Session 0l8Tmufc91Ao

[
  {
    "content": "Verify SHA-256 values and inspect governing protocol, schema, validator, and authorized output example",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Extract and audit every frozen primary-source component and evidence bound for the three records in order",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Open and adjudicate only the direct Luna/Terra response objects after source audit completion",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Build and validate the complete adjudication fragment without changing files",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce  cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json
14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769  cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2
2: 
3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27  
4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol
5: 
6: ## Correction
7: 
8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders.
9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict
10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted
11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the
12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called
13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences.
14: 
15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph
16: construction:
17: 
18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": [
8:     "schema_version",
9:     "adjudication_id",
10:     "design_status",
11:     "transition_dates_excluded",
12:     "outcome_data_used",
13:     "inputs",
14:     "reviewers",
15:     "records"
16:   ],
17:   "properties": {
18:     "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19:     "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20:     "design_status": {
21:       "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22:     },
23:     "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24:     "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25:     ...

Found 1 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 539: def validate_adjudication_fragment(

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: from __future__ import annotations
2: 
3: import argparse
4: import hashlib
5: import json
6: import zipfile
7: from collections import Counter
8: from pathlib import Path
9: from typing import Any
10: 
11: from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator, FormatChecker
12: 
13: from institution_lab.governance_coding import validate_response
14: 
15: DECISIONS = {"accept", "revise", "reject", "abstain"}
16: INSTITUTIONAL_CLASSES = {
17: 	"effective_institutional_change",
18: 	"announced_institutional_change",
19: 	"proposal_only",
20: }
21: REVIEWER_TYPES = {"human", "llm", "human_llm_assisted"}
22: REVIEWER_ROLES = {"source_adjudicator", "evidence_auditor", "synthesizer"}
23: RESPONSE_SOURCES = {"luna_a", "luna_b", "terra_advisory"}
24: REQUIRED_INPUT_PINS = {
25: 	"workflow_run_id",
26: 	"artifact_id",
27: 	"artifact_sha256",
28: 	"documents_sha256",
29: ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/fragments/opentofu-a2.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "schema_version": 1,
3:   "design_status": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication",
4:   "reviewers": [
5:     {
6:       "reviewer_id": "opencode-sol-opentofu-a2",
7:       "reviewer_type": "llm",
8:       "model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
9:       "role": "source_adjudicator",
10:       "assistance": "Source-first review of four frozen OpenTofu records"
11:     }
12:   ],
13:   "records": [
14:     {
15:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-340",
16:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340",
17:       "decision": "accept",
18:       "accepted_from": "luna_b",
19:       "reviewer_ids": [
20:         "opencode-sol-opentofu-a2"
21:       ],
22:       "source_audit": {
23:         "inspected_before_codings": true,
24:         "source_ids": [
25:           "body"
26:         ...

Found 16 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py:
  Line 70:     "record_class",

  Line 77:     "power_changes",

  Line 241: def validate_response(response: dict[str, Any], document: dict[str, Any]) -> list[str]:

  Line 245:     record_class = response.get("record_class")

  Line 246:     if record_class not in RECORD_CLASSES:

  Line 247:         errors.append("record_class is not allowed")

  Line 273:     changes = response.get("power_changes")

  Line 275:         errors.append("power_changes must be an array")

  Line 278:         prefix = f"power_changes[{index}]"

  Line 304:     institutional = record_class in {

  Line 310:         errors.append("institutional/proposal records require power_changes")

  Line 312:         errors.append("non-institutional records must not contain power_changes")

  Line 313:     if record_class == "abstain" and response.get("ambiguity") is None:

  Line 381:     for edge in ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: """Prepare and validate performance-blinded coding of enriched governance records."""
2: 
3: from __future__ import annotations
4: 
5: import argparse
6: import hashlib
7: import json
8: import math
9: from collections import Counter
10: from datetime import date
11: from pathlib import Path
12: from typing import Any
13: 
14: RECORD_CLASSES = {
15:     "effective_institutional_change",
16:     "announced_institutional_change",
17:     "proposal_only",
18:     "control_event",
19:     "no_event",
20:     "abstain",
21: }
22: EVENT_KINDS = {
23:     "leadership",
24:     "board_or_steering",
25:     "control_rights",
26:     "reorganization",
27:     "foundation_transfer",
28:     "license",
29:     "fork",
30:     "reunification",
31:     "strategy",
32:     "product",
33:     "external",
34: }
35: RIGHT_KINDS = {
36:     "appoint",
37:     "remove",
38:     ...

[
  {
    "frozen_index": 30,
    "record_id": "valkey-github-issue-2961",
    "entity_id": "valkey",
    "publisher": "valkey-io/valkey",
    "published_on": "2025-12-22",
    "source_url": "https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/2961",
    "source_type": "github_issue",
    "evidence_bounds": {
      "files_listing_complete": null,
      "patch_selection_truncated": false,
      "patch_unavailable_count": 0,
      "source_text_truncated": false
    },
    "source_components": [
      {
        "source_id": "body",
        "kind": "github_body",
        "filename": null,
        "text_bytes": 2124,
        "text_lines": 39
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "frozen_index": 31,
    "record_id": "valkey-github-issue-3289",
    "entity_id": "valkey",
    "publisher": "valkey-io/valkey",
    "published_on": "2026-03-02",
    "source_url": "https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/3289",
    "source_type": "github_issue",
    "evidence_bounds": {
      "files_listing_complete": null,
      ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
---TEXT---
[NEW] Valkey kernel-level hot key detection function

**The problem/use-case that the feature addresses**

In Valkey, hot keys (high-frequency access keys) severely impact system stability: single hot key over-access overloads its node (high CPU, increased latency), becomes a server bottleneck even triggering cascading failures, and may cause cache penetration hitting backend databases in extreme cases. However, currently Valkey does not provide a hot key discovery mechanism, and we hope to complement this capability.

