Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Distillation
380dd16e-d3c7-417e-b3a4-13608fdd48fa["lore_tm_v1_BIPnP8G_ib19wGOYFJdhgKgYp7k7qzRtX2MP5h8_O8M","lore_tm_v1_F4Ljc1bA_fLS1tmq3hgL38U8WcQsNYTNP0hmDOn5puE","lore_tm_v1_qcAIvDwB5I1mFzfY1MNgO9gDS9R4aPgUmNudiVBl7MA","lore_tm_v1_3pWz5uKRYPENxw7qLFnI3JodHmrJSNuMEp0K0aPyRdY","lore_tm_v1_TamDKWuxkKS7dVGquJpXSX5We_5kl6ozs3Jw5VAfoyk","lore_tm_v1_yhVycugz7HTwP1_dgSdcWH6MZdrC_jHkenNsPkscWec","lore_tm_v1_P5buFMzWH7k3BidlXnN9ZUBT_CXp8OlzRZTHyaxVWm4"]
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py _validate_record() requires exact source_url agreement, a valid decision, unique known non-empty reviewer_ids, non-empty rationale, source-first source_audit, exact frozen source_ids ordering, and exact evidence_bounds; bounded evidence requires non-empty evidence_limitations._validate_record() decision rules: accept requires accepted_from in RESPONSE_SOURCES and final_coding exactly equal to that frozen response; revise/reject cannot set accepted_from; resolved decisions require valid final_coding; abstain requires null final_coding, non-empty unresolved_reason, and null graph_edge_revision; resolved decisions require null unresolved_reason and cannot use final class abstain; reject must resolve to a non-institutional class._validate_record() institutional-status rules: effective_institutional_change requires effective_on and permits only effective power-edge status; announced_institutional_change requires announced_on, prohibits effective_on, and permits only announced; proposal_only prohibits effective_on and permits proposed, rejected, or unclear._validate_record() validates every claim_evidence_refs quote against the indexed frozen source; institutional classes must ground every non-null field in CLAIM_FIELDS. graph_edge_revision must be derived by graph_edge_diff(), and an accepted record’s revision basis must equal accepted_from._source_index() adds record_metadata as canonical compact sorted JSON containing record_id, source_url, published_on, publisher, and source_type. _evidence_errors() requires exact keys, a valid claim field, an existing frozen source_id, and a non-empty quote occurring verbatim in that source./home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py verify_input_manifest() requires exactly REQUIRED_INPUT_PINS, positive integer workflow_run_id and artifact_id, exact FROZEN_INPUT_PINS, matching SHA-256 values for the artifact/documents/coding package/protocol/coding schema/adjudication schema, byte-identical ZIP members documents.json and v1.2-adjudication-package.json, and matching canonical documents_sha256./home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json defines schema version 1, design status performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication, transition_dates_excluded: true, outcome_data_used: false, and exactly 40 records (minItems: 40, maxItems: 40) for a complete adjudication artifact.human, llm, and human_llm_assisted; roles source_adjudicator, evidence_auditor, and synthesizer; decisions accept, revise, reject, and abstain; response/revision sources luna_a, luna_b, terra_advisory, or null where allowed.opentofu-github-issue-340: PASS, opentofu-github-pr-1010: PASS, opentofu-github-pr-1107: PASS, opentofu-github-pr-1152: PASS, reviewer: PASS, and ordered_unique_record_count: 4.documents.json hash 2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce was verified; 4. coding-package hash 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769 was verified; 5. no performance outcomes, detector outputs, transition dates, desired results, Terra advisory, package summaries, or unrelated reports were used; 6. no files were changed; 7. all 4 adjudication objects and exact quotes passed the repository record validator.reviewer_id: "opencode-sol-opentofu-a2", reviewer_type: "llm", model: "openai/gpt-5.6-sol", role: "source_adjudicator", assistance "Source-first review of four frozen OpenTofu records", under design status performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication.opentofu-github-issue-340: accepted luna_b; final coding was no_event, null event_kind, title Proposal to enable GitHub Discussions, null announced/effective dates, scope opentofu/opentofu repository, relation body_only, no power changes, confidence 0.98, null ambiguity. Rationale: it is a proposed repository discussion feature without implementation or organizational-rights change. Limitation: only the issue body is frozen, with no state/comments/closing/implementation evidence. Graph revision basis luna_b, with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-issue-340 claim evidence used exact body quotes: record class — We could enable github discussions to have a