Session 1RRglnFszWUh

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents.json SHA-256 and inspect each assigned record's full metadata and ordered source envelope",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify v1.2-coding-package.json SHA-256 and inspect only ontology plus direct frozen responses for assigned records",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate all four records with exact evidence and graph-edge revisions",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate IDs, dates, ontology completeness, quote grounding, and final record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce  /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json

Found 4 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json:
  Line 16:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",

  Line 38:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2109",

  Line 60:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2573",

  Line 82:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-258",

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "coding_id": "oss-governance-enriched-coding-v1",
3:   "coding_schema_sha256": "bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e",
4:   "design_status": "performance_blinded_model_informed_development",
5:   "documents": [
6:     {
7:       "entity_id": "opentofu",
8:       "evidence_bounds": {
9:         "files_listing_complete": null,
10:         "patch_selection_truncated": false,
11:         "patch_unavailable_count": 0,
12:         "source_text_truncated": false
13:       },
14:       "published_on": "2024-03-08",
15:       "publisher": "opentofu/opentofu",
16:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
17:       "source_type": "github_issue",
18:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1353",
19:       "sources": [
20:         {
21:           "filename": null,
22:           "kind": ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_BEGIN
Creating a style guide/framework for documentation and user interface

### Summary

Having a consistent written style across multiple authors can help a large project maintain a uniform voice. A written-down style guide, along with linters (and other automation) and human reviews can help take the guess-work out of what that voice should be, and how to maintain it.

### Problem Statement

The written word is how we communicate with our customers. In places where communication is more formal (e.g., the official website, the `tofu` tool itself), having a consistent voice across multiple writers helps lend subconscious legitimacy to the project. There are many people for whom a misspelled word, or poor grammar, can reduce their trust in the thing being presented.

There is also the issue of _clarity_. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_BEGIN
Add an ability to install providers directly from GitHub

### The problem in your OpenTofu project

The current provider registry model, inherited from Terraform and designed by HashiCorp, centralizes control over provider distribution. While this model was effective initially, the registry has now become a potential point of restriction for some users due to political, security, and accessibility concerns. 

This dependency limits certain users from accessing or using providers freely, as they may not be able to—or may not wish to—access the official registry due to restrictions, governance, or compliance issues.

### Proposal

Make OpenTofu decentralized.

Introduce functionality to install providers directly from GitHub repositories, bypassing the centralized registry. This would enable users to specify a GitHub repository as a provider source, allowing for more flexible and decentralized provider management. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_BEGIN
Use correct year in Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary

Minor issue, but it looks like the TSC summaries since the beginning of 2025 are still dated in 2024 for [example](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/blame/7bb5da582c3930574ede1c3054a372d7c52e5b77/TSC_SUMMARY.md#L11)
TEXT_END

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_BEGIN
Replace Official Registry

Due to the Public Terraform Registry ToC change, OpenTF will not use it as the default registry.

However, we still want OpenTF to be a drop-in replacement, so all references to providers and modules should work as-is. This is esp. important because people can use modules which themselves reference other modules, and those indirect references are hard to change.

This means we need to replace the official registry in OpenTF.

It's worth noting that the registry is mostly a redirector to GitHub, and is heavily coupled with GitHub concepts like Releases. Only HashiCorp provider binaries (not modules) are hosted directly from the registry.

# UPDATE 2023-10-12

Alright, now that we have the alpha release behind us and a working alpha registry, it's time to start the discussion around the stable registry design! ...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents.json SHA-256 and inspect each assigned record's full metadata and ordered source envelope",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify v1.2-coding-package.json SHA-256 and inspect only ontology plus direct frozen responses for assigned records",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate all four records with exact evidence and graph-edge revisions",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate IDs, dates, ontology completeness, quote grounding, and final record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769  /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json

[
  "records",
  "schema_version",
  "summary"
]

