Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Session 1OngeyDLwNEL
1OngeyDLwNEL8gtboFresh source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record: terraform-github-pr-34103. This replaces a blocked reviewer; do not use memory, prior reviewer output, or any existing fragment. Repository: /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab. Research only; never edit repository files. Write only /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34103-clean-v2.json after verifying /tmp/opencode exists. Never inspect another record.
The output fragment contract is given here so you never need to inspect other fragments: top-level object has exactly four properties, schema_version, design_status, reviewers, records; schema_version is 1; design_status is performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication; reviewers contains your one reviewer; records contains your one record. Use $defs.reviewer and $defs.record from schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json. Do not open repository fragment files or recall unrelated-record context.
Strict performance isolation:
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; coding package file 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; protocol 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; coding schema bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.record_id and, for each model response, response_name, response payload fields record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, ambiguity. ...I’ll first locate the four frozen inputs by filename, verify their hashes and /tmp/opencode, then extract only the authorized source envelope. I will keep the repository read-only and stop without writing if any hash fails or any prohibited coding field is exposed.
[
{
"content": "Locate authorized frozen inputs and verify exact hashes plus /tmp/opencode",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract and inspect only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record source-only provisional interpretation before coding access",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only permitted fields from this record's model responses",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate against protocol and schemas, then write the one output fragment",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate strict JSON, $defs, grounding, identity, and output hash",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Confirm repository remained unchanged and report evidence",
"status": "pending",
"priority": ...
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/sol-reasoning-hard-case-protocol.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/llm-event-triage-cost-frontier-protocol.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json
drwxr-xr-x 6 byk byk 4096 Sep 9 05:26 /tmp/opencode
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769 cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json 291753ecc56e7d1cce226b86b830aa95a8a34c732360ac42395afc3145902552 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md d072f535502d6cbdad0308418091826f5b8e687587f95cc27c1e1aa70dd9d1f4 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json
true
{
"entity_id": "terraform",
"evidence_bounds": {
"files_listing_complete": true,
"patch_selection_truncated": false,
"patch_unavailable_count": 0,
"source_text_truncated": false
},
"published_on": "2023-10-17",
"publisher": "hashicorp/terraform",
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34103",
"source_type": "github_pull_request",
"source_url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/34103",
"sources": [
{
"filename": null,
"kind": "github_body",
"source_id": "body",
"text": "Backport of update hcl v2.19.0 into v1.6\n\n\n## Backport\n\nThis PR is auto-generated from #34096 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.6-backport.\n\n\n\nThe below text is copied from the body of the original PR.\n\n---\n\nHCL v2.19.0 \r\nEnhancements\r\n- ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each ...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path> <type>file</type> <content> 1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2 2: 3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27 4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol 5: 6: ## Correction 7: 8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders. 9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict 10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted 11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the 12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called 13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences. 14: 15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph 16: construction: 17: 18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2: "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3: "$id": "https://github.com/BYK/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json",
4: "title": "Performance-blinded governance coding v1",
5: "type": "object",
6: "additionalProperties": false,
7: "required": ["record_class", "event_kind", "title", "announced_on", "effective_on", "affected_scope", "body_patch_relation", "power_changes", "confidence", "ambiguity"],
8: "properties": {
9: "record_class": {"enum": ["effective_institutional_change", "announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only", "control_event", "no_event", "abstain"]},
10: "event_kind": {"type": ["string", "null"], "enum": ["leadership", "board_or_steering", "control_rights", "reorganization", "foundation_transfer", "license", "fork", "reunification", "strategy", "product", "external", ...
[
{
"content": "Locate authorized frozen inputs and verify exact hashes plus /tmp/opencode",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract and inspect only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record source-only provisional interpretation before coding access",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only permitted fields from this record's model responses",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate against protocol and schemas, then write the one output fragment",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate strict JSON, $defs, grounding, identity, and output hash",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Confirm repository remained unchanged and report evidence",
"status": "pending",
"priority": ...
