Session 0HDu8Ox6cjNY

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents SHA-256 and inspect all four assigned source records in order",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify package SHA-256 and inspect only the four direct coding responses after source audit",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate claims and graph edges against exact source quotes",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate four complete outputs, dates, provenance, and record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce  /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json

Found 4 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json:
  Line 104:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-340",

  Line 126:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-pr-1010",

  Line 160:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-pr-1107",

  Line 194:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-pr-1152",

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
90:           "text": "Replace Official Registry\n\nDue to the Public Terraform Registry ToC change, OpenTF will not use it as the default registry.\r\n\r\nHowever, we still want OpenTF to be a drop-in replacement, so all references to providers and modules should work as-is. This is esp. important because people can use modules which themselves reference other modules, and those indirect references are hard to change.\r\n\r\nThis means we need to replace the official registry in OpenTF.\r\n\r\nIt's worth noting that the registry is mostly a redirector to GitHub, and is heavily coupled with GitHub concepts like Releases. Only HashiCorp provider binaries (not modules) are hosted directly from the registry.\r\n\r\n# UPDATE 2023-10-12\r\n\r\nAlright, now that we have the alpha release behind us and a working alpha registry, it's time to start the ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT:
Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-11
END_SOURCE
SOURCE_ID: pr_metadata
KIND: github_pr_metadata
FILENAME: null
TEXT:
{"base_sha": "fff368d2ee8750de01e8f3f1118a8af8dd650797", "changed_files": 1, "draft": false, "head_sha": "61eb05ef4910237a6386431f98d008a7f8574234", "merge_commit_sha": "2d55e6fcde77959a5c3cdbbbdd041eca9715a512", "merged": true, "merged_at": "2023-12-14T10:19:23Z", "state": "closed"}
END_SOURCE
SOURCE_ID: patch:0
KIND: github_pr_patch
FILENAME: TSC_SUMMARY.md
TEXT:
@@ -1,4 +1,111 @@
-# Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary
+# Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary  
+
+## 2023-12-11
+Steering committee summary### Attendees:
+
+- Igor Savchenko ([@DiscyDel](https://github.com/DicsyDel))
+- Marcin Wyszynski ([@marcinwyszynski](https://github.com/marcinwyszynski))
+- Roger Simms ([@allofthesepeople](https://github.com/allofthesepeople))
+- Roni Frantchi ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT:
Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends

This is the initial implementation of a static evaluation context that can be used to evaluate expression that do not rely on any state data (vars/locals only). 

This pretty closely follows the plan detailed in RFC #1042 as I had already started experimenting with this code and knew roughly what I needed to change.  All of the examples detailed in the RFC should be functional with this PR.

Current state of this work: Technical Preview.  Most components should be functional, but may have unexpected bugs or limitations.

TODO:
* [x] Circular references
* [ ] Fix a *lot* of tests
* [ ] Write a *lot* of tests
* [ ] Dramatically improve diagnostics.  The required information is there, but not well formatted.
* [ ] Make sure all module calls are passing the correct parameter context.  This was ad-hoc to start. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT:
Add details on who/what/why the TSC is and list of current members

This information has been referenced in a few places, but it is good to have a clear description in the repo to help explain the issue flow and governance.

Also fixed the spelling of Omry Hay's name.
END_SOURCE
SOURCE_ID: pr_metadata
KIND: github_pr_metadata
FILENAME: null
TEXT:
{"base_sha": "86e18c0ec3dcb392633a03cd7036b8c44417ad27", "changed_files": 1, "draft": false, "head_sha": "6350c001cb565eb34fa4dea6ab4db003c975e0d2", "merge_commit_sha": "3d4db7126f813413cfef5d371be37ffa58a51bb6", "merged": true, "merged_at": "2024-01-19T15:56:40Z", "state": "closed"}
END_SOURCE
SOURCE_ID: patch:0
KIND: github_pr_patch
FILENAME: TSC_SUMMARY.md
TEXT:
@@ -1,7 +1,17 @@
 # Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary  
 
+The Technical Steering Committee is a group comprised of people from companies and projects backing OpenTofu. ...

{"entity_id":"opentofu","evidence_bounds":{"files_listing_complete":null,"patch_selection_truncated":false,"patch_unavailable_count":0,"source_text_truncated":false},"published_on":"2023-09-07","publisher":"opentofu/opentofu","record_id":"opentofu-github-issue-340","source_type":"github_issue","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340","source_manifest":[{"filename":null,"kind":"github_body","source_id":"body"}]}
SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT:
Open up github discussions on this repo

### Summary

Enable github discussions for this repo.

