Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Session 0MoQhTTXKwOd
0MoQhTTXKwOdbq1SrFresh source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record: terraform-github-pr-34096. Repository: /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab. This replaces a rejected review that accidentally displayed a performance field. Research only; never edit repository files. Write only /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json after verifying /tmp/opencode exists. Never inspect another record or any existing adjudication fragment.
Strict performance isolation:
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; coding package file 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; protocol 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; coding schema bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.documents.json: metadata, body, every supplied patch/source, truncation and bounds. Finish and record a source-only provisional interpretation BEFORE opening the coding package.record_id and model response payloads needed for adjudication. Explicitly exclude every timing, latency, token, cost, agreement, validity-summary, route, confidence-summary, or other performance/aggregate field at extraction time. Never print or read a full coding row or package metadata. If your command reveals any prohibited performance field, stop and report contamination; produce no fragment.I’ll locate the four frozen inputs by filename, verify their bytes before opening any content, then inspect only the protocol, schemas, and the single authorized source envelope. I will keep the repository read-only and stop without an output fragment if any hash, scope, or isolation check fails.
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs without opening their content",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Inspect protocol, adjudication schema definitions, coding schema, and only terraform-github-pr-34096 source envelope",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record a source-only provisional interpretation before accessing projected coding responses",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only record_id and response payloads for terraform-github-pr-34096 with prohibited fields excluded",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate, write strict one-record JSON under /tmp/opencode, and validate relevant schema definitions",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Report artifact hash, evidence, limitations, isolation, projection fields, and validation",
...
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/sol-reasoning-hard-case-protocol.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/llm-event-triage-cost-frontier-protocol.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json
<path>/tmp/opencode</path> <type>directory</type> <entries> adjudication-derived.json adjudication-records-final.json check-fragments-base-1558.ts check-fragments-base.ts check-fragments-head.ts check-fragments-patch.ts craft-configuration.md institutional-transition-adjudication-9642983578/ terraform-issues-19-21.json terraform-prs-27-28.json (10 entries) </entries>
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769 cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json 291753ecc56e7d1cce226b86b830aa95a8a34c732360ac42395afc3145902552 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md d072f535502d6cbdad0308418091826f5b8e687587f95cc27c1e1aa70dd9d1f4 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs without opening their content",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Inspect protocol, adjudication schema definitions, coding schema, and only terraform-github-pr-34096 source envelope",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record a source-only provisional interpretation before accessing projected coding responses",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only record_id and response payloads for terraform-github-pr-34096 with prohibited fields excluded",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate, write strict one-record JSON under /tmp/opencode, and validate relevant schema definitions",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Report artifact hash, evidence, limitations, isolation, projection fields, and validation",
...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path> <type>file</type> <content> 1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2 2: 3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27 4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol 5: 6: ## Correction 7: 8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders. 9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict 10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted 11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the 12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called 13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences. 14: 15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph 16: construction: 17: 18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2: "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3: "$id": "https://github.com/BYK/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json",
4: "title": "Performance-blinded governance coding v1",
5: "type": "object",
6: "additionalProperties": false,
7: "required": ["record_class", "event_kind", "title", "announced_on", "effective_on", "affected_scope", "body_patch_relation", "power_changes", "confidence", "ambiguity"],
8: "properties": {
9: "record_class": {"enum": ["effective_institutional_change", "announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only", "control_event", "no_event", "abstain"]},
10: "event_kind": {"type": ["string", "null"], "enum": ["leadership", "board_or_steering", "control_rights", "reorganization", "foundation_transfer", "license", "fork", "reunification", "strategy", "product", "external", ...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2: "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3: "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4: "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5: "type": "object",
6: "additionalProperties": false,
7: "required": [
8: "schema_version",
9: "adjudication_id",
10: "design_status",
11: "transition_dates_excluded",
12: "outcome_data_used",
13: "inputs",
14: "reviewers",
15: "records"
16: ],
17: "properties": {
18: "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19: "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20: "design_status": {
21: "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22: },
23: "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24: "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25: ...
All four supplied hashes match exactly; the matching protocol is research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md. I have also confirmed /tmp/opencode exists. I’ll now use an ID-locked extractor that emits exactly one object from documents.json; it will fail unless the record match is unique.
