCKED with the exact tool/error preventing review. 🔴 (16:16) User required the final review output to end exactly MERGE or DO-NOT-MERGE.