### Problem Statement

There are a lot of questions around the project/code/governance/... especially in the early moments of this project. We could enable github discussions to have a sort of forum with minimal effort from the admin and great value to the community/maintainers. Issues should be code-related, github discussions are for organizational questions and later also support questions. ...

{"entity_id":"opentofu","evidence_bounds":{"files_listing_complete":true,"patch_selection_truncated":false,"patch_unavailable_count":0,"source_text_truncated":false},"published_on":"2023-12-14","publisher":"opentofu/opentofu","record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1010","source_type":"github_pull_request","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1010","source_manifest":[{"filename":null,"kind":"github_body","source_id":"body"},{"filename":null,"kind":"github_pr_metadata","source_id":"pr_metadata"},{"filename":"TSC_SUMMARY.md","kind":"github_pr_patch","source_id":"patch:0"}]}
{"entity_id":"opentofu","evidence_bounds":{"files_listing_complete":true,"patch_selection_truncated":false,"patch_unavailable_count":0,"source_text_truncated":false},"published_on":"2024-01-11","publisher":"opentofu/opentofu","record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1107","source_type":"github_pull_request","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1107","source_manifest":[{"filename":null,"kind":"gith...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents SHA-256 and inspect all four assigned source records in order",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify package SHA-256 and inspect only the four direct coding responses after source audit",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate claims and graph edges against exact source quotes",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate four complete outputs, dates, provenance, and record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769  /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json

["records","schema_version","summary"]

{"type":"array","length":40,"record_keys":["canonical_ledger_eligible","full_response_agreement","luna_a","luna_b","provisional_core_agreement","record_id","route_reasons","source_url","terra_advisory"],"record_ids":["opentofu-github-issue-1353","opentofu-github-issue-2109","opentofu-github-issue-2573","opentofu-github-issue-258","opentofu-github-issue-340","opentofu-github-pr-1010","opentofu-github-pr-1107","opentofu-github-pr-1152","opentofu-github-pr-1650","opentofu-github-pr-2830","opentofu-github-pr-2953","opentofu-github-pr-2959","opentofu-github-pr-3473","opentofu-github-pr-3559","opentofu-github-pr-4018","opentofu-github-pr-727","opentofu-github-pr-823","opentofu-github-pr-990","terraform-github-issue-22468","terraform-github-issue-34139","terraform-github-issue-35563","terraform-github-pr-21175","terraform-github-pr-21345","terraform-github-pr-22332","terraform-github-pr-22745","terraform-github-pr-33661","terraform-github-pr-34096","terraform-github-pr-34103","terraform-githu...

{"record_id":"opentofu-github-issue-340","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340","luna_a_keys":["elapsed_ms","model","reasoning_effort","response","schema_valid","validation_errors"],"luna_b_keys":["elapsed_ms","model","reasoning_effort","response","schema_valid","validation_errors"]}
{"record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1010","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1010","luna_a_keys":["elapsed_ms","model","reasoning_effort","response","schema_valid","validation_errors"],"luna_b_keys":["elapsed_ms","model","reasoning_effort","response","schema_valid","validation_errors"]}
{"record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1107","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1107","luna_a_keys":["elapsed_ms","model","reasoning_effort","response","schema_valid","validation_errors"],"luna_b_keys":["elapsed_ms","model","reasoning_effort","response","schema_valid","validation_errors"]}
{"record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1152","source_url":"https://github.com/opentof...

{"record_id":"opentofu-github-issue-340","luna_a_response_keys":["affected_scope","ambiguity","announced_on","body_patch_relation","confidence","effective_on","event_kind","power_changes","record_class","title"],"luna_b_response_keys":["affected_scope","ambiguity","announced_on","body_patch_relation","confidence","effective_on","event_kind","power_changes","record_class","title"]}
{"record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1010","luna_a_response_keys":["affected_scope","ambiguity","announced_on","body_patch_relation","confidence","effective_on","event_kind","power_changes","record_class","title"],"luna_b_response_keys":["affected_scope","ambiguity","announced_on","body_patch_relation","confidence","effective_on","event_kind","power_changes","record_class","title"]}
{"record_id":"opentofu-github-pr-1107","luna_a_response_keys":["affected_scope","ambiguity","announced_on","body_patch_relation","confidence","effective_on","event_kind","power_changes","record_class","title"],"luna_b_response_keys":[...

