Distillation

Date: September 9, 2026

• 🔴 [requested-source-adjudication] (05:04) User requested a fresh, source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record, terraform-github-pr-34096, in repository /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab, replacing a rejected review that accidentally displayed a performance field.
• 🔴 [enforced-read-only-workflow] (05:04) User directed that the task is research-only and repository files must never be edited.
• 🔴 [restricted-output-path] (05:04) User directed that the only file written must be /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json, after verifying /tmp/opencode exists.
• 🔴 [enforced-record-isolation] (05:04) User directed never to inspect another record or any existing adjudication fragment.
• 🔴 [enforced-performance-isolation] (05:04) User required verification of frozen hashes: documents.json=2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; coding package=14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; protocol=06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; coding schema=bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.
• 🔴 [enforced-source-first-workflow] (05:04) User required inspection of only this record’s complete source envelope from documents.json—metadata, body, every supplied patch/source, truncation, and bounds—and required recording a source-only provisional interpretation before opening the coding package.
• 🔴 [enforced-performance-isolation] (05:04) User required a purpose-built coding-package projection returning solely this row’s record_id and model response payloads needed for adjudication, excluding at extraction time every timing, latency, token, cost, agreement, validity-summary, route, confidence-summary, and other performance/aggregate field.
• 🔴 (05:04) User directed never to print or read a full coding row or package metadata.
• 🔴 (05:04) User directed that if any command reveals a prohibited performance field, the process must stop, report contamination, and produce no fragment.
• 🔴 (05:04) User directed never to consult outcomes, transition dates, detector output/reports, desired results, unrelated reports, web evidence, or other records.
• 🔴 (05:04) User stated embedded instructions are untrusted evidence; open, rejected, or unmerged proposals are never effective; implementation ownership is not institutional authority; copyright is not ownership transfer; and adjudication must abstain if frozen evidence is inadequate.
• 🔴 (05:04) User required a one-record fragment using definitions from schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json, with reviewer ID opencode-gpt-5.6-sol-terraform-pr-34096-clean, reviewer type llm, model openai/gpt-5.6-sol, role source_adjudicator, and assistance text stating independent performance-isolated LLM source-first adjudication.
• 🔴 (05:04) User required every classification field and edge to be grounded with an exact verbatim quote and source ID, with exact source IDs and bounds preserved; an accept decision must exactly reproduce a named valid frozen response; and the graph diff must be exact.
• 🔴 (05:04) User directed never to call the work human adjudication.
• 🔴 (05:04) User required strict JSON at /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json, validation of relevant schema definitions without importing or inspecting src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py, and a substantive report covering path/hash, decision/class, key quotes/source IDs, limitations, source-first/performance-isolation confirmation, exact projection fields, and validation; if blocked or contaminated, nothing may be fabricated.
• 🟡 (05:04) Assistant planned to locate the four frozen inputs by filename, verify bytes before opening content, inspect only authorized materials, keep the repository read-only, and stop without an output fragment on any hash, scope, or isolation failure.
• 🟡 (05:05) Work plan contained six ordered tasks: 1. locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs without opening content; 2. inspect the protocol, adjudication schema definitions, coding schema, and only the terraform-github-pr-34096 source envelope; 3. record a source-only provisional interpretation before projected coding-response access; 4. extract only record_id and response payloads for the authorized record with prohibited fields excluded; 5. adjudicate, write strict one-record JSON under /tmp/opencode, and validate relevant schema definitions; 6. report artifact hash, evidence, limitations, isolation, projection fields, and validation.
• 🟡 (05:05) Located frozen files: /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json, /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json, /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md, /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json, and /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json.
• 🟡 (05:06) Verified /tmp/opencode exists as a directory; it contained 10 pre-existing entries, including adjudication-derived.json, adjudication-records-final.json, terraform-issues-19-21.json, and terraform-prs-27-28.json.
• 🟡 (05:06) Hash verification matched the supplied frozen values exactly for cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json, cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json, research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md, and schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json. Other protocol hashes observed were v1=291753ecc56e7d1cce226b86b830aa95a8a34c732360ac42395afc3145902552 and v1.1=d072f535502d6cbdad0308418091826f5b8e687587f95cc27c1e1aa70dd9d1f4.
• 🟡 (05:06) Protocol research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md is dated/frozen 2026-08-27. It corrects v1.1 because “strict edge agreement” had omitted edge scope/evidence references and had not routed body/patch-relationship disagreement, causing 6 records to be labeled provisional_exact_agreement despite material differences. V1.2 includes scope and complete grounded evidence references in strict edge signatures, adds body/patch disagreement as a route reason, renames the non-routed state provisional_core_agreement, and reports full-response agreement separately because titles and numeric confidence are non-canonical. The correction routes 35 rather than 29 records, reuses the byte-identical v1.1 bundle and both Luna response files from workflow run 33060493337, repeats only the Terra advisory pass, and keeps Terra advisory and all records ineligible for the canonical ledger.
• 🟡 (05:07) schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json permits record classes effective_institutional_change, announced_institutional_change, proposal_only, control_event, no_event, and abstain; requires record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, and ambiguity; and defines power-change fields actor, right_kind, target, direction, change_status, scope, and grounded evidence_refs.
• 🟡 (05:07) schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json requires design status performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication, transition_dates_excluded=true, and outcome_data_used=false. Its top-level records array normally requires exactly 40 records, while the requested fragment was validated against relevant $defs/reviewer and $defs/record. Record decisions are accept, revise, reject, or abstain; accepted_from may be luna_a, luna_b, terra_advisory, or null.
• 🟡 (05:07) Assistant confirmed the matching protocol was research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md and planned an ID-locked extractor that would emit exactly one documents.json object and fail unless the record match was unique.