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "records_type": "array",
  "records_length": 40,
  "record_keys": [
    "canonical_ledger_eligible",
    "full_response_agreement",
    "luna_a",
    "luna_b",
    "provisional_core_agreement",
    "record_id",
    "route_reasons",
    "source_url",
    "terra_advisory"
  ]
}

[
  {
    "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
    "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1353",
    "luna_a_type": "object",
    "luna_a_keys": [
      "elapsed_ms",
      "model",
      "reasoning_effort",
      "response",
      "schema_valid",
      "validation_errors"
    ],
    "luna_b_type": "object",
    "luna_b_keys": [
      "elapsed_ms",
      "model",
      "reasoning_effort",
      "response",
      "schema_valid",
      "validation_errors"
    ],
    "terra_advisory_type": "object",
    "terra_advisory_keys": [
      "elapsed_ms",
      "model",
      "reasoning_effort",
      "response",
      "schema_valid",
      "validation_errors"
    ]
  },
  {
    "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2109",
    "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/2109",
    "luna_a_type": "object",
    "luna_a_keys": [
      "elapsed_ms",
      "model",
      "reasoning_effort",
      "response",
      "schema_valid",
      "validation_errors"
    ...

[
  {
    "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
    "luna_a_response_type": "object",
    "luna_b_response_type": "object",
    "terra_advisory_response_type": "object"
  },
  {
    "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2109",
    "luna_a_response_type": "object",
    "luna_b_response_type": "object",
    "terra_advisory_response_type": "object"
  },
  {
    "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2573",
    "luna_a_response_type": "object",
    "luna_b_response_type": "object",
    "terra_advisory_response_type": null
  },
  {
    "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-258",
    "luna_a_response_type": "object",
    "luna_b_response_type": "object",
    "terra_advisory_response_type": "object"
  }
]

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1353",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu technical documentation and user interface writing",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2024-03-08",
    "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
    "confidence": 0.97,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "control_rights",
    "power_changes": [
      {
        "actor": "OpenTofu",
        "change_status": "proposed",
        "direction": "added",
        "evidence_refs": [
          {
            "quote": "I'm proposing a _framework_ for technical documentation and user interface writing.",
            "source_id": "body"
          },
          {
            "quote": "getting all authors to set aside their pet styles and use the standard style for OpenTofu.",
            "source_id": "body"
          }
        ],
        "right_kind": "set_policy",
        "scope": "OpenTofu project",
        "target": "technical ...

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2109",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/2109",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu provider installation and distribution",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2024-10-28",
    "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
    "confidence": 0.98,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "control_rights",
    "power_changes": [
      {
        "actor": "users",
        "change_status": "proposed",
        "direction": "added",
        "evidence_refs": [
          {
            "quote": "This would enable users to specify a GitHub repository as a provider source, allowing for more flexible and decentralized provider management.",
            "source_id": "body"
          }
        ],
        "right_kind": "override",
        "scope": "provider installation and access",
        "target": "centralized registry"
      }
    ],
    "record_class": "proposal_only",
    "title": "Proposal for direct GitHub provider ...

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2573",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/2573",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": null,
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": null,
    "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
    "confidence": 0.99,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": null,
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "no_event",
    "title": "Correct year in TSC summaries"
  },
  "luna_b": {
    "affected_scope": null,
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": null,
    "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
    "confidence": 0.99,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": null,
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "no_event",
    "title": "Use correct year in Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary"
  },
  "terra_advisory": null
}

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-258",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/258",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu registry design",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2023-11-03",
    "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
    "confidence": 0.98,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "Homebrew-like registry design chosen for implementation"
  },
  "luna_b": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu registry design",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2023-11-03",
    "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
    "confidence": 0.96,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "Homebrew-like registry design chosen for implementation"
  },
  "terra_advisory": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu stable registry design",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": ...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents.json SHA-256 and inspect each assigned record's full metadata and ordered source envelope",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify v1.2-coding-package.json SHA-256 and inspect only ontology plus direct frozen responses for assigned records",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate all four records with exact evidence and graph-edge revisions",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate IDs, dates, ontology completeness, quote grounding, and final record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/artifact-9642983578.zip
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents.json SHA-256 and inspect each assigned record's full metadata and ordered source envelope",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify v1.2-coding-package.json SHA-256 and inspect only ontology plus direct frozen assigned-record responses",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate all four records with exact evidence and graph-edge revisions",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate IDs, dates, ontology completeness, quote grounding, and final record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