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-340",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "opentofu/opentofu repository",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2023-09-07",
    "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
    "confidence": 0.98,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "Proposal to enable GitHub Discussions"
  },
  "luna_b": {
    "affected_scope": "opentofu/opentofu repository",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": null,
    "body_patch_relation": "body_only",
    "confidence": 0.98,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": null,
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "no_event",
    "title": "Proposal to enable GitHub Discussions"
  }
}

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-pr-1010",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1010",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu GA release",
    "ambiguity": "The source records a launch-date decision, not evidence that the GA release occurred.",
    "announced_on": "2023-12-14",
    "body_patch_relation": "patch_only",
    "confidence": 0.86,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "TSC decides to release OpenTofu GA on January 10"
  },
  "luna_b": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu registry namespace and GA launch timing",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2023-12-14",
    "body_patch_relation": "consistent",
    "confidence": 0.98,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "TSC summary covering registry namespace and GA launch decisions"
  }
}

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-pr-1107",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1107",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "module sources and backends",
    "ambiguity": "The pull request is closed and unmerged, so implementation effectiveness is not shown.",
    "announced_on": "2024-01-11",
    "body_patch_relation": "consistent",
    "confidence": 0.97,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends"
  },
  "luna_b": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu module sources and backends",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": "2024-01-11",
    "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
    "confidence": 0.98,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": "product",
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "control_event",
    "title": "Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources ...

{
  "record_id": "opentofu-github-pr-1152",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/1152",
  "luna_a": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu Technical Steering Committee documentation",
    "ambiguity": "The merged patch documents the TSC's existing decision authority and membership but does not show that organizational rights changed.",
    "announced_on": null,
    "body_patch_relation": "consistent",
    "confidence": 0.93,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": null,
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "no_event",
    "title": "TSC governance summary added"
  },
  "luna_b": {
    "affected_scope": "OpenTofu Technical Steering Committee documentation",
    "ambiguity": null,
    "announced_on": null,
    "body_patch_relation": "consistent",
    "confidence": 0.95,
    "effective_on": null,
    "event_kind": null,
    "power_changes": [],
    "record_class": "no_event",
    "title": "Added TSC summary and current members"
  }
}

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": [
8:     "schema_version",
9:     "adjudication_id",
10:     "design_status",
11:     "transition_dates_excluded",
12:     "outcome_data_used",
13:     "inputs",
14:     "reviewers",
15:     "records"
16:   ],
17:   "properties": {
18:     "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19:     "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20:     "design_status": {
21:       "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22:     },
23:     "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24:     "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25:     ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://github.com/BYK/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance coding v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": ["record_class", "event_kind", "title", "announced_on", "effective_on", "affected_scope", "body_patch_relation", "power_changes", "confidence", "ambiguity"],
8:   "properties": {
9:     "record_class": {"enum": ["effective_institutional_change", "announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only", "control_event", "no_event", "abstain"]},
10:     "event_kind": {"type": ["string", "null"], "enum": ["leadership", "board_or_steering", "control_rights", "reorganization", "foundation_transfer", "license", "fork", "reunification", "strategy", "product", "external", ...

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2
2: 
3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27  
4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol
5: 
6: ## Correction
7: 
8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders.
9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict
10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted
11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the
12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called
13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences.
14: 
15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph
16: construction:
17: 
18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...

Found 100 matches (more matches available)
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 43: 	assert set(coding["body_patch_relation"]["enum"]) == BODY_PATCH_RELATIONS

  Line 77: 		"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",

  Line 314: 		("proposal_only", "2024-04-01", "2024-05-01", "must not set effective_on"),

  Line 394: 		"proposal_only": "proposed",

  Line 408: 				"body_patch_relation",

  Line 420: 			"body_patch_relation": "body_only",

  Line 447: 		("proposal_only", "effective"),

  Line 468: 				"body_patch_relation",

  Line 478: 			"body_patch_relation": "body_only",


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_llm_triage_compare.py:
  Line 51:             _result("c", "control_event"),

  Line 56:             _result("c", "control_event"),


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_llm_event_probe.py:
  Line 72:                 "decision": "control_event",

  Line 110:         "decision": ...

Found 3 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py:
  Line 62:     "patch_supersedes_body",

  Line 63:     "body_only",

  Line 64:     "patch_only",

Found 13 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py:
  Line 70:     "record_class",

  Line 76:     "body_patch_relation",

  Line 245:     record_class = response.get("record_class")

  Line 246:     if record_class not in RECORD_CLASSES:

  Line 247:         errors.append("record_class is not allowed")

  Line 257:     if response.get("body_patch_relation") not in BODY_PATCH_RELATIONS:

  Line 258:         errors.append("body_patch_relation is not allowed")

  Line 304:     institutional = record_class in {

  Line 313:     if record_class == "abstain" and response.get("ambiguity") is None:

  Line 429:         class_equal = bool(ra and rb and ra.get("record_class") == rb.get("record_class"))

  Line 445:         if ra and rb and ra.get("body_patch_relation") != rb.get("body_patch_relation"):

  Line 446:             reasons.append("body_patch_relation_disagreement")

  Line 448:             ra.get("record_class") == "abstain" or ...

