Dashboard › › Session ses_3882ad0d
ses_3882ad0deffeP0QnPMSPOSvmsDcrossProject wasn't being respected — both the ltm.create() call in ltm.ts and the curator.ts call site were using the ternary value ? 1 : 0 which treated undefined as false. Since the LLM might omit the field entirely and undefined should mean "true" (since the system prompt example showed crossProject: false), the fix was to change both sites to use value !== false ? 1 : 0.
[assistant]: Running well! Let me wait for it to finish:
[44/45] ✓ oracle auth-api "What was the commit SHA and message that removed ..." [45/45] ✓ nuum auth-api "What was the commit SHA and message that removed ..." === Coding Memory Eval Results === oracle: 12/15 (80.0%) default: 10/15 (66.7%) nuum: 11/15 (73.3%) === Per-session breakdown === nuum-dev (5 questions): oracle: 3/5 (60.0%) default: 2/5 (40.0%) nuum: 3/5 (60.0%) sentry-cli (5 questions): oracle: 4/5 (80.0%) default: 4/5 (80.0%) nuum: 4/5 (80.0%) auth-api (5 questions): oracle: 5/5 (100.0%) default: 4/5 (80.0%) nuum: 4/5 (80.0%) [assistant]: Initial results are interesting. Let me see what nuum missed vs what default missed:
=== Questions where oracle ✓, default ✗, nuum ✓ (nuum beats default) === Q: What was the PR number and title that was being tested in the sentry-cli session? oracle: ✓ | default: ✗ | nuum: ✓ === Questions where oracle ✓, nuum ✗, default ✓ (default beats nuum) === Q: What was the system-reminder leak bug and which commit fixed it? oracle: ✗ | default: ✓ | nuum: ✗ Q: What specific endpoint replaced `/users/me/` and what CLI command was implemented? oracle: ✓ | default: ✓ | nuum: ✗ === Questions both oracle and nuum got wrong === Q: What was the initial token overrun issue that was investigated at the start of this session? oracle: ✗ | default: ✗ | nuum: ✗ Q: What was the system-reminder leak bug and which commit fixed it? oracle: ✗ | default: ✓ | nuum: ✗ === Nuum correct answers (11/15) === What was the specific FTS5 search bug that was fixed and in which file? What was the crossProject configuration issue with nuum and what was the fix? ...
Question: What was the initial token overrun issue that was investigated at the start of this session? Expected: The gradient context manager was using a hardcoded overhead estimate (FIRST_TURN_OVERHEAD = 15000) instead of calibrating against actual token usage. The fix was to add EMA-based calibration using real input token counts from message.updated events. oracle: ✗ answer=The token overrun issue was investigated and it was found that the `experime default: ✗ answer=I don't know. The context provided doesn't include the beginning of the s nuum: ✗ answer=I don't know. The observations for this session start with "Diagnosed and fi Question: What was the system-reminder leak bug and which commit fixed it? Expected: System-reminder blocks (<system-reminder> tags) from OpenCode's ephemeral wrapping and persisted build-switch.txt were leaking into the nuum gradient raw window. ...
{
"question": "What specific endpoint replaced `/users/me/` and what CLI command was implemented?",
"mode": "nuum",
"correct": false,
"hypothesis": "The `/auth/` endpoint replaced `/users/me/`. A `sentry auth whoami` command was implemented, but the specific details about what information it shows aren't captured in the observations.",
"answer": "The `/auth/` endpoint replaced `/users/me/`. A new `sentry auth whoami` command was implemented that shows the authenticated user's name, email, and organization memberships.",
"judge_response": "No"
}
[assistant]: The nuum answer is partially correct — gets the endpoint right and the command name right, but hedges with "the specific details about what information it shows aren't captured". The judge correctly marked it wrong because the answer is incomplete — it doesn't confirm the user info details (name, email, org memberships). ...
=== ses_389c23eddffe distillations === 1 distillation(s) D1 gen=0 tokens=371: Date: February 19, 2026 * 🟡 (14:11) User previously hit issues with `/users/me/` endpoint for authenticated user info; discovered `/auth/` should be used instead * 🟡 (14:11) User wants to bring back `getCurrentUser` functionality using `/auth/` endpoint and add `sentry auth whoami` command * 🟡 (14:11) Assistant found git commit `600cf9a` that removed `/users/me/` dependency (feat(auth): add token command and remove /users/me/ dependency) by byk at 2025-12-10 * 🟡 (14:11) Assistant analyzed current auth structure: `SentryAuthResponse` schema at `src/types/sentry.ts:213-224`; control silo URL fetched via `getControlSiloUrl()` in `src/lib/sentry-client.ts:285`; `getCurrentUser()` currently stubbed to return null in `src/lib/api-client.ts:405-415` * 🟡 (14:11) Assistant recommended: use `/auth/` endpoint via `getControlSiloUrl()`, leverage existing `SentryUser` type at `src/types/sentry.ts:205-224`, ...