Found 9 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 185: 				"claim_evidence_refs": [],

  Line 375: 	record["claim_evidence_refs"] = [

  Line 400: 		"claim_evidence_refs": [

  Line 460: 		"claim_evidence_refs": [


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 354: 	claim_refs = record.get("claim_evidence_refs")

  Line 356: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: claim_evidence_refs must be an array")

  Line 359: 		path = f"{prefix}.claim_evidence_refs[{ref_index}]"


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json:
  Line 236:         "claim_evidence_refs", "final_coding", "graph_edge_revision"

  Line 257:         "claim_evidence_refs": {

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": [
8:     "schema_version",
9:     "adjudication_id",
10:     "design_status",
11:     "transition_dates_excluded",
12:     "outcome_data_used",
13:     "inputs",
14:     "reviewers",
15:     "records"
16:   ],
17:   "properties": {
18:     "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19:     "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20:     "design_status": {
21:       "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22:     },
23:     "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24:     "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25:     ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
270: 		or evidence_bounds.get("patch_selection_truncated") is True
271: 		or (
272: 			isinstance(evidence_bounds.get("patch_unavailable_count"), int)
273: 			and evidence_bounds["patch_unavailable_count"] > 0
274: 		)
275: 	)
276: 	if bounded_evidence and (
277: 		not isinstance(record.get("evidence_limitations"), str)
278: 		or not record["evidence_limitations"]
279: 	):
280: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: bounded evidence requires evidence_limitations")
281: 
282: 	accepted_from = record.get("accepted_from")
283: 	final_coding = record.get("final_coding")
284: 	if decision == "accept":
285: 		if accepted_from not in RESPONSE_SOURCES:
286: 			errors.append(f"{prefix}: accept requires accepted_from")
287: 		else:
288: 			accepted = _response_for(coding_record, accepted_from)
289: 			if accepted is None:
290: 				errors.append(f"{prefix}: {accepted_from} is ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "coding_id": "oss-governance-enriched-coding-v1",
3:   "coding_schema_sha256": "bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e",
4:   "design_status": "performance_blinded_model_informed_development",
5:   "documents": [
6:     {
7:       "entity_id": "opentofu",
8:       "evidence_bounds": {
9:         "files_listing_complete": null,
10:         "patch_selection_truncated": false,
11:         "patch_unavailable_count": 0,
12:         "source_text_truncated": false
13:       },
14:       "published_on": "2024-03-08",
15:       "publisher": "opentofu/opentofu",
16:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
17:       "source_type": "github_issue",
18:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1353",
19:       "sources": [
20:         {
21:           "filename": null,
22:           "kind": ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: from __future__ import annotations
2: 
3: import argparse
4: import hashlib
5: import json
6: import zipfile
7: from collections import Counter
8: from pathlib import Path
9: from typing import Any
10: 
11: from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator, FormatChecker
12: 
13: from institution_lab.governance_coding import validate_response
14: 
15: DECISIONS = {"accept", "revise", "reject", "abstain"}
16: INSTITUTIONAL_CLASSES = {
17: 	"effective_institutional_change",
18: 	"announced_institutional_change",
19: 	"proposal_only",
20: }
21: REVIEWER_TYPES = {"human", "llm", "human_llm_assisted"}
22: REVIEWER_ROLES = {"source_adjudicator", "evidence_auditor", "synthesizer"}
23: RESPONSE_SOURCES = {"luna_a", "luna_b", "terra_advisory"}
24: REQUIRED_INPUT_PINS = {
25: 	"workflow_run_id",
26: 	"artifact_id",
27: 	"artifact_sha256",
28: 	"documents_sha256",
29: ...