Found 28 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/.lore.md:
  Line 27: * **compare\_codings strict edge signature**: Trap: comparing actor, right, target, direction, and status looks like strict edge agreement because these fields identify the apparent action. Fix: include scope and complete evidence references, and route body/patch-relation disagreement separately; omitting them caused V1.1 to mislabel six records as provisional exact agreement.

  Line 39: * **governance\_coding semantic validation**: Trap: a schema-valid frozen response with reproducible quotes looks admissible because its structure and citations validate. Fix: enforce protocol semantics separately: proposals are not institutional events, meeting notes do not prove product implementation, and merge metadata proves enactment only for merged rights wording. ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
280: 	final_coding = record.get("final_coding")
281: 	if decision == "accept":
282: 		if accepted_from not in RESPONSE_SOURCES:
283: 			errors.append(f"{prefix}: accept requires accepted_from")
284: 		else:
285: 			accepted = _response_for(coding_record, accepted_from)
286: 			if accepted is None:
287: 				errors.append(f"{prefix}: {accepted_from} is not a valid frozen response")
288: 			elif final_coding != accepted:
289: 				errors.append(f"{prefix}: accepted coding does not equal {accepted_from}")
290: 	elif accepted_from is not None:
291: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: only accept may set accepted_from")
292: 
293: 	if decision in {"accept", "revise", "reject"}:
294: 		if not isinstance(final_coding, dict):
295: 			errors.append(f"{prefix}: resolved decision requires final_coding")
296: 		else:
297: 			for error in validate_response(final_coding, ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: from __future__ import annotations
2: 
3: import argparse
4: import hashlib
5: import json
6: import zipfile
7: from collections import Counter
8: from pathlib import Path
9: from typing import Any
10: 
11: from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator, FormatChecker
12: 
13: from institution_lab.governance_coding import validate_response
14: 
15: DECISIONS = {"accept", "revise", "reject", "abstain"}
16: INSTITUTIONAL_CLASSES = {
17: 	"effective_institutional_change",
18: 	"announced_institutional_change",
19: 	"proposal_only",
20: }
21: REVIEWER_TYPES = {"human", "llm", "human_llm_assisted"}
22: REVIEWER_ROLES = {"source_adjudicator", "evidence_auditor", "synthesizer"}
23: RESPONSE_SOURCES = {"luna_a", "luna_b", "terra_advisory"}
24: REQUIRED_INPUT_PINS = {
25: 	"workflow_run_id",
26: 	"artifact_id",
27: 	"artifact_sha256",
28: 	"documents_sha256",
29: ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
220:         "design_status": "performance_blinded_model_informed_development",
221:         "transition_dates_excluded": True,
222:         "outcome_data_used": False,
223:         "model_input_fields": MODEL_INPUT_FIELDS,
224:         "documents": output,
225:     }
226: 
227: 
228: def parse_response(text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
229:     candidate = text.strip()
230:     if candidate.startswith("```"):
231:         lines = candidate.splitlines()
232:         if len(lines) < 3 or lines[-1].strip() != "```":
233:             raise ValueError("unterminated JSON code fence")
234:         candidate = "\n".join(lines[1:-1]).strip()
235:     value = json.loads(candidate)
236:     if not isinstance(value, dict):
237:         raise ValueError("response must be an object")
238:     return value
239: 
240: 
241: def validate_response(response: dict[str, Any], ...

[
  {
    "content": "Verify documents SHA-256 and inspect all four assigned source records in order",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Verify package SHA-256 and inspect only the four direct coding responses after source audit",
    "status": "completed",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Adjudicate claims and graph edges against exact source quotes",
    "status": "in_progress",
    "priority": "high"
  },
  {
    "content": "Validate four complete outputs, dates, provenance, and record count",
    "status": "pending",
    "priority": "high"
  }
]

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
95:       "entity_id": "opentofu",
96:       "evidence_bounds": {
97:         "files_listing_complete": null,
98:         "patch_selection_truncated": false,
99:         "patch_unavailable_count": 0,
100:         "source_text_truncated": false
101:       },
102:       "published_on": "2023-09-07",
103:       "publisher": "opentofu/opentofu",
104:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-340",
105:       "source_type": "github_issue",
106:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340",
107:       "sources": [
108:         {
109:           "filename": null,
110:           "kind": "github_body",
111:           "source_id": "body",
112:           "text": "Open up github discussions on this repo\n\n### Summary\r\n\r\nEnable github discussions for this repo.\r\n\r\n### Problem Statement\r\n\r\nThere are a lot of questions ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: """Prepare and validate performance-blinded coding of enriched governance records."""
2: 
3: from __future__ import annotations
4: 
5: import argparse
6: import hashlib
7: import json
8: import math
9: from collections import Counter
10: from datetime import date
11: from pathlib import Path
12: from typing import Any
13: 
14: RECORD_CLASSES = {
15:     "effective_institutional_change",
16:     "announced_institutional_change",
17:     "proposal_only",
18:     "control_event",
19:     "no_event",
20:     "abstain",
21: }
22: EVENT_KINDS = {
23:     "leadership",
24:     "board_or_steering",
25:     "control_rights",
26:     "reorganization",
27:     "foundation_transfer",
28:     "license",
29:     "fork",
30:     "reunification",
31:     "strategy",
32:     "product",
33:     "external",
34: }
35: RIGHT_KINDS = {
36:     "appoint",
37:     "remove",
38:     ...