Source-only provisional interpretation, fixed before coding access: no_event, event_kind: null, no announcement or effective institutional date, and no power changes. The body describes a dependency backport, “Backport of update hcl v2.19.0 into v1.6,” followed only by an enhancement and bug fixes; pr_metadata proves the PR merged but supplies no evidence of changed institutional authority. The envelope contains body and metadata only, so the provisional body/patch relation is body_only; the key limitation is that no patch source is present even though the bounds say selection was not truncated and no patch was unavailable.
[
{
"content": "Locate authorized frozen inputs and verify exact hashes plus /tmp/opencode",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract and inspect only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record source-only provisional interpretation before coding access",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only permitted fields from this record's model responses",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate against protocol and schemas, then write the one output fragment",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate strict JSON, $defs, grounding, identity, and output hash",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Confirm repository remained unchanged and report evidence",
"status": "pending",
"priority": ...
jq: error (at cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:4085): no projected responses found
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34103",
"responses": [
{
"response_name": null,
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"response_name": null,
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": null,
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"response_name": null,
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": ...
Found 6 matches /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py: Line 51: "coding_package": tmp_path / "coding-package.json", Line 689: coding_package = tmp_path / "coding-package.json" Line 735: coding_package = tmp_path / "coding-package.json" Line 970: coding_package=input_directory / "v1.2-coding-package.json", Line 983: coding_package = json.loads((input_directory / "v1.2-coding-package.json").read_text()) Line 994: coding_package = json.loads((input_directory / "v1.2-coding-package.json").read_text())
(no output)
jq: error (at cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:4085): projected response count is not exactly three
jq: error (at cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:4085): projected response count is not exactly three
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34103",
"responses": [
{
"response_name": null,
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"response_name": null,
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": null,
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"response_name": null,
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": ...
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34103",
"responses": [
{
"response_name": "luna_a",
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"response_name": "luna_b",
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": null,
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"response_name": "terra_advisory",
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
...
The clean projection exposed exactly three named payloads and no prohibited fields: luna_a, luna_b, and terra_advisory. All three classify the record as a product control_event with no power changes; they disagree only on effective date and body/patch relation, so I’ll resolve those points from the frozen envelope and then validate the selected decision against the requested schema definitions.
[
{
"content": "Locate authorized frozen inputs and verify exact hashes plus /tmp/opencode",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract and inspect only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record source-only provisional interpretation before coding access",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only permitted fields from this record's model responses",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate against protocol and schemas, then write the one output fragment",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate strict JSON, $defs, grounding, identity, and output hash",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Confirm repository remained unchanged and report evidence",
"status": "pending",
...
{
"reviewer": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"reviewer_id",
"reviewer_type",
"model",
"role",
"assistance"
],
"properties": {
"reviewer_id": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"reviewer_type": {
"enum": [
"human",
"llm",
"human_llm_assisted"
]
},
"model": {
"type": [
"string",
"null"
],
"minLength": 1
},
"role": {
"enum": [
"source_adjudicator",
"evidence_auditor",
"synthesizer"
]
},
"assistance": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
}
}
},
"record": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"record_id",
"source_url",
"decision",
"accepted_from",
"reviewer_ids",
"source_audit",
"rationale",
...
{
"source_audit": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"inspected_before_codings",
"source_ids",
"evidence_bounds"
],
"properties": {
"inspected_before_codings": {
"const": true
},
"source_ids": {
"type": "array",
"minItems": 1,
"uniqueItems": true,
"items": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
}
},
"evidence_bounds": {
"$ref": "#/$defs/evidence_bounds"
}
}
},
"claim_evidence_ref": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"field",
"source_id",
"quote"
],
"properties": {
"field": {
"enum": [
"record_class",
"event_kind",
"title",
"announced_on",
"effective_on",
"affected_scope",
"body_patch_relation"
]
},
"source_id": {
"type": ...