Found 4 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:
  Line 64:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",

  Line 164:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2109",

  Line 231:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-2573",

  Line 277:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-258",

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "records": [
3:     {
4:       "canonical_ledger_eligible": false,
5:       "full_response_agreement": false,
6:       "luna_a": {
7:         "elapsed_ms": 10610,
8:         "model": "gpt-5.6-luna",
9:         "reasoning_effort": "medium",
10:         "response": {
11:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu technical documentation and user interface writing",
12:           "ambiguity": null,
13:           "announced_on": "2024-03-08",
14:           "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
15:           "confidence": 0.97,
16:           "effective_on": null,
17:           "event_kind": "control_rights",
18:           "power_changes": [
19:             {
20:               "actor": "OpenTofu",
21:               "change_status": "proposed",
22:               "direction": "added",
23:               "evidence_refs": [
24:               ...

Found 10 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-retrieval-development-v2.md:
  Line 64: whose omission motivated V2—entered the corpus but Luna labeled it `no_event`.

  Line 86: `control_event` to the false `institutional_event`. Two V1 boundary false


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-enriched-audit-envelope-v1.md:
  Line 56: Valkey #345 was again labeled `no_event` by Luna. It nevertheless entered the


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-results-v1.2.md:
  Line 28: The five provisional core agreements are three `no_event` records and two

  Line 108:   Terra called it `no_event`; Terra is therefore not a reliable tiebreaker.


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/luna-terra-hard-case-comparison.md:
  Line 56: predictions varied among `no_event`, `abstain`, and once `control_event`. ...

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md

Found 56 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/session-handover-2026-08-27.md:
  Line 6: institutional power precede changes in project performance. The Terraform /

  Line 14: > transitions, and zero records in a canonical institutional power ledger.

  Line 37: 4. **Require grounded evidence.** Every accepted event, date, actor, and right

  Line 92: - strict power-edge recall: variable (75% to 91.7%)

  Line 130: power-graph serialization, causal identification, or performance-outcome


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/sol-reasoning-hard-case-protocol.md:
  Line 15: Does `gpt-5.6-sol` improve institutional-event discovery or strict power-edge

  Line 22: adjudication, event ledger, or canonical power graph.

  Line 51: power-change recall. ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2
2: 
3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27  
4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol
5: 
6: ## Correction
7: 
8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders.
9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict
10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted
11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the
12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called
13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences.
14: 
15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph
16: construction:
17: 
18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://github.com/BYK/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance coding v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": ["record_class", "event_kind", "title", "announced_on", "effective_on", "affected_scope", "body_patch_relation", "power_changes", "confidence", "ambiguity"],
8:   "properties": {
9:     "record_class": {"enum": ["effective_institutional_change", "announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only", "control_event", "no_event", "abstain"]},
10:     "event_kind": {"type": ["string", "null"], "enum": ["leadership", "board_or_steering", "control_rights", "reorganization", "foundation_transfer", "license", "fork", "reunification", "strategy", "product", "external", ...

Found 56 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/.lore.md:
  Line 92: * **Never infer organizational authority or effectiveness beyond bounded source evidence**: Apply a fail-closed, source-first standard to governance adjudication. Treat software ownership, implementation responsibility, technical control, or compatibility language as insufficient to establish organizational power or decision rights. Keep proposals and announcements distinct from implemented changes: unmerged, rejected, or open proposals must not receive effective dates, and implementation evidence must not establish an underlying third-party policy’s effective date. Ground every institutional claim and graph edge in exact verbatim quotes with source IDs, limit conclusions to the directly evidenced scope, and remove unsupported actors, rights, transfers, or enforcement claims. ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
140: 				"luna_b": {"response": response, "schema_valid": True},
141: 				"route_reasons": [],
142: 			},
143: 		],
144: 	}
145: 
146: 
147: def _adjudication() -> dict[str, object]:
148: 	return {
149: 		"schema_version": 1,
150: 		"adjudication_id": "oss-governance-adjudication-v1",
151: 		"design_status": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication",
152: 		"transition_dates_excluded": True,
153: 		"outcome_data_used": False,
154: 		"inputs": {
155: 			"workflow_run_id": 33063470968,
156: 			"artifact_id": 9642983578,
157: 			"artifact_sha256": "0" * 64,
158: 			"documents_sha256": "0" * 64,
159: 			"documents_file_sha256": "1" * 64,
160: 			"coding_package_file_sha256": "2" * 64,
161: 			"protocol_sha256": "3" * 64,
162: 			"coding_schema_sha256": "4" * 64,
163: 			"adjudication_schema_sha256": "5" * 64,
164: 		},
165: 		"reviewers": [
166: 			{
167: ...