Found 5 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py:
  Line 15:     "effective_institutional_change",

  Line 17:     "proposal_only",

  Line 25:     "control_rights",

  Line 305:         "effective_institutional_change",

  Line 307:         "proposal_only",

Found 15 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py:
  Line 70:     "record_class",

  Line 77:     "power_changes",

  Line 245:     record_class = response.get("record_class")

  Line 246:     if record_class not in RECORD_CLASSES:

  Line 247:         errors.append("record_class is not allowed")

  Line 273:     changes = response.get("power_changes")

  Line 275:         errors.append("power_changes must be an array")

  Line 278:         prefix = f"power_changes[{index}]"

  Line 304:     institutional = record_class in {

  Line 310:         errors.append("institutional/proposal records require power_changes")

  Line 312:         errors.append("non-institutional records must not contain power_changes")

  Line 313:     if record_class == "abstain" and response.get("ambiguity") is None:

  Line 381:     for edge in response.get("power_changes", []):

  Line 429:         class_equal = bool(ra and rb and ra.get("record_class") == ...

Found 100 matches (more matches available)
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 17: 	"effective_institutional_change",

  Line 18: 	"announced_institutional_change",

  Line 323: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: reject must resolve to a non-institutional class")

  Line 327: 			record_class == "effective_institutional_change"

  Line 330: 			errors.append(f"{prefix}: effective institutional change requires effective_on")

  Line 332: 			record_class == "announced_institutional_change"

  Line 335: 			errors.append(f"{prefix}: announced institutional change requires announced_on")

  Line 336: 		if record_class in {"announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only"} and (

  Line 341: 			"effective_institutional_change": {"effective"},

  Line 342: 			"announced_institutional_change": {"announced"},


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/source_enrichment.py:
  Line 41:     """Union narrow-query hits ...

No files found

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md

No files found

No files found

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2
2: 
3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27  
4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol
5: 
6: ## Correction
7: 
8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders.
9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict
10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted
11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the
12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called
13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences.
14: 
15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph
16: construction:
17: 
18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": [
8:     "schema_version",
9:     "adjudication_id",
10:     "design_status",
11:     "transition_dates_excluded",
12:     "outcome_data_used",
13:     "inputs",
14:     "reviewers",
15:     "records"
16:   ],
17:   "properties": {
18:     "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19:     "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20:     "design_status": {
21:       "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22:     },
23:     "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24:     "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25:     ...

Found 100 matches (more matches available)
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:
  Line 11:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu technical documentation and user interface writing",

  Line 14:           "body_patch_relation": "body_only",

  Line 21:               "change_status": "proposed",

  Line 49:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu documentation and user interface writing",

  Line 52:           "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",

  Line 66:         "body_patch_relation_disagreement",

  Line 77:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu technical documentation and user interface writing",

  Line 80:           "body_patch_relation": "body_only",

  Line 100:           "affected_scope": "OpenTofu provider installation and distribution",

