Distillation

Date: Sep 2, 2026

• 🔴 [requested-read-only-review] (13:18) User requested a strict read-only final adversarial review of current uncommitted compact workspace publish-contract changes in both worktrees: /home/byk/Code/getsentry/craft-workspace-action-propagation and /home/byk/Code/getsentry/publish-workspace-acceptance; instructed not to modify files.
• 🔴 (13:18) User required inspection of complete diffs plus relevant current source, tests, and workflows in both specified worktrees.
• 🔴 (13:18) User specified review validation: legacy and compact title handling, including an optional getsentry prefix and JSON legacy workspace paths.
• 🔴 (13:18) User specified CI-poller validation: it uses the generated parser; fails closed on exactly one canonical Quick links → View check runs entry; rejects same-repository decoys and duplicate links; and includes a controller-source checkout.
• 🔴 (13:18) User specified exact CI-revision-flow validation through checkout, discovery, resolved location, state, and craft publish --rev.
• 🔴 (13:18) User specified validation that . and .. workspace names are consistently rejected in Craft schema/action and Publish discovery.
• 🔴 (13:18) User specified validation that state-parity tests exercise a feasible resolved compact location.
• 🔴 (13:18) User specified validation of generated-parser drift test, YAML/expression validity, action ordering, absence of repository-local state, and commit hygiene.
• 🔴 (13:18) User required confirmation that untracked pnpm-lock.yaml is absent or excluded, and identification of any unrelated changes.
• 🔴 (13:18) User required the review response format to contain only prioritized file:line findings marked PASS/FAIL, ending with MERGE or DO-NOT-MERGE; no generic summary.