Found 14 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 19: 	"proposal_only",

  Line 336: 		if record_class in {"announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only"} and (

  Line 343: 			"proposal_only": {"proposed", "rejected", "unclear"},


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/llm_event_probe.py:
  Line 18: DECISIONS = {"institutional_event", "control_event", "no_event", "abstain"}

  Line 214:     is_event = decision in {"institutional_event", "control_event"}

  Line 232:     elif decision == "control_event":

  Line 234:             errors.append("control_event requires product or external event_kind")

  Line 236:             errors.append("control_event must not invent a power change")

  Line 237:     elif decision == "no_event":

  Line 248:             errors.append("no_event requires null event fields and empty ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: """Prepare and validate performance-blinded coding of enriched governance records."""
2: 
3: from __future__ import annotations
4: 
5: import argparse
6: import hashlib
7: import json
8: import math
9: from collections import Counter
10: from datetime import date
11: from pathlib import Path
12: from typing import Any
13: 
14: RECORD_CLASSES = {
15:     "effective_institutional_change",
16:     "announced_institutional_change",
17:     "proposal_only",
18:     "control_event",
19:     "no_event",
20:     "abstain",
21: }
22: EVENT_KINDS = {
23:     "leadership",
24:     "board_or_steering",
25:     "control_rights",
26:     "reorganization",
27:     "foundation_transfer",
28:     "license",
29:     "fork",
30:     "reunification",
31:     "strategy",
32:     "product",
33:     "external",
34: }
35: RIGHT_KINDS = {
36:     "appoint",
37:     "remove",
38:     ...

No files found

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents.json SHA-256 and inspect each assigned record's full metadata and ordered source envelope",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify v1.2-coding-package.json SHA-256 and inspect only ontology plus direct frozen assigned-record responses",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate all four records with exact evidence and graph-edge revisions",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate IDs, dates, ontology completeness, quote grounding, and final record count",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

Found 8 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py:
  Line 70:     "record_class",

  Line 245:     record_class = response.get("record_class")

  Line 246:     if record_class not in RECORD_CLASSES:

  Line 247:         errors.append("record_class is not allowed")

  Line 304:     institutional = record_class in {

  Line 313:     if record_class == "abstain" and response.get("ambiguity") is None:

  Line 429:         class_equal = bool(ra and rb and ra.get("record_class") == rb.get("record_class"))

  Line 448:             ra.get("record_class") == "abstain" or rb.get("record_class") == "abstain"

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents.json SHA-256 and inspect each assigned record's full metadata and ordered source envelope",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify v1.2-coding-package.json SHA-256 and inspect only ontology plus direct frozen assigned-record responses",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate all four records with exact evidence and graph-edge revisions",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate IDs, dates, ontology completeness, quote grounding, and final record count",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

Found 31 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 308: 		("effective_institutional_change", "2024-04-01", None, "requires effective_on"),

  Line 316: 		("proposal_only", "2024-04-01", "2024-05-01", "must not set effective_on"),

  Line 374: 	adjudication = _institutional_adjudication("effective_institutional_change")

  Line 394: 		"effective_institutional_change": "effective",

  Line 396: 		"proposal_only": "proposed",

  Line 419: 				"2024-04-01" if record_class == "effective_institutional_change" else None