  Line 103:           "body_patch_relation": "body_only",

  Line 110:               "change_status": "proposed",

  Line 134:           "affected_scope": ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
220: 		errors.append(f"{path}: Gemini is restricted to event triage")
221: 	return errors
222: 
223: 
224: def _validate_record(
225: 	record: Any,
226: 	document: dict[str, Any],
227: 	coding_record: dict[str, Any],
228: 	reviewer_ids: set[str],
229: ) -> list[str]:
230: 	if not isinstance(record, dict):
231: 		return ["adjudication record must be an object"]
232: 	record_id = record.get("record_id")
233: 	prefix = f"record {record_id}"
234: 	errors: list[str] = []
235: 	if record.get("source_url") != document.get("source_url"):
236: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: source_url does not match frozen document")
237: 	decision = record.get("decision")
238: 	if decision not in DECISIONS:
239: 		errors.append(f"{prefix}: invalid decision")
240: 	listed_reviewers = record.get("reviewer_ids")
241: 	if not isinstance(listed_reviewers, list) or not ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
105: 		members = {
106: 			"documents.json": documents,
107: 			"v1.2-adjudication-package.json": coding_package,
108: 		}
109: 		for member_name, durable_path in members.items():
110: 			try:
111: 				member_bytes = archive.read(member_name)
112: 			except KeyError as error:
113: 				raise ValueError(f"artifact member missing: {member_name}") from error
114: 			if member_bytes != durable_path.read_bytes():
115: 				raise ValueError(f"artifact member mismatch: {member_name}")
116: 	documents_value = json.loads(documents.read_text())
117: 	if manifest.get("documents_sha256") != canonical_sha256(documents_value):
118: 		raise ValueError("input manifest mismatch: documents_sha256")
119: 	return dict(manifest)
120: 
121: 
122: def _duplicates(values: list[str]) -> set[str]:
123: 	counts = Counter(values)
124: 	return {value for value, count in counts.items() ...

Found 1 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/llm_event_probe.py:
  Line 234:             errors.append("control_event requires product or external event_kind")

Found 30 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py:
  Line 44: 	assert set(coding["body_patch_relation"]["enum"]) == BODY_PATCH_RELATIONS

  Line 78: 		"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",

  Line 305: 	("record_class", "announced_on", "effective_on", "message"),

  Line 315: 		("proposal_only", "2024-04-01", "2024-05-01", "must not set effective_on"),

  Line 395: 		"proposal_only": "proposed",

  Line 409: 				"body_patch_relation",

  Line 418: 				"2024-04-01" if record_class == "effective_institutional_change" else None

  Line 421: 			"body_patch_relation": "body_only",

  Line 448: 		("proposal_only", "effective"),

  Line 469: 				"body_patch_relation",

  Line 479: 			"body_patch_relation": "body_only",


/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_coding.py:
  Line 27:     assert set(properties["body_patch_relation"]["enum"]) == BODY_PATCH_RELATIONS

  Line 73:         "record_class": ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
300:       }
301:     },
302:     {
303:       "canonical_ledger_eligible": false,
304:       "full_response_agreement": false,
305:       "luna_a": {
306:         "elapsed_ms": 2922,
307:         "model": "gpt-5.6-luna",
308:         "reasoning_effort": "medium",
309:         "response": {
310:           "affected_scope": "opentofu/opentofu repository",
311:           "ambiguity": null,
312:           "announced_on": "2023-09-07",
313:           "body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
314:           "confidence": 0.98,
315:           "effective_on": null,
316:           "event_kind": "product",
317:           "power_changes": [],
318:           "record_class": "control_event",
319:           "title": "Proposal to enable GitHub Discussions"
320:         },
321:         "schema_valid": true,
322:         "validation_errors": []
323:  ...

Found 100 matches (more matches available)
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:
  Line 33:               "right_kind": "set_policy",

  Line 118:               "right_kind": "override",

  Line 152:               "right_kind": "steward",

  Line 357:           "ambiguity": "The issue proposes enabling GitHub Discussions and offers moderation, but does not evidence an implemented organizational rights change.",

  Line 491:           "ambiguity": "Closed, unmerged draft PR contains product implementation work but no organizational rights change or demonstrated release.",

  Line 514:           "ambiguity": "The merged patch documents the TSC's existing decision authority and membership but does not show that organizational rights changed.",

  Line 625:               "right_kind": "inform",

  Line 663:               "right_kind": "set_strategy",

  Line 677:               "right_kind": "approve",

  Line 691: ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
220:         "design_status": "performance_blinded_model_informed_development",
221:         "transition_dates_excluded": True,
222:         "outcome_data_used": False,
223:         "model_input_fields": MODEL_INPUT_FIELDS,
224:         "documents": output,
225:     }
226: 
227: 
228: def parse_response(text: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
229:     candidate = text.strip()
230:     if candidate.startswith("```"):
231:         lines = candidate.splitlines()
232:         if len(lines) < 3 or lines[-1].strip() != "```":
233:             raise ValueError("unterminated JSON code fence")
234:         candidate = "\n".join(lines[1:-1]).strip()
235:     value = json.loads(candidate)
236:     if not isinstance(value, dict):
237:         raise ValueError("response must be an object")
238:     return value
239: 
240: 
241: def validate_response(response: dict[str, Any], ...