Session ses_389c23eddffe: 224 stored, 1 distillations at minMessages=8 Distilled up through: <no prior> Approximate undistilled: 223 Session ses_391dfe776ffe: 528 stored, 5 distillations at minMessages=8 Distilled through gen=0 entries created at various times [assistant]: The `ses_389c23eddffe` session has only 1 distillation for 224 messages — nearly the entire session is unprocessed. This session is older and likely predates the nuum plugin being installed, or distillation never triggered for it. Let me trigger distillation for both under-distilled sessions now to fix the eval data:
[nuum] Starting distillation for ses_389c23eddffe... [nuum] Distilling segment 0: msgs 0-49 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 1: msgs 50-99 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 2: msgs 100-149 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 3: msgs 150-199 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 4: msgs 200-223 (24 messages) [nuum] Created 5 distillation(s) for ses_389c23eddffe [nuum] Starting distillation for ses_38a242967ffe... [nuum] Distilling segment 0: msgs 0-49 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 1: msgs 50-99 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 2: msgs 100-149 (50 messages) [nuum] Distilling segment 3: msgs 150-198 (49 messages) [nuum] Created 4 distillation(s) for ses_38a242967ffe Now re-running eval with fresh distillations... === Coding Memory Eval Results === oracle: 12/15 (80.0%) default: 10/15 (66.7%) nuum: 12/15 (80.0%) === Per-session breakdown === nuum-dev (5 questions): oracle: 3/5 (60.0%) default: 2/5 (40.0%) nuum: 3/5 ...
=== Final comparison (oracle ✓ = ground truth) ===
Both oracle and nuum wrong (judge too strict or answer wrong):
Q: "What was the initial token overrun issue that was investigated at the start of th..."
oracle: ✗ | default: ✗ | nuum: ✗
Q: "What was the system-reminder leak bug and which commit fixed it?"
oracle: ✗ | default: ✓ | nuum: ✗
Nuum correct, default wrong (nuum advantage):
Q: "What was the crossProject configuration issue with nuum and what was the fix?"
oracle: ✓ | default: ✗ | nuum: ✓
Q: "What was the PR number and title that was being tested in the sentry-cli session?"
oracle: ✓ | default: ✗ | nuum: ✓
Q: "What specific endpoint replaced `/users/me/` and what CLI command was implemented?"
oracle: ✓ | default: ✓ | nuum: ✓
[assistant]: The two shared failures are notable:
1. **"Initial token overrun"** — all three modes miss this. ...
On branch main Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: eval/results/coding_eval.jsonl modified: src/gradient.ts modified: src/index.ts Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) MEMORY_PLAN.md README.md no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") eval/results/coding_eval.jsonl | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- src/gradient.ts | 13 ++++++++++--- src/index.ts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gradient.ts b/src/gradient.ts
index 98b838c..5e71341 100644
--- a/src/gradient.ts
+++ b/src/gradient.ts
@@ -363,6 +363,10 @@ export type TransformResult = {
distilledTokens: number;
rawTokens: number;
totalTokens: number;
+ // Budget context (for display in context inspector)
+ usable: number;
+ distilledBudget: number;
+ rawBudget: number;
};
// Signal that we need urgent distillation
@@ -400,7 +404,7 @@ export function transform(input: {
rawBudget,
strip: "none",
});
- if (layer1) return { ...layer1, layer: 1 };
+ if (layer1) return { ...layer1, layer: 1, usable, distilledBudget, rawBudget };
// Layer 2: Strip tool outputs from older messages, keep last 2 turns
const layer2 = tryFit({
@@ -414,7 +418,7 @@ export function transform(input: {
});
if (layer2) {
urgentDistillation = true;
- return { ...layer2, layer: 2 };
+ return { ...layer2, layer: 2, usable, distilledBudget, rawBudget };
}
// Layer 3: ...
e2150b3 Phase 2: Observation-log format + temporal anchoring + eval harness a2a2b21 Default crossProject to true in ltm.create and curator 5fb7ecb Fix prefill error: replace fully-stripped messages with placeholder instead of dropping e6ebbe9 Fix prefill error: preserve messages that become empty after system-reminder stripping c054f64 Strip all system-reminder blocks from raw window, not just user-message wrappers
[main 42b2619] Expose gradient budget fields in TransformResult and write stats to part metadata 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Committed as 42b2619. What's next?