  Line 447: 		("effective_institutional_change", "proposed"),

  Line 449: 		("proposal_only", "effective"),


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_llm_triage_compare.py:
  Line 51:             _result("c", "control_event"),

  Line 56:             _result("c", "control_event"),


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_llm_event_probe.py:
  Line 72:                 "decision": ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": [
8:     "schema_version",
9:     "adjudication_id",
10:     "design_status",
11:     "transition_dates_excluded",
12:     "outcome_data_used",
13:     "inputs",
14:     "reviewers",
15:     "records"
16:   ],
17:   "properties": {
18:     "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19:     "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20:     "design_status": {
21:       "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22:     },
23:     "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24:     "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25:     ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
64:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
65:       "route_reasons": [
66:         "body_patch_relation_disagreement",
67:         "class_disagreement",
68:         "edge_disagreement",
69:         "event_field_disagreement"
70:       ],
71:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1353",
72:       "terra_advisory": {
73:         "elapsed_ms": 8236,
74:         "model": "gpt-5.6-terra",
75:         "reasoning_effort": "xhigh",
76:         "response": {
77:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu technical documentation and user interface writing",
78:           "ambiguity": null,
79:           "announced_on": "2024-03-08",
80:           "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
81:           "confidence": 0.98,
82:           "effective_on": null,
83:           "event_kind": null,
84:           ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
270: 		or evidence_bounds.get("patch_selection_truncated") is True
271: 		or (
272: 			isinstance(evidence_bounds.get("patch_unavailable_count"), int)
273: 			and evidence_bounds["patch_unavailable_count"] > 0
274: 		)
275: 	)
276: 	if bounded_evidence and (
277: 		not isinstance(record.get("evidence_limitations"), str)
278: 		or not record["evidence_limitations"]
279: 	):
280: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: bounded evidence requires evidence_limitations")
281: 
282: 	accepted_from = record.get("accepted_from")
283: 	final_coding = record.get("final_coding")
284: 	if decision == "accept":
285: 		if accepted_from not in RESPONSE_SOURCES:
286: 			errors.append(f"{prefix}: accept requires accepted_from")
287: 		else:
288: 			accepted = _response_for(coding_record, accepted_from)
289: 			if accepted is None:
290: 				errors.append(f"{prefix}: {accepted_from} is ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "records": [
3:     {
4:       "canonical_ledger_eligible": false,
5:       "full_response_agreement": false,
6:       "luna_a": {
7:         "elapsed_ms": 10610,
8:         "model": "gpt-5.6-luna",
9:         "reasoning_effort": "medium",
10:         "response": {
11:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu technical documentation and user interface writing",
12:           "ambiguity": null,
13:           "announced_on": "2024-03-08",
14:           "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
15:           "confidence": 0.97,
16:           "effective_on": null,
17:           "event_kind": "control_rights",
18:           "power_changes": [
19:             {
20:               "actor": "OpenTofu",
21:               "change_status": "proposed",
22:               "direction": "added",
23:               "evidence_refs": [
24:               ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "coding_id": "oss-governance-enriched-coding-v1",
3:   "coding_schema_sha256": "bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e",
4:   "design_status": "performance_blinded_model_informed_development",
5:   "documents": [
6:     {
7:       "entity_id": "opentofu",
8:       "evidence_bounds": {
9:         "files_listing_complete": null,
10:         "patch_selection_truncated": false,
11:         "patch_unavailable_count": 0,
12:         "source_text_truncated": false
13:       },
14:       "published_on": "2024-03-08",
15:       "publisher": "opentofu/opentofu",
16:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-1353",
17:       "source_type": "github_issue",
18:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1353",
19:       "sources": [
20:         {
21:           "filename": null,
22:           "kind": ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
350: 	pins["documents_sha256"] = documents_hash
351: 
352: 	errors, summary = validate_adjudication(
353: 		adjudication,
354: 		documents,
355: 		package,
356: 		verified_pins=pins,
357: 	)
358: 
359: 	assert any("bounded evidence requires evidence_limitations" in error for error in errors)
360: 	assert summary["canonicalization_gate"] == "closed"
361: 
362: 
363: def test_accept_edge_revision_uses_the_accepted_response() -> None:
364: 	adjudication = _adjudication()
365: 	adjudication["records"][0]["graph_edge_revision"]["basis"] = "luna_b"
366: 
367: 	errors, summary = _validate(adjudication)
368: 
369: 	assert any("accept revision basis must equal accepted_from" in error for error in errors)
370: 	assert summary["canonicalization_gate"] == "closed"
371: 
372: 
373: def test_institutional_claims_require_grounded_claim_and_edge_evidence() -> None:
374: ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: from __future__ import annotations
2: 
3: import argparse
4: import hashlib
5: import json
6: import zipfile
7: from collections import Counter
8: from pathlib import Path
9: from typing import Any
10: 
11: from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator, FormatChecker
12: 
13: from institution_lab.governance_coding import validate_response
14: 
15: DECISIONS = {"accept", "revise", "reject", "abstain"}
16: INSTITUTIONAL_CLASSES = {
17: 	"effective_institutional_change",
18: 	"announced_institutional_change",
19: 	"proposal_only",
20: }
21: REVIEWER_TYPES = {"human", "llm", "human_llm_assisted"}
22: REVIEWER_ROLES = {"source_adjudicator", "evidence_auditor", "synthesizer"}
23: RESPONSE_SOURCES = {"luna_a", "luna_b", "terra_advisory"}
24: REQUIRED_INPUT_PINS = {
25: 	"workflow_run_id",
26: 	"artifact_id",
27: 	"artifact_sha256",
28: 	"documents_sha256",
29: ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
250:         errors.append("event_kind is not allowed")
251:     for field in ("title", "affected_scope", "ambiguity"):
252:         if response.get(field) is not None and not _nonempty(response.get(field)):
253:             errors.append(f"{field} must be a non-empty string or null")
254:     for field in ("announced_on", "effective_on"):
255:         if not _valid_date(response.get(field)):
256:             errors.append(f"{field} must be an ISO date or null")
257:     if response.get("body_patch_relation") not in BODY_PATCH_RELATIONS:
258:         errors.append("body_patch_relation is not allowed")
259:     confidence = response.get("confidence")
260:     if (
261:         isinstance(confidence, bool)
262:         or not isinstance(confidence, int | float)
263:         or not math.isfinite(float(confidence))
264:         or not 0 <= float(confidence) <= ...