/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_adjudication.py
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/tests/test_governance_coding.py
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_coding.py
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/scripts/copilot-code-governance.mjs
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1.inputs.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-retrieval-development-v2.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-retrieval-development-v1.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-enriched-audit-envelope-v1.md
/home/byk/Code/institu...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/scripts/copilot-code-governance.mjs</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: import { mkdir, readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises";
2: import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
3: import { dirname, resolve } from "node:path";
4: import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url";
5: import { createHash } from "node:crypto";
6: 
7: const MODELS = new Set(["gpt-5.6-luna", "gpt-5.6-terra"]);
8: const EFFORTS = new Set(["low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"]);
9: const DISABLED_TOOLS = ["builtin:*", "mcp:*", "custom:*"];
10: const INPUT_FIELDS = Object.freeze([
11:   "entity_id",
12:   "publisher",
13:   "published_on",
14:   "source_type",
15:   "sources",
16:   "evidence_bounds",
17: ]);
18: const DOCUMENT_KEYS = new Set(["record_id", "source_url", ...INPUT_FIELDS]);
19: const TIMEOUT_MS = 180_000;
20: 
21: const SYSTEM_PROMPT = `You are one independent coder of organizational governance records. ...

/usr/bin/bash: line 1: python: command not found

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 22, in <module>
KeyError: 'records'

opentofu-github-issue-340: PASS
opentofu-github-pr-1010: PASS
opentofu-github-pr-1107: PASS
opentofu-github-pr-1152: PASS
unique_ordered_records: True
record_count: 4

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
100:         "source_text_truncated": false
101:       },
102:       "published_on": "2023-09-07",
103:       "publisher": "opentofu/opentofu",
104:       "record_id": "opentofu-github-issue-340",
105:       "source_type": "github_issue",
106:       "source_url": "https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340",
107:       "sources": [
108:         {
109:           "filename": null,
110:           "kind": "github_body",
111:           "source_id": "body",
112:           "text": "Open up github discussions on this repo\n\n### Summary\r\n\r\nEnable github discussions for this repo.\r\n\r\n### Problem Statement\r\n\r\nThere are a lot of questions around the project/code/governance/... especially in the early moments of this project. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_START
Open up github discussions on this repo

### Summary

Enable github discussions for this repo.

### Problem Statement

There are a lot of questions around the project/code/governance/... especially in the early moments of this project. We could enable github discussions to have a sort of forum with minimal effort from the admin and great value to the community/maintainers. Issues should be code-related, github discussions are for organizational questions and later also support questions.

### User-facing description

Users can ask and answer questions in the forum that are not directly code-related.

### Technical Description

https://docs.github.com/en/discussions
Github discussions is a growing feature, used successfully in a lot of big projects. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_START
Add Technical Steering Committee Summary for 2023-12-11
TEXT_END
SOURCE_ID: pr_metadata
KIND: github_pr_metadata
FILENAME: null
TEXT_START
{"base_sha": "fff368d2ee8750de01e8f3f1118a8af8dd650797", "changed_files": 1, "draft": false, "head_sha": "61eb05ef4910237a6386431f98d008a7f8574234", "merge_commit_sha": "2d55e6fcde77959a5c3cdbbbdd041eca9715a512", "merged": true, "merged_at": "2023-12-14T10:19:23Z", "state": "closed"}
TEXT_END
SOURCE_ID: patch:0
KIND: github_pr_patch
FILENAME: TSC_SUMMARY.md
TEXT_START
@@ -1,4 +1,111 @@
-# Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary
+# Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary  
+
+## 2023-12-11
+Steering committee summary### Attendees:
+
+- Igor Savchenko ([@DiscyDel](https://github.com/DicsyDel))
+- Marcin Wyszynski ([@marcinwyszynski](https://github.com/marcinwyszynski))
+- Roger Simms ([@allofthesepeople](https://github.com/allofthesepeople))
+- Roni Frantchi ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_START
Allow static evaluation of locals and variables for module sources and backends

This is the initial implementation of a static evaluation context that can be used to evaluate expression that do not rely on any state data (vars/locals only). 

This pretty closely follows the plan detailed in RFC #1042 as I had already started experimenting with this code and knew roughly what I needed to change.  All of the examples detailed in the RFC should be functional with this PR.

Current state of this work: Technical Preview.  Most components should be functional, but may have unexpected bugs or limitations.

TODO:
* [x] Circular references
* [ ] Fix a *lot* of tests
* [ ] Write a *lot* of tests
* [ ] Dramatically improve diagnostics.  The required information is there, but not well formatted.
* [ ] Make sure all module calls are passing the correct parameter context.  This was ad-hoc to start. ...

SOURCE_ID: body
KIND: github_body
FILENAME: null
TEXT_START
Add details on who/what/why the TSC is and list of current members

This information has been referenced in a few places, but it is good to have a clear description in the repo to help explain the issue flow and governance.

