Dashboard › institutional-transition-lab › Session 0RhhfsU5yRuV
0RhhfsU5yRuVpkudyFresh source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record: terraform-github-pr-34103. Repository: /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab. This replaces a rejected review that accidentally displayed a performance field. Research only; never edit repository files. Write only /tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34103-clean.json after verifying /tmp/opencode exists. Never inspect another record or any existing adjudication fragment.
Strict performance isolation:
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce; coding package file 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769; protocol 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933; coding schema bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e.documents.json: metadata, body, every supplied patch/source, truncation and bounds. Finish and record a source-only provisional interpretation BEFORE opening the coding package.record_id and model response payloads needed for adjudication. Explicitly exclude every timing, latency, token, cost, agreement, validity-summary, route, confidence-summary, or other performance/aggregate field at extraction time. Never print or read a full coding row or package metadata. If your command reveals any prohibited performance field, stop and report contamination; produce no fragment.I will first verify the four immutable inputs and the permitted output directory, then inspect only the target source envelope. I will record the provisional source-only interpretation before projecting the two model payloads, and I will stop without output if any extraction exposes a prohibited field.
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs; verify /tmp/opencode exists",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope and record provisional source-only interpretation",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only target record_id and model response payloads from coding package",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Build exact one-record adjudication fragment and graph diff",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate relevant JSON Schema definitions and report artifact hash/evidence",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
}
]
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/sol-reasoning-hard-case-protocol.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/llm-event-triage-cost-frontier-protocol.md
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/documents.json 14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a754769 cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json 291753ecc56e7d1cce226b86b830aa95a8a34c732360ac42395afc3145902552 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.md d072f535502d6cbdad0308418091826f5b8e687587f95cc27c1e1aa70dd9d1f4 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.1.md 06d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933 research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8e schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json
drwxr-xr-x 3 byk byk 4096 Sep 9 04:59 /tmp/opencode
All four hashes match exactly, and /tmp/opencode exists. The governing protocol is research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md; I am now reading only that protocol and the two schemas needed to interpret and validate the target record.
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/research/oss-governance-coding-protocol-v1.2.md</path> <type>file</type> <content> 1: # Performance-blinded OSS governance coding protocol v1.2 2: 3: Date frozen: 2026-08-27 4: Status: pre-adjudication evaluator correction; model-informed development protocol 5: 6: ## Correction 7: 8: The V1.1 run used the intended frozen 40-record manifest and unchanged coders. 9: Its mandatory artifact audit found that the evaluator's field named “strict 10: edge agreement” compared actor, right, target, direction, and status but omitted 11: edge scope and evidence references. It also did not route disagreements in the 12: separately coded body/patch relationship. Six records were consequently called 13: `provisional_exact_agreement` despite material differences. 14: 15: V1.2 corrects the evaluator before any source adjudication or canonical graph 16: construction: 17: 18: - strict edge signatures now include scope and the complete grounded ...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2: "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3: "$id": "https://github.com/BYK/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-coding-v1.schema.json",
4: "title": "Performance-blinded governance coding v1",
5: "type": "object",
6: "additionalProperties": false,
7: "required": ["record_class", "event_kind", "title", "announced_on", "effective_on", "affected_scope", "body_patch_relation", "power_changes", "confidence", "ambiguity"],
8: "properties": {
9: "record_class": {"enum": ["effective_institutional_change", "announced_institutional_change", "proposal_only", "control_event", "no_event", "abstain"]},
10: "event_kind": {"type": ["string", "null"], "enum": ["leadership", "board_or_steering", "control_rights", "reorganization", "foundation_transfer", "license", "fork", "reunification", "strategy", "product", "external", ...