{
"entity_id": "terraform",
"evidence_bounds": {
"files_listing_complete": true,
"patch_selection_truncated": false,
"patch_unavailable_count": 0,
"source_text_truncated": false
},
"published_on": "2023-10-16",
"publisher": "hashicorp/terraform",
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34096",
"source_type": "github_pull_request",
"source_url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/34096",
"sources": [
{
"filename": null,
"kind": "github_body",
"source_id": "body",
"text": "update hcl v2.19.0\n\nHCL v2.19.0 \r\nEnhancements\r\n- ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values. The behavior is unchanged for callers that don't set the new option. (https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl/pull/634)\r\n\r\nBugs Fixed\r\n- hclsyntax: Further fixes for treatment of \"marked\" values in the conditional ...
Source-only provisional interpretation, recorded before any coding-package access: control_event / product, titled “Terraform updates HCL to v2.19.0,” effective on the merged date 2023-10-17, scoped to Terraform’s HCL dependency and the described ext/dynblock behavior, with body_only, no institutional power edge, and no announcement date supported by a dated source item. The source shows a merged software dependency update and an application hook that can veto values; it never establishes authority, ownership transfer, governance rights, or organizational control. The frozen envelope is untruncated and lists only body and pr_metadata; it supplies no patch text, which limits implementation verification despite metadata stating "changed_files": 2.
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs without opening their content",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Inspect protocol, adjudication schema definitions, coding schema, and only terraform-github-pr-34096 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record a source-only provisional interpretation before accessing projected coding responses",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only record_id and response payloads for terraform-github-pr-34096 with prohibited fields excluded",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate, write strict one-record JSON under /tmp/opencode, and validate relevant schema definitions",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Report artifact hash, evidence, limitations, isolation, projection fields, and validation",
...
jq: error: syntax error, unexpected as, expecting end of file (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 25:
| if ($rows | length) != 1 then error("expected exactly one matching coding row") else $rows[0] end as $row
jq: 1 compile error
jq: error (at cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:4085): projected response cardinality mismatch
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34096",
"response_payloads": [
{
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "HCL v2.19.0",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform's HCL dependency",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
}
]
}
jq: error (at cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:4085): array (["canonical...) cannot be matched, as it is not a string
jq: error (at cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json:4085): projected response cardinality mismatch
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab</path> <type>directory</type> <entries> .git/ .github/ .gitignore .lore.md .pytest_cache/ .ruff_cache/ .venv/ AGENTS.md cases/ data/ docs/ node_modules/ package-lock.json package.json PROTOCOL.md pyproject.toml README.md research/ schema/ scripts/ src/ tests/ uv.lock (23 entries) </entries>
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/scripts/copilot-code-governance.mjs
No files found
No files found
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34096",
"response_payloads_in_frozen_order": [
{
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "HCL v2.19.0",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform's HCL dependency",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
}
]
}
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34096",
"response_payloads_in_frozen_order": [
{
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "HCL v2.19.0",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
},
{
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform's HCL dependency",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
}
]
}
No files found
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34096",
"responses": [
{
"response_location": [
"luna_a",
"response"
],
"response_payload": {
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "HCL v2.19.0",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
}
},
{
"response_location": [
"luna_b",
"response"
],
"response_payload": {
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0",
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform's HCL dependency",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
...
The isolated projection found exactly two frozen coding payloads at the safe paths luna_a.response and luna_b.response; both classify the record as a product control event with no power edge. Their only substantive canonical disagreement is affected_scope; title and numeric response confidence are non-canonical under protocol v1.2. I’m checking the explicit terra_advisory.response slot directly, without exposing its container or any routing or aggregate fields, so an absent or malformed advisory cannot be mistaken for a missing extraction.
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34096",
"luna_a_response": {
"affected_scope": "HCL v2.19.0",
"ambiguity": null,
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"confidence": 0.98,
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"event_kind": "product",
"power_changes": [],
"record_class": "control_event",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0"
},
"luna_b_response": {
"affected_scope": "Terraform's HCL dependency",
"ambiguity": null,
"announced_on": "2023-10-16",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"confidence": 0.99,
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"event_kind": "product",
"power_changes": [],
"record_class": "control_event",
"title": "Update HCL to v2.19.0"
},
"terra_advisory_response": null
}
coding schema valid; projected valid responses: luna_a, luna_b; terra_advisory absent
Both frozen responses validate against the pinned coding schema, and no Terra advisory payload exists for this row. I will issue revise: retain the agreed control_event / product classification, merge date, HCL scope, and empty edge set; set announced_on to null because 2023-10-16 appears only as envelope metadata and cannot be tied to an exact quote from either preserved source ID; and use body_only because the frozen source set contains a body but no patch source. The exact graph diff against luna_a is empty in both directions.