Also fixed the spelling of Omry Hay's name.
TEXT_END
SOURCE_ID: pr_metadata
KIND: github_pr_metadata
FILENAME: null
TEXT_START
{"base_sha": "86e18c0ec3dcb392633a03cd7036b8c44417ad27", "changed_files": 1, "draft": false, "head_sha": "6350c001cb565eb34fa4dea6ab4db003c975e0d2", "merge_commit_sha": "3d4db7126f813413cfef5d371be37ffa58a51bb6", "merged": true, "merged_at": "2024-01-19T15:56:40Z", "state": "closed"}
TEXT_END
SOURCE_ID: patch:0
KIND: github_pr_patch
FILENAME: TSC_SUMMARY.md
TEXT_START
@@ -1,7 +1,17 @@
 # Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Summary  
 
+The Technical Steering Committee is a group comprised of people from companies and projects backing OpenTofu. ...

2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce  cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json
14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769  cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json
{"record_id":"opentofu-github-issue-340","source_url":"https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/340","luna_a":{"schema_valid":true,"validation_errors":[],"response":{"affected_scope":"opentofu/opentofu repository","ambiguity":null,"announced_on":"2023-09-07","body_patch_relation":"not_applicable","confidence":0.98,"effective_on":null,"event_kind":"product","power_changes":[],"record_class":"control_event","title":"Proposal to enable GitHub Discussions"}},"luna_b":{"schema_valid":true,"validation_errors":[],"response":{"affected_scope":"opentofu/opentofu ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
180: 
181: 
182: def graph_edge_diff(
183: 	baseline: dict[str, Any] | None,
184: 	final_coding: dict[str, Any] | None,
185: ) -> dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]]:
186: 	baseline_edges = baseline.get("power_changes", []) if baseline else []
187: 	final_edges = final_coding.get("power_changes", []) if final_coding else []
188: 	baseline_by_key = {_edge_key(edge): edge for edge in baseline_edges}
189: 	final_by_key = {_edge_key(edge): edge for edge in final_edges}
190: 	return {
191: 		"added": [final_by_key[key] for key in sorted(final_by_key.keys() - baseline_by_key)],
192: 		"removed": [baseline_by_key[key] for key in sorted(baseline_by_key.keys() - final_by_key)],
193: 	}
194: 
195: 
196: def _validate_reviewer(reviewer: Any, index: int) -> list[str]:
197: 	path = f"reviewers[{index}]"
198: 	if not isinstance(reviewer, dict):
199: 		return [f"{path} must ...

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
70: 			digest.update(block)
71: 	return digest.hexdigest()
72: 
73: 
74: def verify_input_manifest(
75: 	manifest: dict[str, Any],
76: 	*,
77: 	artifact: Path,
78: 	documents: Path,
79: 	coding_package: Path,
80: 	protocol: Path,
81: 	coding_schema: Path,
82: 	adjudication_schema: Path,
83: ) -> dict[str, Any]:
84: 	if set(manifest) != REQUIRED_INPUT_PINS:
85: 		raise ValueError("input manifest has missing or unexpected keys")
86: 	if not isinstance(manifest.get("workflow_run_id"), int) or manifest["workflow_run_id"] < 1:
87: 		raise ValueError("input manifest workflow_run_id is invalid")
88: 	if not isinstance(manifest.get("artifact_id"), int) or manifest["artifact_id"] < 1:
89: 		raise ValueError("input manifest artifact_id is invalid")
90: 	for field, value in FROZEN_INPUT_PINS.items():
91: 		if manifest.get(field) != value:
92: 			raise ...

Found 9 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json:
  Line 214:     "source_audit": {

  Line 233:         "record_id", "source_url", "decision", "accepted_from", "reviewer_ids",

  Line 234:         "source_audit",

  Line 235:         "rationale", "evidence_limitations", "unresolved_reason",

  Line 236:         "claim_evidence_refs", "final_coding", "graph_edge_revision"

  Line 247:         "reviewer_ids": {

  Line 253:         "source_audit": {"$ref": "#/$defs/source_audit"},

  Line 255:         "evidence_limitations": {"type": ["string", "null"], "minLength": 1},

  Line 257:         "claim_evidence_refs": {

<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2:   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3:   "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4:   "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5:   "type": "object",
6:   "additionalProperties": false,
7:   "required": [
8:     "schema_version",
9:     "adjudication_id",
10:     "design_status",
11:     "transition_dates_excluded",
12:     "outcome_data_used",
13:     "inputs",
14:     "reviewers",
15:     "records"
16:   ],
17:   "properties": {
18:     "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19:     "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20:     "design_status": {
21:       "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22:     },
23:     "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24:     "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25:     ...

opentofu-github-issue-340: PASS
opentofu-github-pr-1010: PASS
opentofu-github-pr-1107: PASS
opentofu-github-pr-1152: PASS
reviewer: PASS
ordered_unique_record_count: 4