**Description of the feature**

We hope to build a Valkey kernel-level hot key detection and processing solution for real-time accurate identification and efficient governance, including three core parts:

1. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
---TEXT---
[NEW]  Valkey Improvement Proposals (VIP)

**The problem/use-case that the feature addresses**

As Valkey continues to grow, the project lacks a formal, structured process for proposing, discussing, and approving major changes to its Core, Modules, Clients, and Tooling. The current RFC process needs refinement to ensure that significant changes such as new features, subsystems, or modifications to public interfaces (network protocol and API behavior, AOF/RDB format, error/authentication log format) are thoroughly vetted by the community before implementation. Without a standardized improvement proposal process, there is a risk of fragmented discussions, unclear decision-making criteria, and insufficient community input on changes that impact Valkey's stability and compatibility commitments. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
---TEXT---
[NEW] AI Skills for the Valkey Ecosystem

**The problem/use-case that the feature addresses**

AI coding assistants now generate a significant portion of production code. These tools train on internet snapshots - newer features have less coverage. For Valkey:

- **Valkey 9.x commands are not in training data.** Models answer `SLOWLOG` instead of `COMMANDLOG`, miss `SET IFEQ`, `HSETEX`/`HGETEX`, `DELIFEQ`, `CLUSTERSCAN` - defaulting to Redis 7.x patterns.
- **GLIDE APIs differ from every Redis client.** Different signatures, argument orders, async patterns. Code from Redis knowledge does not compile with GLIDE.
- **Operational defaults are invisible.** Renamed config directives, lazyfree defaults, io-threads tuning, Helm values - operators migrating from Redis get wrong answers.
- **Large codebases need guided navigation.** ~200 C source files. ...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify SHA-256 values and inspect governing protocol, schema, validator, and authorized output example",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Extract and audit every frozen primary-source component and evidence bound for the three records in order",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Open and adjudicate only the direct Luna/Terra response objects after source audit completion",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Build and validate the complete adjudication fragment without changing files",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

[
  {
    "record_id": "valkey-github-issue-2961",
    "luna_a": {
      "schema_valid": true,
      "response": {
        "affected_scope": "Valkey hot key detection and processing",
        "ambiguity": null,
        "announced_on": "2025-12-22",
        "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
        "confidence": 0.98,
        "effective_on": null,
        "event_kind": "product",
        "power_changes": [],
        "record_class": "control_event",
        "title": "Proposal for Valkey kernel-level hot key detection"
      }
    },
    "luna_b": {
      "schema_valid": true,
      "response": {
        "affected_scope": "Valkey hot key detection, processing, and monitoring",
        "ambiguity": null,
        "announced_on": "2025-12-22",
        "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
        "confidence": 0.98,
        "effective_on": null,
        "event_kind": "product",
        "power_changes": [],
        "record_class": "control_event",
        "title": "Proposal for ...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify SHA-256 values and inspect governing protocol, schema, validator, and authorized output example",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Extract and audit every frozen primary-source component and evidence bound for the three records in order",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Open and adjudicate only the direct Luna/Terra response objects after source audit completion",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Build and validate the complete adjudication fragment without changing files",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

/usr/bin/bash: line 1: python: command not found

/usr/bin/python3

{
  "validation_errors": [
    "record valkey-github-issue-3289.claim_evidence_refs[4].quote is not grounded in source body"
  ],
  "fragment": {
    "schema_version": 1,
    "design_status": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication",
    "reviewers": [
      {
        "reviewer_id": "opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1",
        "reviewer_type": "llm",
        "model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
        "role": "source_adjudicator",
        "assistance": "Source-first review of three frozen Valkey issue records"
      }
    ],
    "records": [
      {
        "record_id": "valkey-github-issue-2961",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/2961",
        "decision": "accept",
        "accepted_from": "terra_advisory",
        "reviewer_ids": [
          "opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1"
        ],
        "source_audit": {
          "inspected_before_codings": true,
          "source_ids": [
            "body"
          ],
          "evidence_bounds": {
      ...

{
  "validation_errors": [],
  "fragment": {
    "schema_version": 1,
    "design_status": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication",
    "reviewers": [
      {
        "reviewer_id": "opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1",
        "reviewer_type": "llm",
        "model": "openai/gpt-5.6-sol",
        "role": "source_adjudicator",
        "assistance": "Source-first review of three frozen Valkey issue records"
      }
    ],
    "records": [
      {
        "record_id": "valkey-github-issue-2961",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/2961",
        "decision": "revise",
        "accepted_from": null,
        "reviewer_ids": [
          "opencode-sol-valkey-issues-a1"
        ],
        "source_audit": {
          "inspected_before_codings": true,
          "source_ids": [
            "body"
          ],
          "evidence_bounds": {
            "files_listing_complete": null,
            "patch_selection_truncated": false,
            ...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify SHA-256 values and inspect governing protocol, schema, validator, and authorized output example",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Extract and audit every frozen primary-source component and evidence bound for the three records in order",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Open and adjudicate only the direct Luna/Terra response objects after source audit completion",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Build and validate the complete adjudication fragment without changing files",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]