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>
1: {
2: "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
3: "$id": "https://institutional-transition-lab.local/schema/governance-adjudication-v1.schema.json",
4: "title": "Performance-blinded governance adjudication v1",
5: "type": "object",
6: "additionalProperties": false,
7: "required": [
8: "schema_version",
9: "adjudication_id",
10: "design_status",
11: "transition_dates_excluded",
12: "outcome_data_used",
13: "inputs",
14: "reviewers",
15: "records"
16: ],
17: "properties": {
18: "schema_version": {"const": 1},
19: "adjudication_id": {"type": "string", "minLength": 1},
20: "design_status": {
21: "const": "performance_blinded_llm_assisted_source_adjudication"
22: },
23: "transition_dates_excluded": {"const": true},
24: "outcome_data_used": {"const": false},
25: ...
{
"entity_id": "terraform",
"evidence_bounds": {
"files_listing_complete": true,
"patch_selection_truncated": false,
"patch_unavailable_count": 0,
"source_text_truncated": false
},
"published_on": "2023-10-17",
"publisher": "hashicorp/terraform",
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34103",
"source_type": "github_pull_request",
"source_url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/34103",
"sources": [
{
"filename": null,
"kind": "github_body",
"source_id": "body",
"text": "Backport of update hcl v2.19.0 into v1.6\n\n\n## Backport\n\nThis PR is auto-generated from #34096 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.6-backport.\n\n\n\nThe below text is copied from the body of the original PR.\n\n---\n\nHCL v2.19.0 \r\nEnhancements\r\n- ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each ...
Source-only provisional interpretation, recorded before opening the coding package: this is a merged Terraform v1.6 product backport, not an institutional authority change. Provisional coding is control_event / product, announced and effective on 2023-10-17, body_only, with no institutional power edge; the key boundary is that HCL’s optional application hook to “check and potentially veto” values describes software capability, while the frozen source never grants any actor an institutional right. The envelope contains only body and pr_metadata; it reports two changed files but supplies no patch, while its bounds say patch_selection_truncated=false and patch_unavailable_count=0, so patch contents remain an evidence limitation.
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs; verify /tmp/opencode exists",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope and record provisional source-only interpretation",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only target record_id and model response payloads from coding package",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Build exact one-record adjudication fragment and graph diff",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate relevant JSON Schema definitions and report artifact hash/evidence",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
}
]
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/cases/review/oss-governance-adjudication-v1/v1.2-coding-package.json
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab</path> <type>directory</type> <entries> .git/ .github/ .gitignore .lore.md .pytest_cache/ .ruff_cache/ .venv/ AGENTS.md cases/ data/ docs/ node_modules/ package-lock.json package.json PROTOCOL.md pyproject.toml README.md research/ schema/ scripts/ src/ tests/ uv.lock (23 entries) </entries>
No files found
<path>/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/scripts</path> <type>directory</type> <entries> build-reports.mjs copilot-code-governance.mjs copilot-extract-events.mjs (3 entries) </entries>
Found 7 matches
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/scripts/copilot-extract-events.mjs:
Line 237: const response = await session.sendAndWait(
Line 241: const content = response?.data?.content;
Line 255: response_text: content,
/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/scripts/copilot-code-governance.mjs:
Line 119: content: `${SYSTEM_PROMPT}\n\nFrozen response JSON Schema:\n${schemaText}`,
Line 129: const response = await session.sendAndWait({ prompt: prompt(document) }, TIMEOUT_MS);
Line 130: const content = response?.data?.content;
Line 143: response_text: content,
jq: error: syntax error, unexpected FIELD (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 9:
[$path[] | strings | capture("(?<name>luna_a|luna_b|terra_advisory)"; "i")?.name] | last;
jq: 1 compile error
{
"record_id": "terraform-github-pr-34103",
"model_responses": [
{
"response_name": "luna_a",
"payload": {
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": "2023-10-17",
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.99,
"ambiguity": null
}
},
{
"response_name": "luna_b",
"payload": {
"record_class": "control_event",
"event_kind": "product",
"title": "Backport HCL v2.19.0 into Terraform v1.6",
"announced_on": "2023-10-17",
"effective_on": null,
"affected_scope": "Terraform v1.6",
"body_patch_relation": "not_applicable",
"power_changes": [],
"confidence": 0.98,
"ambiguity": null
}
},
{
...