Creating a style guide/framework for documentation and user interface
Having a consistent written style across multiple authors can help a large project maintain a uniform voice. A written-down style guide, along with linters (and other automation) and human reviews can help take the guess-work out of what that voice should be, and how to maintain it.
There is also the issue of _clarity_. Technical documentation is a different medium with a different form from things like creative writing, or even writing for user interface (the `tofu` CLI tool is a user interface).
I'm proposing a _framework_ for technical documentation and user interface writing. It is not a framework of code, but rather of _thought_ and _style_ to help us make decisions about documentation and user interface writing. Its goal is to lead to more consistent written word, and (hopefully) let that lead to better user interface writing as well.
* A written-down style guide for technical documentation. ...

Alright, now that we have the alpha release behind us and a working alpha registry, it's time to start the discussion around the stable registry design! This is a design that we'll implement to make OpenTofu production-ready, and will be included in the OpenTofu 1.6 stable release.
  - Should provide provider and module discovery and documentation via a human-readable web UI, similar to the legacy Terraform registry (this must be part of the design, but can be implemented after the stable release).
  - Implementation of the registry must be fully open-source.
  - Implements the V1 registry protocol for [providers](https://opentofu.org/docs/internals/provider-registry-protocol) and [modules](https://opentofu.org/docs/internals/module-registry-protocol).
# UPDATE 2023-11-03
The technical steering committee convened yesterday and has chosen the [Homebrew-like registry design](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/741) as the one to go with and implement.