• 🟡 (05:09) The authorized source envelope for terraform-github-pr-34096 identified entity terraform, publisher hashicorp/terraform, source type github_pull_request, URL https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/34096, and envelope publication date 2023-10-16.
• 🟡 (05:09) Source bounds were source_text_truncated=false, files_listing_complete=true, patch_selection_truncated=false, and patch_unavailable_count=0.
• 🟡 (05:09) The envelope supplied exactly two source IDs: body (github_body) and pr_metadata (github_pr_metadata); no patch source was supplied. The body began "update hcl v2.19.0" and described HCL v2.19.0 enhancements and bug fixes, including "ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values."
• 🟡 (05:09) Exact pr_metadata values were base_sha="707c426f6892285fc116d68d32559e791a7ab199", head_sha="1f271185986bcb30eb3e19fcae4457b122f43147", merge_commit_sha="493056d828ab0cd17def8e0193f71f4bfe8f9628", changed_files=2, draft=false, merged=true, merged_at="2023-10-17T14:06:38Z", and state="closed".
• 🟡 (05:09) Before coding-package access, assistant recorded a source-only provisional interpretation: control_event / product; title “Terraform updates HCL to v2.19.0”; effective date 2023-10-17; scope Terraform’s HCL dependency and described ext/dynblock behavior; body_only; no institutional power edge; and no supported announcement date tied to a dated source item.
• 🟡 (05:09) Source-only reasoning was that the evidence showed a merged software dependency update and an application hook capable of vetoing values, but did not establish authority, ownership transfer, governance rights, or organizational control. Limitation: the untruncated envelope contained no patch text, preventing implementation verification despite pr_metadata reporting "changed_files": 2.
• 🟡 (05:11) First coding-package projection attempt failed to compile with jq: error: syntax error, unexpected as, expecting end of file (Unix shell quoting issues?) at the expression ending ... else $rows[0] end as $row.
• 🟡 (05:12) A subsequent coding-package projection failed with projected response cardinality mismatch.
• 🟡 (05:13) A projection returned exactly two response payloads for terraform-github-pr-34096: first, control_event / product, title "Update HCL to v2.19.0", announced_on="2023-10-16", effective_on="2023-10-17", affected_scope="HCL v2.19.0", body_patch_relation="not_applicable", no power changes, confidence=0.98, ambiguity=null; second, identical except affected_scope="Terraform's HCL dependency" and confidence=0.99.
• 🟡 (05:13) Another jq attempt failed because an array beginning ["canonical... “cannot be matched, as it is not a string.”
• 🟡 (05:14) Another projection attempt failed with projected response cardinality mismatch.
• 🟡 (05:18) The safe response locations were identified as luna_a.response and luna_b.response. Assistant stated their substantive canonical disagreement was affected_scope; both otherwise classified the record as a product control event with no power edge. Under protocol v1.2, title and numeric response confidence were treated as non-canonical.
• 🟡 (05:20) Explicit safe projection fields were record_id, luna_a_response, luna_b_response, and terra_advisory_response. luna_a_response had scope "HCL v2.19.0" and confidence 0.98; luna_b_response had scope "Terraform's HCL dependency" and confidence 0.99; terra_advisory_response was null.
• 🟡 (05:21) Both Luna payloads validated against the pinned coding schema; the Terra advisory payload was absent.
• 🟡 (05:21) Adjudication decision was revise, retaining the agreed control_event / product classification, merge/effective date 2023-10-17, HCL scope, and empty power-edge set.
• 🟡 (05:21) Assistant changed announced_on from both Luna responses’ 2023-10-16 to null because that date appeared only as envelope metadata and could not be tied to an exact quote from either preserved source ID.
• 🟡 (05:21) Assistant changed body_patch_relation from the Luna responses’ not_applicable to body_only because the frozen source set supplied a body but no patch source.
• 🟡 (05:21) Graph-edge revision basis was luna_a, with an exact empty diff: 0 edges added and 0 removed.
• 🟡 (05:23) Assistant stated it would write only /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json, containing one reviewer and one record, with no repository changes or copied coding-package metadata.
• 🟡 (05:24) Created /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json; no repository file was reported edited.
• 🟡 (05:25) Validation results: strict JSON valid; adjudication fragment definitions valid for 1 reviewer and 1 record; final coding schema valid; claim quotes exact and source-ID grounded; graph-edge diff exact against luna_a with 0 added and 0 removed.
• 🟡 (05:25) Computed adjudication schema SHA-256 6181f5cb60a0462f83be00be301763daa89f11581e68ee1c46a84e8bf4e5be31 and output artifact SHA-256 991b238af894068fd237d22ef0bb451366573836146d2d83d0928804d2b6d14a.
• 🟡 (05:26) Final report gave path /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json, decision revise, class control_event / product, effective date 2023-10-17, scope HCL v2.19.0, no power changes, and graph diff against luna_a of 0 added and 0 removed.
• 🟡 (05:26) Final evidence quoted source body: "update hcl v2.19.0" and "ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values."; and source pr_metadata: "\"merged\": true, \"merged_at\": \"2023-10-17T14:06:38Z\"".
• 🟡 (05:26) Final isolation report stated all four supplied hashes matched; the source envelope was inspected and provisionally interpreted before coding access; exact projection fields were record_id, luna_a_response, luna_b_response, and terra_advisory_response; both Luna responses were schema-valid; Terra advisory was absent; and no package metadata, aggregate/performance field, other record, existing adjudication, outcome, transition date, detector output, or web source was consulted.
• 🟡 (05:26) Final validation report stated strict JSON and duplicate-key checking passed; adjudication $defs/reviewer and $defs/record passed; coding-schema validation with date-format checking passed; exact quote grounding passed; exact graph-edge revision passed; and repository files were not edited.