sort of forum with minimal effort from the admin and great value to the community/maintainers.; title — Open up github discussions on this repo; affected scope — Enable github discussions for this repo.; body/patch relation — ### Summary. Source audit listed only body; bounds were files_listing_complete: null, patch_selection_truncated: false, patch_unavailable_count: 0, source_text_truncated: false.opentofu-github-pr-1010: accepted luna_b; final coding was control_event/product, title TSC summary covering registry namespace and GA launch decisions, announced_on: "2023-12-14", null effective date, scope OpenTofu registry namespace and GA launch timing, relation consistent, no power changes, confidence 0.98, null ambiguity. Rationale: merged meeting-summary product decisions did not alter organizational rights or prove the January GA launch occurred. Limitation: complete sole-file patch records decisions but no downstream release or implementation. Graph revision basis luna_b, with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-1010 claim evidence used: patch:0 record-class quote beginning **Vote:** Should we (a) Release GA on Dec 20th if ready as soft launch...; event-kind quote Launch date of GA; body title quote Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-11; patch title/scope quotes Changing default registry namespace to opentofu and Launch date of GA; pr_metadata announced-date quote "merged_at": "2023-12-14T10:19:23Z"; relation quotes Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-11 and ## 2023-12-11. Source audit listed body, pr_metadata, patch:0, with complete/untruncated bounds and zero unavailable patches.opentofu-github-pr-1107: accepted luna_a; final coding was control_event/product, title Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends, announced_on: "2024-01-11", null effective date, scope module sources and backends, relation consistent, no power changes, confidence 0.97, ambiguity The pull request is closed and unmerged, so implementation effectiveness is not shown. Rationale: body and selected patch consistently describe technical-preview product work, while draft/closed/unmerged status establishes neither effective implementation nor institutional-rights change. Graph revision basis luna_a, with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-1107 evidence limitation stated that the frozen envelope contains only selected patch internal/command/apply.go although metadata reports 23 changed files; the selection is untruncated with no unavailable selected patch, but cannot support claims about all changed files, while closed/unmerged status is explicit.opentofu-github-pr-1107 claim evidence used body quote Current state of this work: Technical Preview. Most components should be functional, but may have unexpected bugs or limitations., pr_metadata quotes "draft": true and "merged": false, body implementation quote This is the initial implementation of a static evaluation context that can be used to evaluate expression that do not rely on any state data (vars/locals only)., title/scope quote Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends, record_metadata quote "published_on":"2024-01-11", and relation quotes This is the initial implementation of a static evaluation context plus patch:0 quote c.GatherVariables(args.Vars).opentofu-github-pr-1152: accepted luna_a; final coding was no_event, null event kind and dates, title TSC governance summary added, scope OpenTofu Technical Steering Committee documentation, relation consistent, no power changes, confidence 0.93, ambiguity The merged patch documents the TSC's existing decision authority and membership but does not show that organizational rights changed. Rationale: the patch documents already-referenced governance rather than creating/transferring rights or demonstrating a membership change. Limitation: the complete sole-file envelope does not establish when or how the documented authority or membership originally took effect. Graph revision basis luna_a, with no added or removed edges.opentofu-github-pr-1152 claim evidence used body record-class quote This information has been referenced in a few places, but it is good to have a clear description in the repo to help explain the issue flow and governance., body title/relation quote Add details on who/what/why the TSC is and list of current members, patch scope quote The Technical Steering Committee is a group comprised of people from companies and projects backing OpenTofu., and patch relation quote The current members of the steering committee are:. Source audit listed body, pr_metadata, patch:0, with complete/untruncated bounds and zero unavailable patches.record_count: 4 and terminated with EVIDENCE-COMPLETE.