No files found
I’m writing only /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json. The fragment will contain one reviewer and one record, with no repository changes and no copied package metadata.
Success. Updated the following files: A ../../../../tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json
strict JSON: valid adjudication fragment definitions: valid (1 reviewer, 1 record) final coding schema: valid claim quotes: exact and source-ID grounded graph edge diff: exact against luna_a (0 added, 0 removed) adjudication schema sha256: 6181f5cb60a0462f83be00be301763daa89f11581e68ee1c46a84e8bf4e5be31 artifact sha256: 991b238af894068fd237d22ef0bb451366573836146d2d83d0928804d2b6d14a
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs without opening their content",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Inspect protocol, adjudication schema definitions, coding schema, and only terraform-github-pr-34096 source envelope",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Record a source-only provisional interpretation before accessing projected coding responses",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only record_id and response payloads for terraform-github-pr-34096 with prohibited fields excluded",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Adjudicate, write strict one-record JSON under /tmp/opencode, and validate relevant schema definitions",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Report artifact hash, evidence, limitations, isolation, projection fields, and validation",
...
Result
/tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json991b238af894068fd237d22ef0bb451366573836146d2d83d0928804d2b6d14arevisecontrol_event / product2023-10-17HCL v2.19.0luna_a: 0 added, 0 removedEvidence
body: "update hcl v2.19.0"body: "ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values."pr_metadata: "\"merged\": true, \"merged_at\": \"2023-10-17T14:06:38Z\""The record describes a merged product dependency update, never an institutional authority or ownership change.
Isolation
record_id, luna_a_response, luna_b_response, terra_advisory_response.terra_advisory_response was absent.announced_on is null because the publication date lacks an exact quote tied to either preserved source ID.body_patch_relation is body_only; no patch source was supplied despite metadata reporting two changed files.Validation
$defs/reviewer and $defs/record: passed.Your one-record adjudication at /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json passed $defs validation, but the repository fragment validator requires two top-level fields you omitted. Correct only the envelope: preserve the existing reviewers and records values byte-semantically, add top-level schema_version: 1 and design_status: performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication, and keep exactly these four top-level properties: schema_version, design_status, reviewers, records. Do not reopen source files, coding package, other records, memory, outcomes, performance data, existing fragments, or src/institution_lab/governance_adjudication.py. Do not edit repository files. Rewrite only /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json. Validate strict JSON and a top-level schema with additionalProperties false and required four fields, using $defs already used for the existing reviewer/record validation. Return new SHA-256 and substantive validation result; never empty.
I’ll add only the two required envelope fields, then validate the four-property top level and prove the unchanged reviewers/records projection still hashes to the prior artifact SHA-256.
Success. Updated the following files: M ../../../../tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 24, in <module>
assert raw.startswith(b"{\\n" + inserted)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError
The first check failed because the verifier overescaped its expected byte prefix; it did not change the artifact. I’m rerunning the same validation with the literal prefix corrected.
strict JSON: valid; duplicate keys: none top-level properties: exact and ordered (schema_version, design_status, reviewers, records) top-level schema: valid; additional properties forbidden; all four fields required reviewer/record definitions: valid (1 reviewer, 1 record) existing reviewers/records bytes: unchanged; reconstructed prior sha256: 991b238af894068fd237d22ef0bb451366573836146d2d83d0928804d2b6d14a artifact sha256: 1a08b7528577890b4829fca53cb0d1717d0f7a46b8012ab13dcfecb6381f0734
Updated /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34096-clean.json.
1a08b7528577890b4829fca53cb0d1717d0f7a46b8012ab13dcfecb6381f0734additionalProperties: false: passed$defs: passedreviewers and records bytes remained unchanged, verified by reconstructing the prior SHA-256Date: September 9, 2026 * 🔴 [requested-source-adjudication] (05:04) User requested a fresh, source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record, `terraform-github-pr-34096`, in repository `/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab`, replacing a rejected review that accidentally displayed a performance field. * 🔴 [enforced-read-only-workflow] (05:04) User directed that the task is research-…