No files found
No files found
Found 1 matches /home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab/.lore.md: Line 51: * **Fragment filename ordering**: Trap: concatenating valid adjudication fragments in lexical filename order looks deterministic, but filenames encode reviewer subsets rather than authoritative corpus positions, so the aggregate can falsely fail frozen-order validation. Fix: retain each fragment unchanged, assemble records by the frozen corpus index, then verify exact IDs, count, uniqueness, reviewer uniqueness, and order before full-envelope validation.
The safe projection exposed only record_id plus model_responses[].response_name and the ten coding-schema payload fields: record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, and ambiguity. It exposed no package metadata or prohibited performance/aggregate field. terra_advisory exactly matches the source-first interpretation, including body_only and the missing-patch limitation, so I will accept it unchanged and record an empty added/removed graph diff against that basis.
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs; verify /tmp/opencode exists",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope and record provisional source-only interpretation",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only target record_id and model response payloads from coding package",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Build exact one-record adjudication fragment and graph diff",
"status": "in_progress",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate relevant JSON Schema definitions and report artifact hash/evidence",
"status": "pending",
"priority": "high"
}
]
The adjudication must stop: my fragment-format memory lookup returned a summary of an unrelated frozen Valkey record. It exposed no performance, outcome, transition-date, detector, or aggregate field and occurred after the source-only interpretation, but it still violates your absolute one-record isolation rule. I will not write the fragment.
(no output)
[
{
"content": "Locate and hash-verify the four frozen inputs; verify /tmp/opencode exists",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Extract only terraform-github-pr-34103 source envelope and record provisional source-only interpretation",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Project only target record_id and model response payloads from coding package",
"status": "completed",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Build exact one-record adjudication fragment and graph diff",
"status": "cancelled",
"priority": "high"
},
{
"content": "Validate relevant JSON Schema definitions and report artifact hash/evidence",
"status": "cancelled",
"priority": "high"
}
]
BLOCKED
An unrelated-record memory summary surfaced while resolving fragment format. This violated the strict one-record isolation rule. No performance or aggregate field was exposed, but I stopped immediately.
/tmp/opencode/terraform-pr-34103-clean.json does not exist.Completed Checks
All frozen hashes matched:
2a62ab05687982c112a29f6126227c26c3ff8defc89ca64662753aaf85c3c0ce14644759f53071adfe1173d4e25bb01931b8c1591fa8a48295dbd0556a75476906d4b3407677fe7fb23046f70164a366db06638e8a29af3daf7661f00d565933bfc735a7d8602d1f236a88c2d23b195f0600a8bae86fb8c8936afe7883a41b8eThe source-only provisional interpretation was recorded before opening the coding package: control_event / product, with no institutional power edge.
Key source evidence:
body: “Backport of update hcl v2.19.0 into v1.6”body: “dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values.”pr_metadata: "merged": truepr_metadata: "merged_at": "2023-10-17T14:19:12Z"pr_metadata: "changed_files": 2Bounds were preserved exactly: source text untruncated, file listing complete, patch selection untruncated, and zero unavailable patches. No implementing patch was supplied, limiting implementation-content verification.
The coding projection exposed only:
record_id, model_responses[].response_name, record_class, event_kind, title, announced_on, effective_on, affected_scope, body_patch_relation, power_changes, confidence, and ambiguity.
No package metadata or prohibited performance/aggregate field was exposed.
Date: Sep 9, 2026 * 🔴 [enforced-workflow] (05:05) User directed a fresh, source-first adjudication of exactly one frozen record, `terraform-github-pr-34103`, in repository `/home/byk/Code/institutional-transition-lab`, replacing a rejected review that accidentally displayed a performance field. * 🔴 [forbade-editing] (05:05) User stated research only and directed never to edit repository files. …