{
"evidence_bounds": {
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"required": [
"source_text_truncated",
"files_listing_complete",
"patch_selection_truncated",
"patch_unavailable_count"
],
"properties": {
"source_text_truncated": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"files_listing_complete": {
"type": [
"boolean",
"null"
]
},
"patch_selection_truncated": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"patch_unavailable_count": {
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 0
}
}
}
}
/usr/bin/python3 4.10.3 <string>:1: DeprecationWarning: Accessing jsonschema.__version__ is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use importlib.metadata directly to query for jsonschema's version.
terra_advisory coding schema valid
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab</path> <type>directory</type> <entries> .git/ .github/ .gitignore .lore.md .pytest_cache/ .ruff_cache/ .venv/ AGENTS.md cases/ data/ docs/ node_modules/ package-lock.json package.json PROTOCOL.md pyproject.toml README.md research/ schema/ scripts/ src/ tests/ uv.lock (23 entries) </entries>
The source supports accepting terra_advisory exactly. Its body_only relation matches the supplied two-source envelope, its merged date matches pr_metadata, and its empty power-change set preserves the boundary between a merged product backport and institutional authority; I’ll now write the single fragment with an empty exact edge diff against that response.
(no output)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 60, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jsonschema/validators.py", line 287, in validate
raise error
jsonschema.exceptions.ValidationError: 'adjudication_id' is a required property
Failed validating 'required' in schema:
{'$defs': {'claim_evidence_ref': {'additionalProperties': False,
'properties': {'field': {'enum': ['record_class',
'event_kind',
'title',
'announced_on',
'effective_on',
'affected_scope',
'body_patch_relation']},
...
The full canonical schema correctly rejected the one-record fragment because that schema requires canonical-envelope fields and 40 records. The user-supplied fragment contract instead requires exactly four top-level keys and validation of the contained objects against $defs.reviewer and $defs.record; I am applying that fragment-specific validation now, without changing the fragment.
strict JSON valid; four-key fragment contract valid; $defs.reviewer valid; $defs.record valid; terra_advisory identity exact; quotes grounded; graph diff exact; frozen hashes verified
[
{
"content": "Locate authorized frozen inputs and verify exact hashes plus /tmp/opencode",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract and inspect only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record source-only provisional interpretation before coding access",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only permitted fields from this record's model responses",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate against protocol and schemas, then write the one output fragment",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate strict JSON, $defs, grounding, identity, and output hash",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Confirm repository remained unchanged and report evidence",
"status": "pending",
...
fb1fbde64527ea72c38d189ab2f15a4abaa2288dc5fefb05b3828ac975edfa96 /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34103-clean-v2.json
?? cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json ?? cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json ?? schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json
[
{
"content": "Locate authorized frozen inputs and verify exact hashes plus /tmp/opencode",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract and inspect only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record source-only provisional interpretation before coding access",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only permitted fields from this record's model responses",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate against protocol and schemas, then write the one output fragment",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate strict JSON, $defs, grounding, identity, and output hash",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Confirm repository remained unchanged and report evidence",
"status": "completed",
...
Result
/tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34103-clean-v2.jsonfb1fbde64527ea72c38d189ab2f15a4abaa2288dc5fefb05b3828ac975edfa96accept from terra_advisorycontrol_event / productbasis: terra_advisory, added: [], removed: []Grounding
body: “Backport of update hcl v2.19.0 into v1.6”body: “HCL v2.19.0”body: “The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.”pr_metadata: "merged": true, "merged_at": "2023-10-17T14:19:12Z"The record documents a merged technical product backport, never a change in institutional authority.
Limitations
No implementing patch source was supplied, despite files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, and patch_unavailable_count=0. The two changed files could not be checked directly.
Isolation
terraform-github-pr-34103.record_id; then response_name, record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, and ambiguity./tmp/opencode output was written; no repository file was edited.Validation
Strict JSON, the exact four-key fragment contract, $defs.reviewer, $defs.record, coding schema and date formats, quote grounding, exact terra_advisory payload identity, and exact graph diff all passed.
Date: Sep 9, 2026 * 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (05:25) User requested a fresh, source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record, `terraform-github-pr-34103`, replacing a blocked reviewer. User prohibited using memory, prior reviewer output, existing fragments, or unrelated-record context. * 🔴 (05:25) User specified repository `/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab` and stated the work is…